dodo345

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@BarrySilbert thanks for the answer!

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@JesusMartinez can you give me one subnet that really justifies that TAO will go to a crazy bull run right now?

maybeee beam?...

I think a lot of people in bittensor are confusing quantity with quality.

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@CryptoZPunisher its really is amazing how bittensor is such bullish ecosystem now.
And the subnets are still trash.

I dont like lium,chutes,engy or targon now because they all have uglyy websites.
i know They'll be serius when the sites will compare to akash and io-net.

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@markjeffrey You can’t become the global network for GPUs if you’re site look like trash.

Think big. Brands win.

Look at the site and tell does it really give you the impression of a 1B+ valuation.

This applies to chutes and targon to.

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@SiamKidd @CryptoZPunisher Agree, subnet does not equal a company. Some are for optimisation mostly.

Powerd by the incentive layer ,TAO.

So TAO is the asset that Powers the machine(subnets)

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@DreadBong0 @Grayscale I think when people lunch a subnet they need to think of it as

The global network for….

A lot don’t do this and that’s too bad because the incentive layer is very strong.

Of course the moat should be AI.

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@rBryer23 @lium_io You can’t become the global network for GPUs if you’re site look like trash.

Think big. Brands win.

Look at the site and tell does it really give you the impression of a 1B+ valuation.

This applies to chutes and targon to.

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@AltcoinMillie @chutes_ai @engyai everybody act like if one fails the other succeed.
currently they both suck.

you need to measure the qaulity against the whole market.

not just bittensor.

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@Donaxbt You can’t become the global network for GPUs if you’re site look like trash.

Think big. Brands win.

Look at the site and tell does it really give you the impression of a 1B+ valuation.

This applies to chutes and targon to.

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@jon_durbin It’s not a competition betweeen the subnets .

It’s a competition with the outside .

That’s the comparison that you need to do.

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@rBryer23 Chutes and targon has weak brands and ugly sites.
They will not succeed like that .

Compare it to akash and io net and the their brands and sites are way stronger.

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@SiamKidd @engyai I hope they succeed.
Engy site is still very simple.

The brands and site design are very important.
Brand attracts users and revenue .

If I compare chutes and targon sites and logos to akash and io net. It is not the same level at all.

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@SiamKidd @engyai mog subnets are pretty good example for good design (hippius, blockmachine)

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@markjeffrey I think chutes and targon suck .
Bittensor needs at least one good inference/ compute subnet .
The brands and site design are terrible.

Io net and akash are example for good brands .

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@DFVTAO Chutes and targon suck , the brands and the sites design are terrible .
Bittensor need one good inference subnet at least.

Chutes needs to go!!

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@YVR_Trader @TheNDubbs Latent gives off a low quality vibe so far.

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@tseutseutao You sure it’s quality ??
Did they prove anything yet?
Website looks trash

[dodo345 @HyytYdw]

@Beinish_dos לוותר על כל מה שאני
מה , וחילוניים לא ״מוותרים״ על שנתיים שמונה מהחיים שלהם .