Olivia
Online
Irony
@IronyInLawsSIFF
Its high time to adopt Gender Neutral laws to save Indian family fabric
Police station and Courts
Joined February 2026
71 Following
27 Followers
313 Posts
I feel for the #NEET paper leak victims. It’s an injustice, so are the innocent MEN who are falsely accused under #498A #85BNS and facing extortion in the name of #maintenance and #alimony. It’s an INJUSTICE !!! too
Tip of the Day —
Knowledge of RTI is important for every person.
Most people think RTI is only for activists or journalists.
Wrong.
RTI is your legal right to seek information and demand accountability from public authorities.
Police station delaying your complaint?
Police doing illegal stuff?
Government office not giving you documents?
FIR status unclear?
Your application sitting on someone’s table for months?
Use RTI. Get the answer in writing.
Ask for the status. Ask for the action taken. Ask for the reasons for delay. Create a paper trail.
RTI can be extremely useful in exposing delays, obtaining information and holding public authorities accountable.
Ignorance of your rights keeps you powerless.
Learn how to file an RTI.
Learn where to file it.
Learn how to follow up when there is a delay.
RTI knowledge isn’t optional. It’s basic self-defence in a system where you may otherwise keep waiting for answers.
This is a very informative and important message. We need to spread it widely so that more innocent men are aware of their rights and do not get trapped or intimidated by police calls. Awareness can help people stay calm, understand the proper legal procedure, and take the right steps instead of acting out of fear or pressure.
With your due permission, I will also share this message as an image so that it can reach more people. ☺️
Tip of the day:
Never go to a police station merely because a police officer calls you.
There is a clear judgment of the Supreme Court on this.
For offences punishable with less than 7 years’ imprisonment, arrest is not supposed to be the first step. The police are required to issue a notice of appearance under Section 41A CrPC where applicable.
So don’t walk into a police station just because someone says, “Come over for a few questions.”
Always ask the officer to issue a written Notice of Appearance instead of relying on a phone call.
Know your rights before you enter the police station.
SC can give directions to power courts to punish false cases filer
Women always cry about safety and hygiene in public transport—buses, metros and trains.
And then they get reserved seats, reserved coaches and special facilities including special pink toilets.
If safety and comfort are really the reason, then why should everyone else pay for these additional facilities?
Trains historically have different fares for different classes. More comfort and better facilities = higher fare.
So if women want separate coaches, reserved spaces and additional facilities in the name of safety and hygiene, why not charge them accordingly?
Or is “safety” just a convenient justification for special privileges in less price?
Let the government stop treating every demand as a vote-bank opportunity.
If it is a premium facility, charge a premium fare.
That’s equality..!
Two paths.
Two destinies.
Left: False 498A + adultery + divorce = broken home & crying child
Right: Faith + family + Varalakshmi Vratam = pure blessings
Stop misusing matrimonial laws.
Save families.
Choose wisely. What you do comes back.
🙏
#False498A #SaveFamilies #StopMisuseOfLaws #FamilyFirst #VaralakshmiVratam
Another solid win against misuse of the DV Act.
Delhi Court has made it clear:
A brother-in-law or sister-in-law cannot simply be dragged into DV proceedings when there was never any shared household or domestic relationship with the complainant.
Additional Sessions Judge Dr. Sumedh Kumar Sethi, Shahdara, Karkardooma, set aside the trial court’s order and deleted both relatives from the case.
The message is simple:
Mere matrimonial relation is NOT enough.
The law requires an actual domestic relationship and “shared household”.
You cannot name distant relatives first and expect them to spend years in court proving that they were never part of the domestic setup.
A family dispute is not a licence to put every relative on trial.
V & Anr. v. M
CA No. 263/2024
Good judgment. ⚖️
True Feminism?
Equality when convenient, empowerment when questioned, and accountability nowhere.
Rights without responsibility isn’t feminism.
It’s privilege wearing a feminist label.
Why?
There is no IF. No BUT.
Ban alimony. Ban it JUST.
If a woman is allegedly thrown out of her matrimonial home, she should start earning—just like a son who gets thrown out by his father when he refuses to follow the rules of the house.
Simple.
And if alimony can be justified with endless ifs and buts, then by the same logic, why not call dowry “reasonable” too, provided someone else carries the burden?
You cannot demand consistency only when it benefits you.
She cooked up a dowry and assault case against her husband.
The court found the husband was in Saudi Arabia when the alleged incidents took place.
Husband: ACQUITTED.
Wife: 10 DAYS IN JAIL.
So much for the “women are always victims” narrative.
When women weaponise laws against men and fabricate allegations, they are not victims—they are abusing the system.
And this time, the system bit back.
Lag gai fir se 😂😂😂😂
These aunties think Tweeter is like other social media accounts where feminist can have open platforms to abuse men.
But x tweeter is now gender neutral…
Indian courts say:
Don’t stalk your wife if she is going to hotels.
Don’t hire a detective to find out if she is working while claiming to be unemployed.
Don’t expose her affair.
Don’t collect evidence.
Don’t produce documents to defend yourself.
Don’t install a camera in your own house to protect yourself from false allegations.
And apparently, don’t even talk about it.
BUT…
If you prove her affair, she may not get alimony.
So the question is simple:
How exactly are you supposed to prove it if every attempt to find and preserve the evidence is treated as illegal?
Evidence doesn’t magically appear in court.
Should Domestic Violence Law Be Gender-Neutral?
“Why can’t husbands be beaten up? Where is the law for that?”
If domestic violence is wrong, it is wrong regardless of who commits it.
A husband being beaten, threatened, humiliated or abused should have the same legal protection as a wife.
Domestic violence should be about the violence — not the gender of the victim.
So now,
The judicial system want to stop husbands from collecting evidence against wives’ adultery and maintenance claims too?
The Supreme Court has called for regulation of private investigators and detectives, particularly as their services are increasingly used to collect evidence in matrimonial disputes.
A husband produces 92 videos and 237 photographs allegedly showing his wife’s adulterous relationship, and suddenly the focus shifts to how the evidence was collected.
No, private detectives should not be regulated.
Why?
Because if adultery can disqualify a wife from maintenance, a husband must also have a apractical way to prove it.
Otherwise, how is a husband supposed to defend himself against an unjustified maintenance claim?
Women are more cruel than men but it is purposefully hidden from us.
Continue of My Friend's GWOP Mediation Experience .
Today my friend attended his final GWOP mediation.
Mediator: So, what have you decided?
Friend: Madam, first of all, thank you for conducting these mediation sessions. I attended every mediation in good faith, hoping we could reach an amicable solution.
Mediator: So you are not agreeing to leave your parents?
Friend: Madam, I love my wife, I love my son and I also love my parents. It is my responsibility to take care of my aged parents as well as my wife and child. I don't want to break any family. I am willing to take my wife and son back home.
Mediator (to wife): What have you decided?
Wife: I cannot go there. He must leave his parents and stay separately.
Mediator (to friend): Why can't you stay separately for one year?
Friend: Madam, forget one year. I am even willing to give our relationship another six months to rebuild trust. But after all these years, when a false 498A case has been filed against me and my parents because I did not leave my parents, how can trust return overnight? Let her come back and let us rebuild trust.
Mediator (to wife): What do you say?
Wife: I will not stay with his parents.
Mediator: If he is not ready to leave his parents, then let the 498A case continue. Let him lose his job.
Friend: If someone files a false 498A case because her demand to separate her husband from his parents was not accepted, then let the case continue. If I lose my job, the Government also loses one more taxpayer. That is the unfortunate consequence of misuse of the law.
Mediator: Tomorrow when your son grows up, he will scold you.
Friend: Madam, tomorrow when my son grows up, he may also ask his mother why she kept him away from his father's love and affection.
Mediator: Why would he scold his mother? No child scolds his mother.
Friend: Then why is it acceptable if he blames only his father? Shouldn't both parents be accountable for their own decisions?
(The mediator remained silent.)
Mediator: My own son is getting married. I would ask him to stay separately after marriage.
Wife: Exactly. Why do people marry if they don't want to stay away from their parents?
Friend: Then why do families search for a groom from a "good family" with living parents before marriage, but after marriage insist that those same parents must be left behind? If someone never wants to live with a husband's parents under any circumstances, that expectation should be discussed honestly before marriage.
(The mediator again remained silent.)
Mediator: Shall I mark the mediation report as Not Settled?
Friend: I came here in good faith hoping for an amicable solution, not to break my family.
Mediator: Okay. Sign here.
(Both parties signed.)
Wife: Thank you, Madam.
Friend: Thank you very much, Madam.
Mediator: Don't thank me. You didn't follow my suggestion.
Friend: That's alright, Madam. I still appreciate the time and effort you put into the mediation. Have a good day.
Conclusion - How the matrimonial laws Fe being misused to harrass Husband and keeping child father relationship at stake.
A friend's experience...
His wife wanted him to leave his aged parents and live separately. He refused because he believed it was his responsibility to care for them.
Soon after, she filed a 498A case against him and his parents.
Later, he filed a Guardianship/Ward petition seeking only weekend visitation and daily video calls with his son.
Mediator: "Why can't you stay separately from your parents for one year?"
Friend: "My parents are aged and depend on me. It's my responsibility to care for them. I also love my wife and son. I don't want to abandon my parents, and I don't want to lose my wife and child."
Mediator: "Then how can reconciliation happen?"
Friend: "I even suggested living in a separate portion of the same house while my parents stayed on another floor. I'm willing to compromise, but I cannot abandon my aged parents."
Wife: "I will not stay with his parents."
Friend: "If reconciliation isn't possible, then please focus on my son's welfare. I only asked for regular video calls and weekend visitation because every child deserves both parents."
Outcome: No settlement. Mediation was adjourned.
When a husband chooses to fulfill his responsibility toward his aged parents, should that result in criminal litigation against him and his family? Cases like this raise serious concerns about the misuse of Section 498A and about a system that can end up forcing families apart instead of encouraging practical solutions.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.1M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
113.5M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.5M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.7M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.5M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.4M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
74.9M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
72.6M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.7M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
65.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.8M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.5M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers