“Women talk more than men”
In a recent study it was found that when women talked 15% of the time (and men 85% of the time), men perceived it as equal participation. And when women talked 30% of the time, men perceived it as women dominating the discussion.
This is you from the future- “OH MY GOD! Just saw Masters of the Universe on Prime Video! That was amazing! Why’d no one tell me? wish I could’ve seen it in theaters. My god would this even get a sequel??”
We can change this future. Watch #mastersoftheuniverse in theaters now
had a conversation about this the other night and this guy said "I actually think Kratos is a big wife guy and would be happy to see his wife's story being shared w the world" and I just think that's beautiful
So let me get this straight, Israel’s counterintelligence risk was just elevated to critical, while simultaneously our dumba** congressmen refused to take out section 224. THAT SHOULD MEAN THEY ARE COMPROMISED. But it’s okay, Pulte is head of ODNI now. FML.
A 17-year-old valedictorian, Leen Hijaz, used her graduation speech to speak for the voiceless: "Millions suffering in Palestine, Sudan, Congo, Afghanistan. Families torn apart by ICE."
The school administrator cut her mic. Told her: "If you don't stop, you're not graduating." They withheld her diploma for four days.
Apocalyptic bird nest.
A Russian glide bomb knocks down a tree in Donbas. From the shattered branches rolls out a tiny bird’s nest.
Made of drone fiber-optic cable.
Source: Oleg Malchenko
it would be a lot less scary having a disabled kid in America if you knew that there were high quality and affordable long-term residential care options for them when they were adults.
Amazingly light headline because it's Israel.
"The correct headline is "Israeli forces murder a Palestinian baby on lands they illegally occupy. Nobody will ever be brought to justice."
Ok… so I just read an article from Stanford about AI and hiring and it sounds like a conspiracy theory until you realize it’s actually how landing a job works now.
Essentially the say that over 90% of companies use automated systems to screen resumes before an employee ever sees it. The study looked at 4 million applications from about 3 million people and found that most companies are using algorithms from the same exact third party companies. So… basically if the algorithm doesn’t like you at the first company you applied to there’s a solid chance the exact same bias/score is rejecting you at any other company using this tool too regardless if you’re more qualified for that role than the first role. The paper says it’s like planting an entire country’s crops from the exact same seed. If there’s a flaw it spreads everywhere. The same thing happens in hiring now. People assume they’re getting a bunch of independent chances when they apply to different jobs but they are just getting evaluated by the same system over and over again.
One of the craziest things was that 4% of applicants who applied to 10 different jobs were recommended for rejection by the algorithm every single time….