There’s a well-known phenomenon in the facial aesthetics literature whereby “average faces” (that is, faces formed by superimposing many faces atop one another) tend to be more attractive than the average person.
This may be counterintuitive, but it makes sense when you consider the following: Individual faces are all slightly flawed, from a beauty perspective, in idiosyncratic ways. And when you average lots of faces, you average out all of these minor issues. So, an “average face” is errorless and looks quite pleasant as a result.
However, another thing you’ll notice about these “average faces” is that none of them could be models. They’re more attractive than the average human, yes, but less attractive than the most attractive humans.
This is because extremely attractive faces tend to have certain features that are, mathematically, extreme. (For example, male models tend to have lower-set brows and larger jawbones than you would see in any average face.)
Recently, I have begun to wonder if LLM-writing faces a similar challenge. It’s always “more attractive than average,” because all of the flaws of normal human writing have been averaged out. But it's also missing the unusual taste and style of the best human writers I've read. In my experience, it's only ever 85%-good; like an "average face," it's never flawed, but equally, it's never exceptionally beautiful.
"Georges-Louis Bouchez a non seulement placé la barre du népotisme là où ses prédécesseurs socialistes n’auraient jamais imaginé la placer, mais aussi rompu avec une de ses promesses de campagne."
Merci pour cet edito parfait
https://t.co/l9KeBRQB37
BREAKING: MIT just completed the first brain scan study of ChatGPT users & the results are terrifying.
Turns out, AI isn't making us more productive. It's making us cognitively bankrupt.
Here's what 4 months of data revealed:
(hint: we've been measuring productivity all wrong)
Malgré un sentiment anti-immigration et sécuritaire similaire à la France, la Wallonie a voté à 2,8% pour l'extrême-droite aux européennes, tandis que la Flandre votait pour elle à 48% et la France à 37%. Oui, 2,8%. Avec @societyofficiel, on s'est demandés : mais pourquoi ? 1/12
"J’ai fait rentrer la parole de ceux qu’on ne connaît pas : les livreurs, les chauffeurs VTC… Et ce, grâce à un outil magique, que je mets à leur disposition : l’interprétation."https://t.co/81sTgRllDz
Belgium is showing the way on the #Gaza crisis.
✅ Condemned 7/10 killings by Palestinian armed groups;
✅ Questioned legality of some Israeli airstrikes;
✅ Condemned Israel's collective punishment of Palestinians & called for targeted sanctions on those responsible;
1/n
"Le terrorisme n’existe pas en droit international", répond Agnès Callamard, face à des critiques émises contre Amnesty International. "Il n’a pas de définition juridique. Ce que le Hamas a fait, c’est un crime de guerre, ça pourrait même être un crime contre l’Humanité."
Can ChatGPT explain why two interpreters per language are needed for simultaneous interpreting? Nope. I wonder how much false information is published by people using ChatGPT to write about topics they know nothing about. If I didn't know better, I might have believed this: