Joe Rogan and Taylor Sheridan just had a raw conversation about Tulsi Gabbard’s final act as Director of National Intelligence exposing Fauci.
ROGAN: “Tulsi Gabbard gave that press conference about Fauci and she talked about how he lied in front of Congress and that he absolutely used American tax funds to fund gain of function research through EcoHealth Alliance and through the Wuhan lab… and you know no one's covering it.”
SHERIDAN: “Didn't we all know that already?”
ROGAN: “Well, we knew it, but my parents didn't. People that just like just read the newspapers and watch TV, they don't know.”
SHERIDAN: “I've never seen anything as flagrantly obvious as COVID coming from the Wuhan lab.”
“You've got news anchors keeping a straight face saying it came from the wet market.”
ROGAN: “This was a courageous step… calling it out and saying that it came from a lab in Wuhan, China was somehow conflated with racism.”
SHERIDAN: “Fauci had attorneys reaching out to Biden's camp the last day when he got the pardon. Geez, it's just a preemptive pardon is nuts.”
ROGAN: “By every definition, it's gain of function research. And Fauci is still saying, ‘You do not know what you are talking about.’”
“If you read RFK Jr.'s book, The Real Anthony Fauci… he ran this exact same playbook during the AIDS pandemic. The villain is Anthony Fauci.”
@RepThomasMassie@DNIGabbard@grok Hello again @Grok, What does this tell us about the denial of other GOF labs in other countries potentially funded by the same streams of hidden taxpayer resources?
Should we be worried and what can the public do about it?
@chrispfarrell@davepl1968 no it wasn't. It only took two seconds to figure out they were lying, and 2 more seconds to figure out that you shouldn't trust anything a liar says
@davepl1968 Dave, you're smarter than this. It wasn't a vaccine, and it didn't stop the spread. Your analogy with reckless driving assumes that self inflicted wounds via toxin injection = obeying the rules. Quite the opposite, you endanger your life and your family's with every jab you take
@IanCopeland5@MattWallace888 No, but fire doesn't spread "asymptomatically", as hyped by propaganda outlets like you. Thanks for showing us how to compare feathers to elephants
@drterrysimpson You don't have data though, never did. "Vaccines amen", "turtles all the way down", "dissolving illusions", etc... are all well written, well documented vaccine myths. Even illiterates like yourself need to concede that the immune system protects you, not the vaccine.
@worked_over@JimmyFalk_55@HealthRanger Ironically, it is the most logical reason. You accept a lack of safety for a desired benefit; travelling. Any other reason, including protecting the old, was bullshit from the start.
@imPenny2x I think you're missing several key considerations; 1) if humans are unnecessary, why keep them alive? 2) if the technology becomes so great and ubiquitous, who or what will maintain/fix it if everyone receives UBI? Your simple world view lacks incentives, and therefore is unreal
@Rainmaker1973 Probably side effects from c19 jabs. I highly recommend reading the post vaccine treatment guide on the IMA website; https://t.co/Yjzu1H5SiK
Elon, the dose issue is larger than Covid vaccine. We've gone from 3 injections in 1986 by first birthday to 29 injections, and during same period from under 10% to over 40% of children having a chronic health issue, most related to immune system dysregulation. Infants, unlike adults getting Covid vaccine, can't speak. But the studies comparing children w/ no vaccines to children receiving one or more reflect that the vaccinated have multiple times the rate of these conditions.
Full citations and support in Chapter 11 of Vaccines, Amen.
@SammmmBB_ No, stop conflating your lack of understanding with others. Just because you haven't spent the last 5 years studying and learning about this novel technology doesn't mean that everyone else is as ignorant and stupid as you are. You haven't asked a single fucking question in 5 yrs