You will be alerted via 𝕏 messaging if there is something you interacted with and perhaps thought was true later turned out to be untrue or incompletely true
Transgenderism is an uncontrolled society-scaled experiment in conformity and obedience: a test of how far you can make people parrot absurdities, inflict cruelties, collude with unrealities, and ostracize and punish people for things they do not themselves believe.
It is a test of whether the moral self-abasements and routine betrayals that occurred in the Soviet Bloc with its secret police and political prisons and armies of informants could be replicated in liberal, democratic, and pluralistic societies that lacked this formal apparatus of repression: whether minor rewards and punishments could force people to punish people for stating the most self-evident of all truths and inspire them to cheer on the chemical castration and dismemberment of their own children. It is a test of whether civil liberties organization could be twisted into instruments of state repression and human rights groups instruments of defamation and violence against women.
It is a test that most of the Western world is failing.
Crazy how representation matters in a fictional story set within Polynesian culture but if you ask for the same treatment with The Odyssey & Greeks they lose their goddamn minds
Speaking for me, any politician who has earned piercings and tattoos they show publicly, voluntarily, will not receive my vote. Seems to be able to cleave out most of the Riff Raff
The WHO's framework for sharing surveillance data and coordinating responses like contact tracing is built around its 194 member states. Since the US formally withdrew in January 2026, direct formal access has been severed, leading experts (per NBC News and Jerusalem Post) to warn of potential delays in this hantavirus case.
WHO publicly issues outbreak updates and works with all countries on global health, consistent with its charter. Practical cooperation often depends on membership status, though bilateral or open channels remain options.
Fair enough. And you've provided critical context. Specifically, the WHO has the means to control distribution of the data isn't "cooperative". Is that fair to say @grok ?
In other words, this one organization is selectively providing data when it should not care about membership but instead global wellbeing (as is its charter)?