The latest Royal Studies Podcast episode is now out! Join Royal Studies Journal @royalstjournal special issue guest editor Cathleen Sarti and RSJ editor @monarchyconf for this extra special double feature all about the RSJ's issue on "Defining Aristocracy".
🧵1/14
Our second paper from @Isacsson_Alex was formally titled ‘The Gift-Giving of a Sidestepped Royal Heir: The gifts and court of Duke Johan of Sweden, 1600-1618’—but he has changed it & I couldn’t type fast enough! However, we are still hearing about Duke Johan ‘a royal spare’ #KQ13
SHF-bloggen är tillbaka efter sommaruppehållet! Vi inleder på temat avhandlingsnytt:
I avhandlingen "Att definiera ett hertigskap" analyserar @Isacsson_Alex relationerna mellan hertigar och kungar i Sverige under perioden 1556 till 1662.
https://t.co/KWiZjl2Kn8
Prins Harry är inte ensam om sin roll som ”Spare”. @Isacsson_Alex lyfter i sin avhandling fram doldisar i den svenska historien också varit reserver – och som tidvis ställt till det för regenten.
https://t.co/BPDV5GFLC0
Great paper from @katkosior illuminating Anna Jagiellon’s unusual case as a quasi-regnant queen in an elective monarchy—now we move northward to @Isacsson_Alex “Opening the window to female succession: Revising the Swedish succession pact in 1590 and 1604” #FemaleSuccession
New @courtstudies blog post has been published. Check out Alexander Isacsson’s post on “Giving Shape to 'Dynasty' in Later Sixteenth Century Sweden”, here: https://t.co/FxVl5hIPiZ
Interested in writing a blog post for @courtstudies? Send proposal email to [email protected].
@CathleenSarti @monarchyconf@TheresaEarenfi1@SZM131 That is a valid point. But a focus on the mobilisation of resources (how and to what end) could perhaps introduce specificity without risking female agency and male power divide?
All good things come to an end and this is the final day of my twitter takeover. I have enjoyed sharing some of my research with you all! Today I ask you #twitterstorians and historians of #royalstudies and #courtstudies to share your wisdom with me @Isacsson_Alex 1/6
@mirellamarini1 I completely agree that we should think of dynasty as theory, and that it can be used in a way similar to gender in historical research!
Good morning! Today is the 4th day of my #courtstudies takeover and I would like to share with you two challenges I have faced when working on my project in dynastic #History and #royalstudies@Isacsson_Alex 1/7
@mirellamarini1 What an interesting thought! It raises the question of how to read and interpret #genealogy as #earlymodernists and in #royalstudies. It is something I am still struggling with, so any helpful suggestions are most welcome!
Hello! Today I @Isacsson_Alex will give some examples of how Duke Karl used his court and patronage to express dynastic identification and position himself as the head a house in the 1590s when he was in open conflict with his nephew King Sigismund #earlymodern#courtstudies 1/7
@dorothee_goetze @CathleenSarti @CourtStudies I think Karl was more focused on establishing himself as a ruling duke in the 1570s, but the defense of the title suggests that he in no way wanted to give up his standing and privilege as hereditary prince.