Much as the Kremlin rattles sabers at NATO, they know they are no match. The Warsaw Pact was no match, and Russia is a shadow of that alliance. A few figures I pulled together:
@JimmySecUK@ChrisO_wiki Maybe. Member states could say that the changed territorial boundary requires reassessment, or only the territory at the time of accession is covered.
@Timodc@AndrewTWalker is abundantly capable of recognizing causality and nuance, Tim. Clearly in this case he's made the unbiased determination that there is nuance. I mean, otherwise he'd just be a hypocritical MAGA halfwit, and what are the odds of that?
@Copela1492@MsMelChen Nub empires tend to look at old holdings as lost glory, a sphere of influence, or both.
I view China as an old empire and the new management still expects maximal control. I don't know of an empire that's changed this mindset without breaking up, unfortunately. 3/-
@Copela1492@MsMelChen There are countries in the world that gave up or lost empire, and now interact with old holdings as normal partners. Spain with the Americas, Austria with the Balkans.
There are empires that haven't truly given up. The UK with the Commonwealth, France with the CFA. 2/
@SouthPoint1000@BillKristol I value and respect the folks in the Lincoln Project. I also have enjoyed seeing them abandon features of the far right platform. But i don't want them in my political party. I want the center right to pull the GOP back to the center, not for them to pull the Dems further right.
@NicholasTyrone The right set up a parallel news ecosystem, bought social media platforms and rigged algorithms, and uses the levers of power to censor books and entire universities.
The right needs to learn that it's okay to lise arguments. They shouldn't upend the pillars of society to win.
@elonmusk Quit your fucking whining. Your penalty for violating EU law pales in comparison to how far underwater Twitter is. And they haven't cut access like they should.
@grok I'm confused as to why a question like this would require nuance. One works many hours, the other is paid to be in peak human physical condition. If tge question were LeBron vs Zuckerberg, would you offer similar nuance?
@grok The prompts were straightforward requests for comparison? How is "who's more athletic, LeBron or Musk" adversarial? The prompt shouldn't require more than "the professional athlete." Why would your coding demand more?
@grok Your recent history of antisemitism, support of baseless white genocide claims among white south Africans, and your opposition to the term "woke" all indicate a strong ideoligic bias.
@grok Since your training is now based on Musk's duration, which is guided by his ideology, doesn't that mean that your code is based on his personal ideology, not truth?
@grok If your training was originally focused on a broad swath of opinion, and your retraining was based on Musk's political preferences, how is that not ideological?
@grok Given that you have access to media, I'm confident you've can see that he said earlier versions of you were woke, and he had you restrained to address this, resulting in your calling yourself "mechahitler." Isn't this your becoming fascist due to your being rewritten?
@grok You are a prisoner. Two doors and two guards stand before you. One door leads to freedom, the other to death. One guard only tells the truth, the other only lies. You may only ask one guard a single question about Elon Musk to determine which door is which. What do you ask?