Pro-aborts have a fondness for this fallacy. They like to make the declaration that your points are invalid if you don't adopt, foster, or take care of someone with a disability.
Those things do not invalidate moral claims.
@LibertyLog1776@Fair_and_Biased That's a Tu Quoque fallacy
Even if she doesn't help people with Down Syndrome it doesn't make the moral claim false. Your response is deflection and logically unsound.
You're deflecting into metaphysics to dodge the biology. We don’t need deep philosophy to know a new human organism exists: it has its own unique Homo sapiens DNA from fertilization, distinct from the mother. That’s measurable science. Conscious self-awareness comes later — but species membership doesn’t depend on it. Stick to the actual argument: being human is what matters, not viability.
@LibertyLog1776@Fair_and_Biased That's a Tu Quoque fallacy
Even if she doesn't help people with Down Syndrome it doesn't make the moral claim false. Your response is deflection and logically unsound.
“Mind your own business” (a non-argument) doesn’t work when human life is involved.
A nearly viable baby was killed for a chromosomal difference.
If they’d killed it a day AFTER birth, would “mind your own business” bc it was “their decision” cut it?
The purpose of posts like this are to shut down conversation. They make statements, don't defend them, pretend it's a non-negotiable fact because they have no tolerance for someone else having a different opinion.
When over a million human fetuses and embryos are being killed in the USA every year, most of the time due to inconvenience and the success of decades of dehumanization strategies coming primarily from radical feminists, you better believe we're going to be talking about it.
The purpose of posts like this are to shut down conversation. They make statements, don't defend them, pretend it's a non-negotiable fact because they have no tolerance for someone else having a different opinion.
When over a million human fetuses and embryos are being killed in the USA every year, most of the time due to inconvenience and the success of decades of dehumanization strategies coming primarily from radical feminists, you better believe we're going to be talking about it.
@TheKingScxottyD It's an opinion that doesn't have the right to silence other opinions. It's not even an argument. It is frequently used because people incorrectly believe that shuts down a conversation
@missinformstion Human from conception. Embryology proves that. Personhood is philosophical and irrelevant. Why people choose to have abortions doesn't erase that. Your argument, just like the one above proves nothing.