Historical NFTs (2015-2017) are a safe bet. They don't need a team or updates.
Every historical project is undervalued compared to punks and ether rocks. Punks was widely believed to be the "first NFT" even by the time they hit the Christy's auctions, which was not true. Their narrative changed a few times. I don't say this to devalue them, I think they're worth more actually.
There are projects older and more scarce than punks. Some projects as scarce as etherrocks, but not discovered by most of CT or your favorite influencer yet.
risk takers will find a number of logical reasons to position in #bitcoin around these values
why?
because breaking down from here on a htf closing basis opens the door to ALL KINDS of mega bearish scenarios
remember that i like to keep things SIMPLE!!!
@jediwolf Throughout art history, the tradart market never had native timestamps. This led to vague, approximate, and often incorrect dating of artworks. Today, a new medium introduces verifiable timestamps for the first time. fundamentally changing how art can be dated, authenticated.
all gotta believe in something and I do believe in the power of the pamp. It’s kind of like, you know, “Let the Pamp be with you”
I went to bed yesterday, I told you guys on Twitter, I told you guys on Twitter: “Good night, and let the pamp be with you, okay?”
This is how I see,