50ulC0d3r

Starve the EGO, feed the SOUL...

[50ulC0d3r @Intembauzyo]

For some reason, I feel like when $Qubic hits the $0.01 mark, it will not stop there. Of course, many will sell hoping to buy back lower, but this thing will just keep shooting higher because new money will flow in as the world would have woken up to the reality that $Qubic is.

[50ulC0d3r @Intembauzyo]

@FMwenge Is his drinking affecting his studies? Is he skipping class? Is he engaging in any questionable dealings that might jeopardize his schooling? Is his drinking seemingly out of control that he focuses more on it than on books?
Sometimes we judge these kids harshly.

[50ulC0d3r @Intembauzyo]

@sheilatebra The goal was to make Job to denounce God.

[50ulC0d3r @Intembauzyo]

@RyukShenlee No. Never

[Sheila of the Most High @sheilatebra]

was reading the book of John, and when I got to the part where Judas betrayed Jesus .“when Satan entered him”. it made me so uncomfortable.
At first, I didn’t understand why. I even had this feeling like I wanted to stop reading.
Then questions started running through my mind:
If he was following Jesus, why did Satan enter him?
I thought when you’re a Christian, you’re covered?

But as I kept reading and really thinking about it, something hit me:
Judas was following Jesus… but was his heart really with Him?
Later it says Judas was keeping the money bag and stealing from it.
Then he agreed to betray Jesus for 30 pieces of silver.

It wasn’t sudden.
It was gradual.

Small compromises.
Hidden sin.
Little lies.

That’s why it says first the devil “put it into his heart”… and later Satan entered him.

And then it became personal.
I realized God wasn’t just showing me Judas He was revealing something in me.
I saw my own “small” lies.
The little compromises I’ve been excusing.
And I felt like I was on the verge of falling into sin.
In that moment, I felt God correcting me, pulling me back.
I cried.
Because I realized if I keep entertaining these small things, they won’t stay small.
They will grow.
And God, in His mercy, is warning me before I sink.
This wasn’t just a story anymore.
It was a wake-up call.

[50ulC0d3r @Intembauzyo]

@tallzedgirl Whatever Bumpy Johnson did to the UPND must be big for them to sideline him like this.
But something tells me he will bounce back, especially for the 2031 run.

[50ulC0d3r @Intembauzyo]

@_AndreasHuebner AMEN

[Steve McQueen @TheCryptoEscape]

$QUBIC, it is funny when you look at early Bitcoin addresses and the statement by Satoshi "just by chance I have my initials"

Basically they were stating to Hal Finney that they had just thought of an idea that some day in the future that people could brute force create custom addresses

They then said that they had their initials at the start of a very early Bitcoin address by complete luck 😅

It always felt to me like this was Satoshi low key trolling Finney

He was pretending that he couldn't custom create an address but just coincidentally had his initials in an address

Only a few hours later, block 264 was created and it begins with the initials CfB: https://t.co/TKgdL4YQha

Then on further viewing of the 4th Bitcoin address, we see it begins with the name Qubic (using Base58): https://t.co/kndPEPyvIc

Incredible coincidences, but only recently I realized that the Bitcoin genesis address looks very like a custom created address because it begins with the characters 1A1z

This is the full address: 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa

How likely is it that the first Bitcoin address ever created would have the character 1 followed by the first letter of the alphabet (A) and the next character 1 is followed by the last letter of the alphabet

Big coincidence

The first block is called the "Genesis" block

Genesis in the bible is the beginning

And the opening of the genesis address is the beginning and end of the alphabet

So what next @c___f___b ? Revelation in 2027?

[Bitcoin Magazine @BitcoinMagazine]

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 President Trump's Crypto Czar David Sacks says, “After market structure passes, Banks will get fully into crypto” 🙌

[Qubic @_Qubic_]

Qubic has officially launched fiat on & off-ramps with Banxa.

✅ Buy QUBIC with card or bank
✅ Sell back to fiat
✅ 100+ countries live (US & UK included)
✅ No CEX required

This is a major step toward real-world accessibility.

[zuqka ױ @zuqkaX]

What if the next architecture makes every existing chain look outdated

What if Bitcoin proved that decentralized consensus was possible, but the block model it introduced was also the root of its limits.
Block races.
Forks.
Difficulty swings.
And a design that could not natively support computation.

What if Proof of Work was brilliant at securing honesty but terrible at using its computational output.
Millions of machines spending energy to produce nothing but a random number.

What if Proof of Stake tried to fix energy waste but introduced new problems.
Centralization.
Stake grinding.
Wealth deciding truth.
And still no deterministic compute.

What if DAGs attempted to remove block ordering but created new forms of nondeterminism, unbounded concurrency, and the need for external rules to establish finality.
No global tick.
No single timeline.
No guaranteed convergence.

What if someone noticed that the real bottleneck was not hashing or staking, but timing.
No blockchain could guarantee that two independent nodes executed the same operation at the same moment in the same way.

What if someone read Nick Szabo’s quorum paper and realized that overlapping majorities could create a single global state that cannot fork.
A system where two conflicting majorities are mathematically impossible.

What if this idea surfaced publicly in 2012 in a strange Bitcointalk thread that almost no one understood at the time.
A model based on coordinated computation rather than block production.
Ticks instead of blocks.
Quorum instead of longest chain.

What if the same mind that invented the first Proof of Stake system and the first practical DAG later returned to this idea and pushed it further.
Removing the operating system.
Removing nondeterministic kernel scheduling.
Removing Linux sockets.
Removing everything that could introduce noise between nodes.

What if this person asked a different question.
Not how to chain blocks.
Not how to choose leaders.
Not how to reward stake.
But how to make hundreds of machines compute the exact same result at the exact same time with bit level precision.

What if the answer required writing a custom microkernel.
A custom scheduler.
A custom memory manager.
A custom network stack.
A system that boots through UEFI and takes control of hardware directly, so that nothing interferes with execution.

What if miners stopped hashing random data and instead trained neural networks.
Actual useful work.
Work that builds a global intelligence layer rather than wasting cycles.

What if every tick of the network produced the next deterministic state.
Not a block.
Not a guess.
Not a probabilistic fork choice.
But a computed truth agreed on by 451 or more machines.

What if the ledger was not a chain of blocks but a synchronized spectrum of state transitions.
One timeline.
No reorgs.
No ambiguity.
No need for confirmation depth.

What if the entire architecture was built around determinism rather than probability.
Execution instead of mining.
Computation instead of politics.
Mathematics instead of heuristics.

What if all the experiments across PoW, PoS, DAGs, leader selection, scheduling tricks, and consensus gadgets were steps toward this one idea.

What if the real breakthrough was not a new token standard or a new block format.
But a new class of system entirely.

The architecture has a name.
Qubic.
CfB’s opus magnum.

$QUBIC https://t.co/HoLwhjkEKp

[Qubic @_Qubic_]

Yann LeCun just left Meta and dropped a bomb: LLMs (ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama) are a dead end.

His quote at MIT: "Nobody in their right mind would use LLMs of the type that we have today" within 3-5 years.

LeCun's alternative? World Models. AI that learns causal understanding from visual data, like a child learning physics.

This is exactly what $QUBIC has been quietly building for years. The future of AGI isn't just large text data. It's comprehensive, causal understanding.

[50ulC0d3r @Intembauzyo]

Only a matter of time $Qubic will dominate.

"While your favorite influencer tweets about AI stocks…
the AI billionaires themselves are buying crypto.
Why?
Because AI needs decentralized data.
Blockchain is the nervous system.
AI → Crypto — nothing will stop it." ~ @bnbchen

[50ulC0d3r @Intembauzyo]

Picture this: The entire crypto market is in a confirmed bear market. Everything is bleeding and scary. Then out of nowhere, $Qubic starts pumping...real hard. Do you have any idea how much attention this would shine on #Qubic? I think an own bullrun would be more parabolic.

[David Vivancos - e/acc @VivancosDavid]

Finally Neuraxon is out!!!
Our new paper & code & demo by @josesanchezhb & @VivancosDavid expanding on the @_Qubic_ #Aigarth #intelligenttissue by @c___f__@c___f___b the path towards #TrueAI

"A New Neural Growth & Computation Blueprint" one step forward to #AGI & #ASI

Read the preprint Paper: https://t.co/fNiqAWFyiS
(All the details of our ongoing research)

Explore the Code: https://t.co/SJuYIL0BOA
(Please give us a⭐fork and build!)

Play with the Interactive Demo: https://t.co/h5Cl3hu5uS
(Build your own Neuraxon NetWork)

@karpathy do you want to give it a try?
@beffjezos can we try it on @extropic hw?

And more to come stay tuned! #EAGI #Neuraxon #Trinarystates #Continuousprocessing #Synapticdynamics #Neuralplasticity #Spontaneousactivity #Temporalsynchronisation #Bioinspiredcomputation #Artificiology

[50ulC0d3r @Intembauzyo]

@TheShaneNation @FMwenge Via Zambia

[50ulC0d3r @Intembauzyo]

@DrJoLynneW AMEN AND AMEN

[50ulC0d3r @Intembauzyo]

@Vottun @StellarOrg @Qubic @REDISBE @Alastria_ @BSVAssociation @cryptoplaza_es @mmerge_io @AdaVaughan When bridge?

[50ulC0d3r @Intembauzyo]

@_Qubic_ is rewriting history. Traditional LLMs are simply parrots. Aigarth embraces the complexity of a third option, the power of uncertainty. This makes it more efficient and biologically plausible and inherently more honest and resilient. Simply groundbreaking!

[Qubic @_Qubic_]

New science from the Qubic Scientific Team is here! 🔬

Unpacking the "Aigarth Ternary Paradox," this article highlights the significant advantages of Qubic's Aigarth AI model's ternary training approach over traditional binary systems.

Dive in and see the difference! ⏬