Wrote this back in September about communal online film watching and such. Amazon introduced Watch Parties about a month later. https://t.co/xEvEtomq8q
big literary adaptations bring out the book critics and academics with fine ‘readings’ but little capacity to talk about film itself - 4k words but little to no mention of staging, framing, cutting or movement; acting reduced to casting, performances get an adjective or two
‼️ CfP ‼️
Beauty is central to cinema’s aesthetic appeal, yet it remains curiously under-discussed in much film scholarship. This conference invites a renewed focus on beauty as an aesthetic and affective phenomenon. Submit your abstracts by September 1st & be part of it!
we used to have michael haneke and lars von trier. now people think emerald fennell is some intellectual and a “provocateur.” the standards are so low.
Starting tonight at @ICALondon: ‘Serge Daney and the Promise of Cinema’, a film program I co-curated with
@_rtab_. It ties in with an Issue we edited for @sabzian_be, inviting writers worldwide to reflect on Daney’s thought and writing.
→ https://t.co/f9tPR0Ddtv
@FCardamenis it's astonishing how appropriate his dumb perpetually confused facial expression suddenly seems when he is being adversarial to someone like Ted Cruz
AI is a Matryoshka doll of nested idiocies: 1 automating away work is bad (it’s good) 2 automation eliminates work (it just recomposes it) 3 AI is good at what it does (it isn’t & it won’t scale) 4 AI is artificial intelligence (it’s software) 5 intelligence exists (it doesn’t)