@kdj98x@Writingwrongs18@elssharris@OpenUniversity More website hits to get more people signing up to modules is my only plausible explanation.... Which isn't great for us.
I'm two pints in thought...
@12Xpert Also, let's say you have a bit of cash. Do affordability checks mean you're then targeted by the industry to spend it with them?
More bonuses/favourable odds to those who can afford it? Possibly increasing addiction - but that's okay if you can afford it?
@12Xpert https://t.co/rjF7YKhSrk
I'd wager a decent amount bookies could identify the majority of possible problem gamblers without resorting to unprecedented (frankly weird) levels of personal data.
@AwfullyMolly Well done Sara. It has been a cracking read and I'm sure you've achieved what you set out to.
All the best for your future. Enjoy yourself.
Good to see this sort of thing from @itvracing.
Using 11/10 odds when the true probability is evens would mean,
About a 61% chance of making any sort of profit in 100 bets and 92% chance of making a profit over 1000 bets.
All about the sample size.
@Seanmac06486473 Unlucky.
It's always good to see somebody coming up with their own stuff.
Do you go for the top rank or value vs SP - Izzy May for example?
I'm friends with a very, very minor celebrity whose accountant is essentially blackmailing them, regarding the loancharge.
There is a huge comparison between what is happening with Football Index and the loancharge right now.
I would call for more education too @12Xpert