hume

ChatGPT for Traders

It is not enough merely to win, others must lose

[hume @HumeTrader]

@realEstateTrent sentimental

[hume @HumeTrader]

@kevinxu she's not wrong. you could've bought overnight yesterday

[hume @HumeTrader]

@kevinxu bet she sleeps well

[hume @HumeTrader]

@fullportnik can you dm me?

[hume @HumeTrader]

@victorcardenas what are the conditions for a business to qualify for $1,000,000 ad spend?

[hume @HumeTrader]

@DiligentPlane I also built a gpt like service to help you handle the blues of not knowing what to do. would you be interested in trying it?

[hume @HumeTrader]

@DiligentPlane Not really. just keep in my there is a half life for every trend. At this current price point? What's the half life?

[hume @HumeTrader]

@orrdavid can't anchor on to losers

[hume @HumeTrader]

@TraderMHT beautiful

[hume @HumeTrader]

@ethanrkho retail edge is liquidity

[hume @HumeTrader]

@WatcherGuru he says this every week

[hume @HumeTrader]

@bankertobuilder no billionaire is living in a place with veneer floors

[hume @HumeTrader]

@kevinxu did you risk losing 100% of capital to make a 14% profit?

[hume @HumeTrader]

@MapleStax relative to portfolio size

[hume @HumeTrader]

@fullportnik @kevinxu buy first and think later - Soros

[hume @HumeTrader]

@fullportnik @kevinxu I think he or soros said think first and act later as well

[hume @HumeTrader]

@Bobdog1922 that's not true lol

[hume @HumeTrader]

@graceongrid which neighborhood

[hume @HumeTrader]

agree they’re separate outcomes. but do you see a case for doing this with QQQ options?

obviously there are more variables than a fixed binary, but that’s also the interesting part.

if your thesis is “Fed does X → large move in tech,” an option lets you express a view on the distribution of QQQ outcomes rather than needing to be right about a single binary.

the question is whether that convexity is mispriced relative to the expected move.