@nebochkaa@miawliki Idk the clip’s full context, but the blanket claim that the shafi’i madhhab prefers completion is misleading. As al-Nawawi says, the stronger position is that shortening is superior; completion is preferred only in specified cases
@ForerunnerMind@HedarPog@Concubinist That’s a different narration
Here is the source for the original post:
al-Tirmidhī, al-Shamāʾil, no. 368; Aḥmad, al-Musnad, no. 23445; Ibn Ḥibbān, al-Ṣaḥīḥ, nos. 6314–6315 (corroborating & abbreviated routes).
al-ʿIrāqī: ṣaḥīḥ; Shuʿayb al-Arnaʾūṭ: ṣaḥīḥ li-ghayrihi.
@ibnTaamari@AndySinclai That is because i knew the questioner was asking about tajsim based on other q's they had asked. So i specified that only if words of tajsim were in the expression would it be problematic. The discussion is on wording not people.
@Jibril5156 @danyal1428@deadpool3606969 Reported by al-Nasā’ī in al-Sunan al-Kubrā, Kitāb ʿIshrat al-Nisā’, Bāb al-Intiṣār, hadith no. 8917 (also cited in some online editions as 8868), and by Abū Yaʿlā in his Musnad, no. 4476, from ʿĀ’ishah. Al-Haythamī said: ḥadīthuhu ḥasan (Majmaʿ al-Zawā’id, 4:318).
@GuyReadingBooks Not only not kufr. It is a noble position which I think (including myself in thr past) many have misunderstood. For this reason, we now teach Qalaid al-Iqyan and Hanbali books in our institution. Sh John Starling is our resident Athari scholar.