🧵
Claiming back Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) would have profound strategic, political, economic, and symbolic consequences for India. Here’s a breakdown of the potential advantages and gains, assuming a scenario where it’s done successfully and sustainably.
⚔️VGP Giveaway Time!⚔️
Glitch is giving away a Zelda: Ocarina of Time [Foil Cover] Nintendo Switch 2 game, a Pro Controller, a Carrying Case AND one of her very own stickers to one lucky winner!
RT, Like & Follow VGP for your chance to win!
Want more chances to win? Check out our other social media accounts for additional entries!
Winner announced Friday, Dec 11, 2026
Another former Australian cricket Stuart MacGill has now come forward to explain how he tampered the ball during his playing days.
Did Australia ever win a single match without cheating? I doubt.
ICC should overturn all their test victories in last decade
In this 2003 interview, Maneka Gandhi revealed that after Sanjay Gandhi’s sudden death in June 1980, Indira Gandhi was completely shattered. Sanjay was not merely her son; he was also her political adviser and, in many ways, her “hero.”
Following this tragedy, Indira Gandhi began feeling extremely insecure and became increasingly obsessed with preserving her political dynasty. She felt the absence of a successor who could carry forward her legacy.
After Sanjay’s death, Indira Gandhi was compelled to turn back to Rajiv Gandhi, despite the fact that the two had reportedly not spoken to each other for the preceding three years. To bring Rajiv into politics and facilitate his return to the family’s political fold, Indira Gandhi allegedly had to give in to the demands and conditions imposed by Rajiv and his wife, Sonia Gandhi.
According to Maneka Gandhi, one of their principal demands was that “Maneka Gandhi must be shown the door, at any cost.” It was essentially a straightforward bargain: if Maneka did not leave, Rajiv and Sonia would walk out of the family. Indira Gandhi could not afford such a loss at that critical juncture and therefore felt compelled to accept their demands.
Maneka Gandhi further described the strange treatment she was subjected to within the household. Restrictions were imposed on her movements, and she was reportedly not even allowed to sit and dine at the same table with other family members when guests visited. Instead, she was made to sit at a separate table. Maneka eventually realised that Indira Gandhi herself was just as helpless and powerless as she was, with both of them becoming victims of decisions made by a “third person” — Sonia Gandhi.
In what Maneka Gandhi described as the biggest revelation of the interview, she asserted that the dispute was never really about who liked or disliked her. Based on her understanding of her sister-in-law Sonia Gandhi’s nature, Maneka claimed that the entire controversy was fundamentally about property and inheritance.
According to her, Sonia Gandhi wanted to ensure that Maneka remained excluded from the family and its property, received nothing, and relinquished all her legal rights in writing. Maneka claimed that she complied with everything demanded of her, only to be told eventually, in unmistakable terms: “Now, just leave this house."
सोनिया गांधी की किताब का सबसे इंटरेस्टिंग प्वाइंट गंगाधर नेहरू की तस्वीर है जिसे उन्होंने दिल्ली का कोतवाल बताया। कुछ बाते अब स्पष्ट होने लगीं जो कभी संभावना मानी जाती थीं। बाबर की कब्र से नेहरू के नाम तक वो कड़ी जो कभी जोड़ी नहीं गई, वह कड़ी शायद मिल गई।
इतिहास में कुछ नाम ऐसे होते हैं जो आते हैं और फिर ऐसे गायब होते हैं जैसे कभी थे ही नहीं। सैयद मुबारक शाह खान ऐसा ही एक नाम है।
जून 1857 — दिल्ली जल रही है। नेशनल आर्काइव्स के दो उर्दू हुक्मनामों पर आखिरी दस्तखत है , "कोतवाल-ए-देहली, सैयद मुबारक शाह खान"। ये है दिल्ली के आखिरी मुगल कोतवाल का सरकारी सबूत।
और उसके बाद? सन्नाटा। न अंग्रेजों की फांसी की लिस्ट में नाम, न काले पानी की लिस्ट में, न कब्र का पता, न परिवार का। एक पूरी हस्ती फाइल से बाहर।
ठीक उसी सन्नाटे में दूसरी हस्ती एंट्री मारती है, गंगाधर नेहरू।
सरकारी कागज में 1857 से पहले गंगाधर नाम का कोई कोतवाल नहीं। ब्रिटिश रिकॉर्ड में, मुगल फरमान में, बहादुर शाह जफर के दरबार की हाजिरी में कहीं नहीं। पर परिवार की किताब में लिखा गया गंगाधर आखिरी कोतवाल थे और फैक्ट है कि दिल्ली का आखिरी कोतवाल 1857 में दिल्ली छोड़कर आगरा भाग गया था। वही कहानी जो मुबारक शाह की भी है। दो कोतवाल, एक ही कहानी, एक ही साल, एक ही पलायन।
यहाँ से तीसरा नाम आता है , लोहारू।
1857 से ठीक पहले दिल्ली का कोतवाल कौन था? मुईन-उद-दीन हुसैन खान। इतिहास की फुटनोट में लिखा है वो लोहारू खानदान से था। लोहारू क्या है? वो रियासत जो 1803 में बनी, पर जिसका खून सेंट्रल एशिया से है। वही फरगना, वही ताशकंद, जहाँ से बाबर आया था। लोहारू नवाब खुद को बाबर की ही नस्ल का, उसी तुर्क-मुगल रक्त का बताते हैं।
तो चेन देखो, लोहारू खानदान (बाबर की नस्ल) मुईन-उद-दीन हुसैन खान (दिल्ली का कोतवाल) सैयद मुबारक शाह खान (आखिरी कोतवाल) गायब।
गायब होने के बाद नाम बदलना पड़ा। 1857 में मुगल नाम मौत का वारंट था। आगरा में एक नया नाम चाहिए था जो अंग्रेजों की नजर में सेफ हो, हिंदू हो, पंडित हो। नहर के किनारे घर था, तो नाम रख दिया नेहरू। लोहारू से नेहरू सिर्फ दो अक्षर का फेर।
और अगर ये सिर्फ नाम बदलने की कहानी होती तो यहीं खत्म हो जाती। पर कहानी खत्म नहीं होती, वो काबुल तक जाती है।
19 सितंबर 1959 जवाहरलाल नेहरू काबुल में हैं और प्रोटोकॉल तोड़कर बाग-ए-बाबर जाते हैं।
1968 इंदिरा गांधी उसी कब्र पर सिर झुकाती हैं। नटवर सिंह लिखते हैं "सदियां मिल रही थीं।"
1976 उसी कब्र पर इंदिरा के साथ राजीव और राहुल खड़े हैं।
28 अगस्त 2005 राहुल गांधी मनमोहन सिंह के साथ फिर उसी कब्र पर।
चार पीढ़ी। एक ही कब्र। दुनिया में किसी और भारतीय प्रधानमंत्री का बाबर की कब्र पर जाने का ऐसा रिवाज नहीं। पृथ्वीराज चौहान की कब्र गजनी में कुछ ही दूर है, वहाँ कोई नहीं जाता।
क्यों? क्योंकि बाकी लोगों के लिए बाबर एक हमलावर है, पर इस खानदान के लिए वो शायद पूर्वज है।
इसीलिए सरकारी फाइल में मुबारक शाह का आगे का पता नहीं चलता और गंगाधर का पीछे का पता नहीं चलता। फिर संभावना यह भी बनती है कि दोनों एक ही आदमी के दो नाम हैं , एक नाम जो बाबर के खून से लोहारू होता हुआ दिल्ली की कोतवाली तक आया, और दूसरा नाम जो आगरा में नहर के किनारे नेहरू बन गया।
(लेखक तथ्यों का सत्यापन नहीं कर रहा, यह वह उपकल्पना है जिसकी परीक्षा बाकी है।)
चित्र @Profdilipmandal की वॉल से साभार।
Sonia Gandhi mentioned in her book that grand father of Jawaharlal Nehru was last kotwal of Mughals
As per national archives, there was no hindu kotwal in Mughal history. There is no mention of Gangadhar Nehru in any mughal records
As per national archives, last two kotwal of Mughals were:
Sayyed Mubarak Shah Khan
Muin ud-Din Husain Loharu
So here is the possible story
After failed revolt of 1857, Britishers started killing Mughal officers.
To save himself and his family from British, Muin ud-Din Husain Loharu fled from Delhi and changed his name to Gangadhar Nehru and in public they became Hindu but in private they maintained their Mughal lineage. Muin ud-Din Husain Loharu was from Tashkent lineage
Is this the reason Nehru chose Red fort for his 15th August 1947 speech ?
Is this the reason all members of Nehru Gandhi family go to Babar's tomb?
I leave it to public to find out
This is the picture of Gangadhar Nehru (aka Muin ud-Din Husain Loharu?)👇
In which angle he looks Hindu?
Interesting. Hindu festivals are designed around the very things that psychologists have identified as essential for our happiness. https://t.co/aXeTJNFyKu
Please watch what the psychiatrist below is saying first. Or just read the caption by Sahana.
Now, we need to understand this is the main reason for the DS and its Red-Green cabal to attack India's festivals while trying to brainwash India's young from celebrating them.
Why?
The DS literally run studies in many labs to understand human psychology and how to weaponize it. They really know the power of Indian festivals.
They know our festivals are designed to promote psychological well-being. They create a belonging with Indian culture, civilization, society, and boost our economy.
All these are undesirable for the India destabilizing forces. It impedes their cause. Hence they attack Diwali, Holi, Navaratri, Sankranti, you name it. They demonize Indian festivals to Indians.
They invest a lot to program young Indians to feel celebrating Indian festivals is superstitious, not cool, polluting, patriarchal, etc.
Unfortunately, many young and idealistic fall for this psyop as these DS forces appeal to the environmentalist, animal lover, feminist, or altruist in them.
India's festivals are its biggest strength. Central and state govts must make an effort to celebrate all the festivals nationwide to help more Indians to celebrate their culture and enjoy themselves.
Already, we see how UP is doing this in a grand way in Ayodhya and Kasi, and people around India feel good about it. The govt incentivized public celebrations must be brought to every city and every public square for every festival.
The spaces the DS and its red-green cabal use to destabilize India must be made into spaces that unite and celebrate India.
CONSTITUTIONAL WAYS TO ELIMINATE THE GENERAL CATEGORY…👇
1. Charge them the highest fees.
2. Keep their eligibility age limit the lowest.
3. Reduce the number of posts allocated to them.
4. Candidates from other categories cannot claim their vacant seats.
5. Candidates from all other categories can claim their vacant seats.
6.Keep their cut-off marks the high...
It seems that the general class is just there to be crushed.
@Bryozi Glad someone said it. I’d rather have cut scenes than to read a ton of words on a screen it ruins the pacing of the game and gets boring very fast.
The issue of the NEET-PG qualifying cut-off dropping so low that minus 40 marks qualified reached the Supreme Court.
The Court sought the Centre's opinion.
The Centre set up a 12-member expert committee, which proposed replacing marks-based merit with a rank-based system. The National Medical Commission approved it, and the proposal is now before the Court.
This is a clever fix! The headline "Rank 2,00,000 secured MS Orthopedics in NEET-PG" sounds far less alarming to the public than "Candidate with minus 40 marks secured MS Orthopedics."
Problem solved, outrage avoided, and public trust in the medical system restored.