Is it really happening? A top-10 exchange like MEXC responding to an $82K loss from a platform crash with just $300 "goodwill"? Refusing to share logs or address unfair liquidation pricing? How can this be their way? Traders deserve transparency! #JusticeForBohdan#MEXC
🚨 #JusticeForBohdan Intensifies! 🚨 MEXC’s response to my $82k loss? A paltry $300 “goodwill” for an email error, denying manipulation of my STRK_USDT liquidation at $0.0708 (vs. CoinGecko’s $0.0828 low). Claim: “fair price” triggered it. False! 📉
Their reply:
"Hi Dear, I am truly sorry... forced liquidation occurred because the fair price... $300 USDT bonus for the email error... please contact me for better service."
Truth: Their platform crashed Oct 10-11 flash crash—because it wouldn’t load, I couldn’t add margin to my 8-month trade, a tactic I always used to safeguard myself, leading to my liquidation. Binance personally refunded me for this trade with a liquidation price above $0.09. They’re obligated to provide logs (ToS 12.3, 7.3) but haven’t, hiding evidence! Plus, their new protection against liquidations [https://t.co/EqsHlpmsVn] clearly appeared after my viral post—damage control! Violations stack up:
ToS 8.2 (reliability guarantee) - platform down
ToS 13(f) (deleted screenshots), 12.3 (no API logs), 7.3 (no order book despite “transparency”)
ToS 9.1 (inactive $559M Insurance Fund), 17(c) (spoofing), 7.4 (failed Fair Price), 8.1 (24/7 service), 14.2 (no resolution in 8+ weeks)
GDPR Art. 5 (data leak, fines up to €20M or 4% turnover), Risk Guideline 3.2 (no notice), ToS 10.1 (unverified Reserves), 11.2 (no comp), 7.2 (opaque pricing)
Missing alerts (Policy 5.1), ToS 6.1 (unfair execution), 15.1 (no support), 16.1 (no crash protection), 5.3 (no real-time data)
ToS 18.1 (no audit trail), 19.2 (no incident reporting), 4.2 (no risk mitigation), 20.1 (no data integrity), 3.1 (no fair access)
ToS 2.1 (no user consent for data use), 21.1 (no privacy policy enforcement), 22.1 (no dispute escalation), 23.1 (no fee transparency), 24.1 (no service continuity)
ToS 25.1 (no fraud detection), 26.1 (no account security updates), 27.1 (no market data accuracy), 28.1 (no compliance reporting), 29.1 (no user fund segregation)
July-Aug 2025 report brags $559M Insurance Fund & $4.97M fraud intercepted (see image), yet ignored my loss. HTX even refunded users who lost on MEXC, exposing your failure!
Binance ($0.09 STRK refund), HTX, OKX, KuCoin, Bybit, Kraken, Gate io, Bitunix, dYdX, Coinbase refunded $19B+. Dozens join #JusticeForBohdan, reporting frozen funds & failed margin adds.
Imagine hundreds more stories piling on? We’ll file a collective lawsuit with regulators & media if needed. All evidence at
Perhaps now, given the severity of the GDPR violations, we should demand 20 million euros from them to seek justice for the data breach and platform failure that cost me my safeguarded 8-month trade? This demand reflects the potential fines they could face under GDPR (up to €20M or 4% of annual turnover) and the significant harm caused to me and potentially other users.
[https://t.co/VwtveAGGg2]. 40k views & growing!
#MEXC_Official #MEXCExchange #MEXCCommunity #MEXCSecurity #MEXCSupport #CryptoJustice #RefundNow #HTX_Global
@OGAudit @MEXC_Official MEXC just declared "CASE CLOSED" after I demanded Raw Server Logs for the 00:23 crash.
They refuse to explain the blank Fee Data. They refuse to check the 4-min engine delay.
Hiding evidence = Admission of Guilt. 📉
#MEXC#MEXC_SCAM#Crypto#JusticeForBohdan
@OGAudit @MEXC_Official After 3 months of asking MEXC about falsifications, deleted evidence, GDPR breach, fake wick — their final "help"? "Send impossible video or we can't assist." Pure evasion! Screenshots of my questions & their template attached. Answer the violations! #JusticeForBohdan#mexcscam
@OGAudit @MEXC_Official @OGAudit @MEXC_Official @DerrickYeo61993 @cecilia_hsueh@Pirez810316
Can we consider this an official position and response from Mexc?
It's not the first time their next bot has tried to justify them.
https://t.co/ycC6ou94Jj
🚨 MEXC's support in action: I directly asked them about Bogdan's detailed post exposing falsifications.
Their response? Complete radio silence on EVERY violation and proof.
They read everything—falsified CSV hiding $70k+ liquidations, empty deposits despite transfers, no buys at fake 0.0708 wick, deleted logs, GDPR breaches, denied ToS §13(f) data, ignored Insurance Fund, and more—then spam template BS: "not a system problem," "trading carries risk," "assets protected," links to PoR/Transparency Hub.
No single word addressing the evidence. No explanation for data tampering. No public response.
This is how MEXC "handles" facts: see them, read them, then publicly deny and ignore.
@MEXC_Official @cecilia_hsueh@usithetalk @DerrickYeo61993 — you can't template your way out of fraud allegations backed by screenshots, logs, and comparisons. Bogdan and victims deserve real answers, not PR deflection.
Over $8M lost, dozens of cases, systemic violations—and silence.
Community, keep sharing evidence. Regulators (@FSASeychelles @CySEC_Official), media (@Cointelegraph@CoinDesk@CryptoSlate), police (@INTERPOL_HQ)—this can't be ignored forever.
#JusticeForBohdan #MEXCScam #CryptoJustice #RefundNow
@DerrickYeo61993 @cecilia_hsueh
Derrick still reads my Telegram messages but ignores them, even after acknowledging evidence (falsified CSVs, deleted orders, GDPR breach #20251112000345). He’s seen every post (129k+ views) and just stays silent. I’m attaching a video of his read receipts — proof he’s avoiding accountability. This isn’t just a glitch; it’s deliberate evasion. Time for MEXC to answer publicly!
🚨Should users absorb the cost of exchange failures, or should exchanges take responsibility?
@MEXC_Official reportedly offered a mere $300 compensation after a user lost ~$70,000 due to a platform failure and a "scam wick" that happened on Oct 10th
Let’s examine An Ukrainian Soldier Bohdan @st88887's case that night and why this matters to every trader. 🧵
Mexc is immoral thief. After i exposed their filthy behavior for seizing my Funds. They blocked me and also explained that my account involved high risky behavior. Without any law enforcement They acted as jurisdiction and arbitrator to forfeit your money. What a clown world
@li_yuo46219 You're right — serious claims need review. But after 2+ months in "official channels," MEXC's Derrick Yeo acknowledged all evidence (falsified exports, deleted history, GDPR breach) in writing... and still refused compensation, demanding impossible "video from crash."
10 other exchanges compensated without "investigations." Evidence is public (links in my bio/posts). Waiting = stalling. Time for accountability, not excuses. #MEXC #STRK #CryptoJustice
🚨 MEXC SCAM EXPOSED - PROOF ATTACHED
I’ve been trading on MEXC premarket for the last 10–11 months without issues.
But as more new users joined recently, @MEXC_Official has started doing shady stuff.
In the last 20 days, 2 serious cases happened - must read
→ CASE 1: Collateral Scam (RateX Premarket)
As per MEXC’s own T&Cs:
If a seller fails to settle on time, the seller’s collateral go to the buyer.
What actually happened ❌
• Seller sold at $0.4
• Buyer bought at $0.4
• Listing price = $1.3 (3x)
• Seller obviously didn’t settle
- Collateral should’ve gone to buyers
- But MEXC didn’t give ANY collateral to buyers
- They kept it themselves
This is clearly mentioned in their T&Cs (SS attached) yet MEXC violated their own rules.
When contacted, customer support gave random, incorrect replies, clearly showing they don’t even understand how their own premarket works.
⚠️ Question: What right does @MEXC_Listings have to keep users’ collateral?
= This is nothing but a pure scam.
→ CASE 2: Settlement Failure + Funds Missing
About 10 days ago, I sold a token on premarket.
• Trade got terminated
• USDT never returned
• No clear explanation from support
Till now, no proper response.
🚩 Other Red Flags:
• @MEXC_Official customer support looks extremely unprofessional
• Support staff has no idea what’s happening internally
• Many community members faced the same issue (messages received)
If this continues, who will trust MEXC ?
Today it’s $10K–$15K.
If no action is taken, they’ll do much bigger scams tomorrow.
Be Careful !!
You called my story nonsense compared to "real problems" and completely ignored the multiple violations by MEXC. Yes, many were liquidated — but my issue isn’t just the liquidation. I’ve laid it all out for you: deleted screenshots (§26), altered CSVs, GDPR breach (#20251112000345), refusal of logs/order book (§13(f)), unused Guardian Fund (§13(h)), and more.
You dismissed it, saying it’s an industry-wide issue, yet Binance refunded my same STRK position in 4 days. MEXC’s response? Two months of "send video" demands and a $300 coupon for a $70k loss.
I’m not asking for sympathy — I’m asking for accountability. Your silence on their specific breaches is deafening.
And the most critical reason for my liquidation is that I couldn’t add margin — the app was frozen. This has already been confirmed by other users under my post, reporting the exact same issue during the crash.
🚨 @TheWhiteWhaleV2 — From Fighting MEXC Hero to Defender of Their Abuses? Well Done. Fair Play. How's Your Token Doing? 🚨
December 17, 2025. Let's rewind: You were the ultimate warrior against MEXC. They froze your $3.1M, accused you of bots, demanded a public confession of guilt. You raised hell, the community backed you, even @ZachXBT got involved. MEXC caved: public apology from @cecilia_hsueh, full unlock, you airdropped everything to the community and became a legend of crypto justice.
And now? You call my story (and similar ones) "nonsense" compared to "real MEXC problems." You completely ignore the specific violations I've laid out:
Deleted screenshots & pending orders (§26 data integrity breach)
Altered CSV exports (prices changed, commissions hidden)
GDPR violation (sent another user's ticket #20251112000345 — you even apologized for the "unrelated email," then denied it)
Refusal to provide logs/order book (§13(f))
Unused Guardian Fund (§13(h))
Your own blog admitting "lags or froze" (§3(g))
App freeze confirmed by thousands (I couldn't add margin — deposit address wouldn't even load)
Zero-volume wick liquidation 30-40% below CoinGecko low
Binance, HTX, Bybit, OKX, and others compensated identical STRK positions without demanding "video." MEXC's response? 2+ months of templates, a mocking $300 coupon for a $70k+ loss, and "send video."
You got your money back — and suddenly "it's an industry-wide issue, MEXC isn't at fault"? Your silence on these concrete breaches is deafening.
Community, this is classic: Get yours, forget the rest. While White Whale restructures LP bands on his memecoin and enjoys 80k followers, real victims like me (and many others) are left hanging.
Tag @TheWhiteWhaleV2 — let him explain why my evidence (straight from MEXC's own systems) doesn't deserve attention, but his did.
How's $WhiteWhale holding up? Volatility hasn't nuked the holders yet? 😏
All evidence preserved: Derrick chats, screenshots, tickets, exports. We're not stopping.
#MEXC #STRK #JusticeForBohdan #CryptoJustice #WhiteWhale
MEXC's GDPR Contradictions: Apology (Dec 8) → Denial (Dec 9) — Their Own Words Expose the Lies
Friends, here's the chronology of MEXC's absurd and contradictory responses on my GDPR violation (leak of another user's private ticket #20251112000345). All screenshots from my GDPR folder: https://t.co/0lY6af1qNv
I carefully analyzed each screenshot, date, and text:
Apology for "Unrelated Email" (Dec 8, 2025):
They admit the leak: "We sincerely apologize for the email you received that was unrelated to you. We fully understand the inconvenience this has caused and have immediately reported the situation to our internal team for review and handling to prevent similar incidents from happening again."
This is a direct acknowledgment of sending another user's data — GDPR §36 violation (unauthorized disclosure).
Screenshot: MEXC_GDPR_Apology_Unrelated_Email_2025-12-08.jpg
Denial of Leak (Dec 9, 2025):
Just one day later, they flip: "Regarding the ticket issue you mentioned, no user information was leaked."
They categorically deny the violation they apologized for the day before. This is gaslighting — "no evidence of GDPR violation" despite their own admission.
Screenshot: MEXC_GDPR_Denial_After_Apology_2025-12-09.jpg
This sequence shows deliberate contradiction: apologize for the leak on Dec 8, deny it on Dec 9. No compensation, no fine — just "sorry" then "no leak".
Their full text in denial: "MEXC categorically denies any allegations of data tampering... Our internal reviews... have found no evidence to support these claims."
But their apology proves the leak happened. This is not confusion — this is a cover-up.
Full GDPR folder with all screenshots and dates: https://t.co/0lY6af1qNv
@MEXC_Official @cecilia_hsueh @DerrickYeo61993 — explain your
flip-flop: apology for leak or "no leak"? Publicly!
#JusticeForBohdan #MEXC #MEXCExchange
@MEXC_Official @cecilia_hsueh Still no reply from your "User First" team🤣. I have formally lodged a full complaint against MEXC Global Ltd with the Financial Services Authority of Seychelles. My public thread has already reached over 400,000 views and is growing by the hour.🍿
MEXC Falsifies Data: Breakdown by UID 80879591
Friends, here's proof that MEXC falsifies data in exports to hide real losses and deny anomalies.
UID 80879591 — my main account, the only one where I managed to screenshot the order history immediately after the crash (before they deleted it). On the other 3 family accounts, the history was completely wiped — now only export to table, which cannot be trusted.
Screenshot immediately after liquidation:
Realized PnL: -25,353.5522 USDT
Closing Price: 0.0809
Liquidation Price: 0.0738
Closing Time: 2025.10.11 00: 19: 32
MEXC export table (after "review"):
Realized PnL: -24,822.03 USDT (understated by ~$531!)
Closing Price: 0.0726 (understated)
Liquidation Price: 0.0726
Closing Time: shifted (e.g., 23:19:38 — difference of 6 seconds)
Trading Commission: 0 or column missing (even though commissions were >$1,200 across all 4 accounts for sure)
Inconsistencies (falsification §26):
Loss amount understated by $531 — where is that money?
Closing and liquidation prices differ (0.0809 on screenshot vs 0.0726 in table).
Closing time shifted by 6 seconds — to "fit" their version of events.
Commission hidden — as if it never existed.
Orders deleted — table has no full history, only "adjusted" rows.
If there are so many inconsistencies even here — they tell me the app worked. But I couldn't log in and add margin. And I wasn't alone — thousands of users confirmed the freeze. This was the main reason for my liquidation. And this is just one account. How many more violations did they commit?
This is not a mistake — this is deliberate falsification to show smaller losses and deny anomalies. MEXC tables cannot be trusted — they delete orders, change prices, times, and amounts.
Full folder with comparison for UID 80879591: https://t.co/VnM5EvlZt2
@MEXC_Official @cecilia_hsueh @DerrickYeo61993 — explain the $531 understatement, 6-second time shift, hidden commissions, different prices, and deletion of orders? Publicly!
#JusticeForBohdan #MEXC #MEXCExchange
This is just one account — and so many inconsistencies. Share if you have the same! 💪
MEXC's real Derrick in action: ignores all evidence, spam-loops "provide video of past event," deletes proof links. Official support = endless denial machine protecting fraud. Victims deserve justice! #mexscam
⚠️ MEXC’s Mockery Level: Expert — Derrick Yeo Is Back With the Same Script today
They know I told them to stop.
They know I already sent all the evidence.
And Derrick still writes the exact same nonsense, a word for word.
I wrote:
“I already told you DO NOT WRITE ABOUT THAT VIDEO AGAIN. You ignore my evidence and repeat the same nonsense.
Derrick replied:
“Hi, I understand you” are extremely frustrated... If you still disagree with the findings, the specialist team asked that you reply to the email with any additional screenshots or video evidence...”
I admitted:
“I already told you I received the email. I am already attached to all violations. DO NOT WRITE ABOUT THAT VIDEO AGAIN. And you still do it.”
Derrick's final answer:
“Thanks for keeping us updated! To help us look into this properly, we'd really appreciate it if you could share a screen recording showing the issue at the exact time it happened...”
They literally asked for a video twice in 24 hours after I obviously told them to stop.
@cryptokijun got the exact same treatment - same denial, same demand for video, same deletion of evidence.
They offered him a $100, me a $300.
This is their standard strategy:
ignore all proof
delete the evidence
deny every violation
drive the user crazy with the same template
throw a $100-$300 coupon and hope he disappears
All so they don't have to return the money they stole.
@cryptokijun also confirmed: the exchange completely froze during the crash - he could not do anything either, lost money, and they cleaned his order history exactly like mine.
And to this day, support is still broken - red dot, messages don't send for weeks.
Right after my thread went viral, they suddenly launched the “Liquidation Coverage” fund (https://t.co/EqsHlpmsVn) - up to $2k/day protection for new users.
They completely abandoned everyone who was liquidated before - screw us, the main thing is to attract new blood with “protection” that never existed for us.
I traded on MEXC for over 2 years, trusted them with everything.
Just because I chose the wrong exchange, they didn't just rob me - they destroyed my entire life.
Not a single one of my posts has ever received a public reply from MEXC.
Only their bots comment (and I expose them every time).
All “communication” is hidden in email or TG - because they have nothing to say in the public.
Answer us publicly!
The whole world is waiting for your explanation of every violation.
@MEXC_Official @cecilia_hsueh @DerrickYeo61993— to explain this strategy.
#JusticeForBohdan #MEXC #MEXCExchange
Every single violation they committed (their own rules):
§13 (f) User Agreement - refusal to provide real-time transaction records and server logs (obligatory upon request)
Futures FAQ - refusal to show liquidation orders and Level 2 order book (promised for dispute verification)
§4.3 - unfair execution and lack of protection from anomalous fluctuations (30-40 % deviation from mark price)
§17 (c) - prohibition of spoofing/layering (zero-volume wick)
GDPR §36 - unauthorized disclosure of another user’s private ticket
§26 - implied warranty of data integrity (deleted screenshots, altered CSV export, erased order history)
§3 (g) - failure to mitigate known technical faults (app freeze, their own blog admits “lags or froze”)
§13 (h) - error correction procedure ignored
$100M Guardian Fund - announced for disputed losses, never used
PoR transparency is no verifiable execution data, no order-book snapshots
§ 28 disclaimer abuse hiding behind no guarantee while violating direct obligations
§21 (b) - multi-account rules ignored (4 UIDs liquidated simultaneously without cross-check)
Risk Guide - no fair price breakdown provided for disputes (mandatory)
They are legally obligated to give me the full order-book and logs for that moment - and they refuse.
Because it would show who bought my tokens at those fake prices when no one could log in.
This is not “market volatility”.
This is fraud.
No more private lies.
Everything public.
⚠️ MEXC's Latest Email: Peak Absurdity — They "Reviewed" My Evidence... Then Denied It All
Just got their "final" response. They admitted they opened and studied my full evidence folder (19 files of their own emails, screenshots, deleted orders, GDPR breach, altered CSVs, app freeze proofs).
Then they say:
- "No anomalies found" (despite seeing zero-volume wick at 0.0708 vs CoinGecko 0.0828)
- "No data leakage" (after sending me another user's private ticket)
- "Cannot open external links for security" (after "carefully reviewing the folder")
- "Provide screen recording of the abnormal behavior" (absurd — I was saving my position, not filming a tutorial)
- $300 bonus "goodwill" for $123k damage
How can they look at their own documents and write "no violations"?
Violations they ignore (their own rules):
- §13(f) — real-time transaction access (refused logs)
- §4.3 — fair execution/protection from anomalies (30-40% deviation)
- Risk Guide — minimize unnecessary liqs (zero-fill wick triggered it)
- GDPR §36 — data protection (breached with wrong ticket)
- Guardian Fund — for disputed losses (never used)
- PoR transparency — verifiable execution data (hidden Level 2/oracle)
10 other exchanges refunded (Binance returned my same STRK at 0.09 in 4 days). HTX even covered MEXC users.
Their "Futures Bonus 3" (https://t.co/EqsHlpmsVn) is damage control for new users — up to $2k/day — while old victims get $300 coupons.
And support? Still broken 2 weeks — red dot spins, messages don't send.
No $300. No more private emails.
Everything public forever.
Full latest denial + my response: https://t.co/VwtveAGGg2
Share your stories https://t.co/okPQs1m80S — we're 5 public + 20+ prepping. Tag @MEXC_Official @cecilia_hsueh@Derrickmexc — explain this hypocrisy.
#JusticeForBohdan #MEXC #MEXCExchange #CryptoTrading
This SBTC/USDT chart is a perfect snapshot of MEXC's "guarantees" in action—look at that massive red wick with zero volume and no fills, yet the platform claims "fair price" and "liquidity" like it's normal. During the Oct 10-11 crash, they liquidated my $70k STRK short at 30-40% below CoinGecko low (0.0708 vs 0.0828), app frozen so I couldn't add margin, then denied anomalies while hiding logs. Their Futures Rules promise "fair price to reduce unnecessary liqs from manipulation" (§17(c) bans spoofing), but wicks like this are exactly that—zero-trade traps.
What "openness" do they talk about? User Agreement §13(f) requires real-time transaction records and Level 2 access for disputes, Risk Guide demands oracle breakdowns, but they refuse everything, citing "internal security" (§28 loophole abuse). PoR audits should verify execution data, but they withhold it, breaching transparency. And their $100M Guardian Fund for "disputed losses"? Never used—§13(h) error correction ignored.