Patriot🇺🇸 Fighting by Faith🙏🏻

John Maxwell Certified Speaker and Coach. Certified Health Coach IIN. Business builder. multiple 6 fig. income earner. Happily married. Proud mom of 3 and Oma.

[Patriot🇺🇸 Fighting by Faith🙏🏻 @IrmaMospan]

I am an immigrant🇩🇪 from Germany and now a proud citizen 🇺🇸 of the United States. I don’t expect you @realDonaldTrump to read this message, but I want to tell you thank you for fighting so hard for our nation, our freedom, and our country.

[Patriot🇺🇸 Fighting by Faith🙏🏻 @IrmaMospan]

Wow. Powerful.

[Orlando Curioso @Orlando71156528]

Aquí aparece la "primera dama", departiendo animadamente con 2️⃣ personas a las que dice, que jamás conoció. Acá se lo recordamos.

[Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 @DiligentDenizen]

‼️🇺🇸: Melania Trump used to work as a model of Donald's friend Paolo Zampolli.

In a nasty divorce, Zampolli allegedly had Trump use ICE to deport his ex-wife Amanda Ungaro.

Amanda is now set to do an interview this weekend and TELL ALL about Melania, Epstein, Trump and Zampolli.

This was what Melanie's press random press conference was about yesterday.

They're trying to get ahead of a B0MBSHELL. 👀🍿

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

The 25th amendment needs to be invoked. He is a genocidal lunatic. Our Congress and military need to intervene. We are beyond madness.

[Patriot🇺🇸 Fighting by Faith🙏🏻 @IrmaMospan]

@ProjectConstitu This is crazy

[Project Constitution @ProjectConstitu]

🚨 THE SMOKING GUN: Leaked DOJ Wiretap Audio Captures Erika Kirk Scheduling Underage Girls for Epstein 😱

I have been sent a bombshell audio file, and I have verified its authenticity. This is not a rumor. This is not a theory. This is a recorded phone call from the DOJ's own website, hidden in plain sight within the released Epstein Files (DataSet 9). The direct link is posted below for anyone to check in the:

This audio captures a young girl, who is clearly an informant for the DOJ, on a recorded phone call with ERIKA KIRK. You can hear the DOJ agents coaching the girl before and after the call. This was their second attempt to get Erika to incriminate herself and Jeffrey Epstein.

The voice is undeniably Erika Kirk's. There is no mistaking it.

And what she says on that call is absolutely damning.

In the audio, Erika confirms she is working directly with Jeffrey Epstein. The informant asks about getting paid, and Erika lays it all out. She says, "The more you do, the more you get paid." She then reveals her specific role: she is the one making the schedule for the young girl.

But the most horrifying part is when the informant says, "I can bring my sister too so you can get paid more money for her also." Erika's response? "Yeah, well, that's what I'm saying. I'm working tomorrow, and me and him are gonna put a schedule together for you and your sister."

Let that sink in. Erika Kirk was not just an associate. She was a scheduler. A procurer. She was getting a commission or kickback for providing young girls to Epstein's child sex trafficking ring.

This is DIRECT, undeniable proof from the Department of Justice's own evidence locker that links Erika Kirk to the core of Epstein's criminal enterprise.

This is a HUGE story. This is the confirmation we've been waiting for. The DOJ had this evidence all along.

The DOJ had this file. Why wasn't this the headline on every news channel in the world? Share this everywhere. They can't hide this anymore.

Tag @RealCandaceO and RT. This needs to be frontpage news everywhere.

[Harrison H. Smith ✞ @HarrisonHSmith]

I might get killed for posting this, the least you could do is watch it.

[Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald]

Charlie Kirk, in June of 2025, explaining why a massive US war against Iran, and an attempt to facilitate regime change, as pushed by people like Lindsey Graham, is "pathologically insane":

[Stew Peters @realstewpeters]

Charlie Kirk’s murder cover-up is going terribly, so Bongino has been reassigned to spearhead a new unit whose objective is to eliminate Candace Owens.

[Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸 @EvanAKilgore]

June 17th, 2025

Charlie Kirk says a US-backed regime change war in Iran would be a total disaster for the US.

He called it "pathologically insane" to assume things would be better afterwards.

Now I know why they wanted him dead.

[Patriot🇺🇸 Fighting by Faith🙏🏻 @IrmaMospan]

@1Nicdar ✅

[Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 @mtgreenee]

I did not campaign for this.
I did not donate money for this.
I did not vote for this, in elections or Congress.
This is heartbreaking and tragic.
And how many more innocent will die?
What about our own military?
This is not what we thought MAGA was supposed to be.
Shame!

[Parody Jeff @Parodyjeffx]

Hillary Clinton raped Cathy O’Brien.

She testified under oath to Congress in 1977.

Bill Clinton used her too.
Sex slave for the elite.

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

Means a lot coming from you! 🙏

[TPV Sean @tpvsean]

TPUSA Insider Feared Dead After Releasing Proof Israel Killed Charlie Kirk

The whistleblower who first blew the lid off Turning Point USA's shadowy ties to Israel, and new CEO Erika Kirk's direct connections to international orphan trafficking networks - is missing, feared dead.

[ELIZABETH LANE @imelizabethlane]

I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is.

I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath.

What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain:

That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her.

Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.)

Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance.

Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity.

Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure.

Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power.

What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker.

Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride.

What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time.

In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks!

It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely!

Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing.

Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came.

What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion.

This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this shit.