It doesn’t matter how hot she is.
It doesn’t matter how great the sex is.
It doesn’t matter how well she takes care of you.
It doesn’t matter if you’re the only man in her life.
If she has weak morals, she isn’t worth having.
Sedikit menambahkan. Usahakan hemat air, buang buang air pada kondisi sekarang justru mengancam krisis air.
Pertama, air yang menguap tidak serta merta menjadi hujan, kondensasi sulit terbentuk saat suhu meningkat dan jumlah asap yang melimpah di atmosfir (konsentrasi air rendah).
Kedua air yang dibuang mungkin kurang dari 20% yang menguap, dikarenakan debit air permukaan (sungai danau dll) yang menyusut serta pori tanah yang terbuka mempercepat infiltrasi.
Yang perlu kita dorong adalah usaha rekayasa hujan buatan harus segera dilakukan.
Serius tanya:
Ada konten guru honorer unboxing gaji setelah dua bulan kerja.
Misal nanti 2027, posisinya udah diisi PPPK/PNS.
Pertanyaannya, nasib dia bagaimana?
Jawaban atas itu akan menjawab, mengapa honorer dipelihara dan diproduksi.
We think the collapse in birth rates is a modern problem. It is not. The most powerful man in the world once faced the exact same thing, and he was so alarmed he passed laws to force his people to have children.
This was not a modern government: it was Rome 2000 years ago...
The emperor was Augustus, and by his reign the Roman elite had grown wealthy, comfortable, and reluctant to marry or raise families. Men preferred bachelorhood and affairs to the burden of a wife and children.
Augustus found it alarming enough to legislate. Around 18 BC and again in AD 9, he pushed through the Lex Julia and the Lex Papia Poppaea, a sweeping set of laws designed to engineer a baby boom by decree.
The measures were direct: unmarried men and childless couples faced penalties on what they could inherit. Those who married and had children were rewarded with faster careers and public honors. Women who bore three or more children were granted a special legal freedom, the ius trium liberorum, the "right of three children," releasing them from male guardianship.
The state was, quite literally, paying its citizens to reproduce and fining them when they did not.
It didn't work...
The laws were resented, evaded, and endlessly tinkered with, and Rome's elite went on having small families anyway. The historian Cassius Dio records Augustus standing before the childless men of Rome and shaming them to their faces: "You are committing murder in not begetting in the first place those who ought to be your descendants." A city, he warned them, is not its buildings but its people: "For it is human beings that constitute a city, not houses or porticos or market-places empty of men."
Now look at the numbers today. For a population simply to hold steady, women need to average about 2.1 children each. South Korea recently hit 0.72, the lowest rate ever recorded for any country on earth, and even after a small rebound to 0.8 in 2025, it remains less than half of what a country needs to sustain itself. Italy and Japan sit near 1.2, China around 1.0, Spain near 1.1. The United States is about 1.6, the United Kingdom 1.5. According to the UN, more than half the world's countries are now below that line.
History doesn't repeat itself, the saying goes, but it often rhymes, and this pattern is old and eerily familiar. A society climbs to the height of its wealth and comfort, and at that very peak its people stop having children, and no law, no incentive, no sum of money seems able to talk them back into it.
Rome tried, with the full power of an empire behind it, and failed. At its height the city held more than a million people, a size no European city would reach again for 1700 years, until London in the 1800s.
The Roman historian Livy, writing as the Republic gave way to the empire, said his was an age that "can endure neither its vices nor their cure." Two thousand years later, staring at the same problem and just as unable to solve it, we may be watching the beginning of the same story...
A civilization does not always fall to an enemy at the gates. As the historian Arnold J. Toynbee once said: “Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder.”
Never accept pressure without authority. If people expect you to carry the consequence but deny you the right to shape the decision, they are not honoring your responsibility, they are renting your obedience. Responsibility without control is just exploitation.
Bueno resulta que en China cuando estaba la ley de que solo podías tener un hijo por familia muchas familias decidieron tener solo hijos varones
Entonces hay más hombres que mujeres y muchas familias tienen que pagar muchísimo dinero a las familias y las novias para que se casen con sus hijos
Dato curioso del día
Una relación puede sobrevivir a:
-Una gran discusión,
-Un mal momento,
-Una etapa de distancia,
-Una decisión equivocada.
Una relación difícilmente sobrevivirá a:
Un neurólogo dice:
"Saca la lengua durante 40 segundos—esto elimina el cortisol más rápido que cualquier pastilla o ejercicio de respiración.
La gran industria farmacéutica está entrando en pánico: 🧵
CHIEF OF STAFF.
Kalau kamu pikir politik cuma seputar pidato resmi dan debat publik di TV, kamu salah besar.
Kenyataannya, arah sebuah negara sering kali ditentukan di lorong-lorong remang oleh orang-orang tanpa wajah yang tak pernah masuk kamera.
Drakor Chief of Staff adalah drama politik soal cara kerja kekuasaan yang sebenarnya. 🧵👇
1. Sebelum Squid Game, Lee Jung-jae sudah lebih dulu memukau lewat peran Jang Tae-jun—seorang kepala staf jenius yang mengendalikan papan catur politik Yeouido dari balik layar.
Pertanyaan moral terbesar drama ini:
"Apakah kamu harus ikut menjadi busuk demi mendapat kekuasaan untuk memperbaiki sistem yang busuk?"
2. Anatomi kekuasaan yang dibedah di sini terasa sangat nyata:
Bukan Soal Baik vs Jahat: Tidak ada pahlawan murni. Semua karakter berlayar di area abu-abu.
Transaksi di Balik Layar: Bagaimana isu publik direkayasa, media dimanipulasi, dan hukum dijadikan alat transaksi.
Idealisme vs Realita: Idealisme tanpa strategi cuma jadi umpan empuk bagi politisi veteran.
3. Dinamika Jang Tae-jun dan Kang Seon-yeong (Shin Min-a) juga memberi perspektif segar. Mereka sepasang kekasih dari kubu politik berbeda—saling mencintai, tapi tetap harus saling berhitung ancaman politik masing-masing.
Tidak ada drama picisan, yang ada hanya kompromi tingkat tinggi.
4. Chief of Staff bukan cuma tontonan hiburan, tapi cermin dingin dunia politik modern: Idealisme adalah kemewahan, dan kompromi adalah syarat bertahan hidup.
Untuk yang suka thriller politik berkecepatan tinggi tanpa pemanis buatan, drama ini wajib masuk daftar tontonan.
Oalah seperti ini informasi yang sampai ke presiden selama ini.
• Akun Seskab Klaim Kalimantan sudah BEBAS ASAP
• Sebagian masyarakat Kalimantan masih dikepung asap dan kebakaran lahan makin meluas, akun Seskab justru memposting daerah di Kalimantan sudah bebas asap.
• Postingan akun Seskab ini juga di reply langsung Teddy.
I finally understand what Machiavelli meant when he said, "Never play fair in a game where others cheat." It doesn't mean become evil. It means stop being naive. Stop bringing honesty to people who study manipulation, stop giving access to people who weaponize closeness, and stop expecting clean hands from people who already showed you they'll throw dirt. Sometimes wisdom is not revenge. Sometimes wisdom is learning the rules of the room before the room uses your goodness against you.
Ini baru Visioner @prabowo
Andai ini benar
Patut di acungin jempol
Program Prioritas Prabowo ini
Melihat jauh kedepannnnnn.
Ngga perlu belok Kanan kiri
Langsung TERJUN Ke JURANG
Ampunnn
Bener2 SALAH URUS
Nih PROGRAM PRAB .
🤣
Dialog yang sehat bukan soal siapa yang paling banyak bicara, tetapi siapa yang juga mau mendengar. Jika ruang dialog dipenuhi saling memotong, substansi justru hilang. Perbedaan pendapat seharusnya dijawab dengan argumen, bukan emosi. Santai aja bang Qodari Fathimah bukan musuh untuk diajak berdialog. 🤭