Yes, I understand what you are saying. As I said there’s no substance fundamentally on the debate and much of it was lost in semantics.
The “allowed to think” was a part of a conversation and I felt in that Moment it has a certain weight, because neither sides could state what they wanted to prove. So the all conversation was, if you are allowed to infer based of the data you have, then I am allowed to infer because the data you have literally is faulty or doesn’t point to any prove whatsoever.
The other part of my comment is still valid. The whole narrative is blantly weak and I think Candace didn’t really use this point well in the debate. She could easily ask about the paving for example, she could ask Andrew clear video evidences of Tyler which no one still has and so on.
Candace point is , if all the narrative against Tyler is obviously weak and no one is answering the basic questions, then you can assume that the person is not the culprit.
On the other hand, again, AW didn’t really know anything about the case, regardless of Candace position. His questions were neither precise not relevant to the conversation because he didn’t know the whole story and details so couldn’t really pin point any direction in the conversation.
You cannot say I believe that he’s guilty because I believe the narrative. Because that was literally the point of the debate, to prove that the narrative you believe is strong enough for you to believe that
@RealCandaceO@MrsErikaKirk@AndrewKolvet I am dropping a 100% real text messages between AW and TPUSA
I swear it’s not made with ChatGPT image 2, it’s real real like…..super real. I can confirm it and you all should believe it without any questions or doubts!
@RedPilled_Siren@gatorgar 🚨🚨I am dropping 100% real text messages between AW and TPUSA
I swear it’s not made with ChatGPT image 2, it’s real real like…..super real.
@realhonestash@paleochristcon I am dropping 100% real text messages between AW and TPUSA
I swear it’s not made with ChatGPT image 2, it’s real real like…..super real.
@RealCandaceO Can you release the full video on the next show please as now they are claiming you edited it just because you cropped the ceiling 😂 show the ceiling so they are happy (or sad probably)
@HurtsTruf@RealCandaceO But she did tho 😂 she literally said on her show she this is the original ration. Maybe it’s cropped but that doesn’t mean it’s fake
@PawleSardano@RealCandaceO So this is the new narrative? 😂 she’s showing the original ratio and you are like…noooo the very weird one is the one to really look at
@much_lose@CarmenEstel@CinemaShogun All good bro , thinking that calling me simp can affect me somehow like if I was born yesterday 😂 the fact you are changing the topic of your argument shows a lot lot
@much_lose@CarmenEstel@CinemaShogun What about you just tell someone who you are taking to their home as normal human being would do rather than hiding it for any whatsoever reason after being asked multiple times. It’s exhausting how people like you try to twist basic behavioural courtesy.
You know your offences don’t even land here do you 😂 I couldn’t care less.
They didn’t hire a contractor for doing work inside a home. What kind of stupid twist is this 😂😂 what a shit take man
It was a debate of high stakes with names from one side and (no names) from the others. They asked them to provide the names and points of contacts and they were left with no info, and Andrew’s team also breached the contract recording outside the studio which was not allowed.
Anyway I will leave you at that :) let’s see how this goes