Quand on a créé les communautés de communes on a même pas été foutu de réellement réduire la voilure voire de supprimer les mairies.
Là je doute qu'il se passe quelque chose.
Le pays devrait forcer les communes de petites tailles non enclavées à fusionner.
En IDF je ne vois pas l'intérêt, tout ce qui est arrivé l'intérieur de la N104 est déjà gros
@sjowall69@placepublique_@moniaceleste C'est quoi place publique ? Un machin qui cherche du sensationnalisme pour avoir une subvention écologique ?
Ah non, c'est le parti du gars qui couche avec la présentatrice de France 2 mdr
🟡Pitch: Recallée à ParcourSup, Rose doit quitter Paris pour le seul établissement qui l’accepte : le pensionnat coranique de Roubaix. Entre choc des cultures et quête de rédemption, Rose va tester les limites du vivre ensemble...et eux aussi !
TOMBÉE DU CIEL sortie le 8 juillet
@FrDesouche C'est pratique les morts:
-Personne ne va huer Manu
-S'il dit une connerie devant le cercueil le concerné ne pourra pas corriger/amender
C'est un peu ses bains de foule à lui en fin de règne
Ils vont t'expliquer que le bateau qui va rester là 3 semaines va faire chier les cétacés à 200km à la ronde, qu'on doit vivre dans la décroissance, que le câble émet des ondes qui vont transformer les homards en godzilla... Tout ça avec 308 recours.
Puis le lendemain ils seront dans leur Transavia Bordeaux - Palma pour un petit week-end de 3j bas carbone
Saadé ne finance pas BFM TV pour faire de l’oseille, mais pour s’en servir comme monnaie d’échange vis-à-vis des services que lui rend Macron pour sa compagnie de fret maritime.
Si la chaîne soutient les racailles contre la police, c’est parce que cette ligne est réclamée par le gouvernement. C’est une immense trahison vis-à-vis des policiers et des victimes.
R86S-G
BKHD N150/N305
BKHD L series (N100/N150/N355)
Des ports 10G 82599ES (plutôt que les mellanox connectX-3 qui consomment plus, et support vpp dpdk sur ce 10g Intel) et 2.5G Intel i226-V (simple driver eBPF)
Ça consomme un peu plus, mais t'as un vrai router flexible
Support de SRIOV, hardware offload,
So-called age verification for social media is spreading across the world, framed as an effort to create a safer internet for children. In reality, age verification lays the foundation for a fully controlled internet.
The age verification rush must be slowed down, and politicians need to recognize the consequences of different types of legislation and systems.
Age verification is the wrong approach to fix “the social media problem”
The big tech social media companies are bad. Their business model is bad; it is based on mass surveillance and manipulation, and they cooperate with governments in mapping entire populations. But age verification is fundamentally the wrong approach to preventing children from using big tech social media platforms. Introducing age verification is based on coercion; the state forces social media companies to verify their users’ identities. But the big tech social media platforms already know which of their users are children. Their business model depends on knowing this. They know how old users are, and they know exactly what type of person they are. As age verification is based on coercion, politicians could instead force platforms to stop doing the things politicians consider harmful to children, or force them to block children (again, they know who they are) from using their services. But instead, politicians seek to massively invade everyone’s privacy and undermine democratic rights on a global scale. In other words, the latter is the real objective – they do not want to protect children; they want to impose control.
Slippery slope of age verification
It is undeniable that age verification threatens freedom of expression, risks increasing mass surveillance, and is likely to lead to censorship. It will not only shrink the online world and reduce young people’s right to privacy (for example, if VPN services were to be restricted); but also risks becoming a significant step toward a controlled internet for everyone.
Most age verification is identity verification
Most countries are now considering introducing age verification systems, meaning that everyone would have to identify themselves either to the service/website they want to use or to a third party capable of linking them to their activity on that service or website. This is not age verification but identity verification, and the consequence is therefore that freedom of information is restricted (you can no longer visit regulated websites anonymously) and that you can no longer post anonymously on social media. This is a major problem in countries like the UK and Germany where the police conduct raids on people’s homes for posting content on social media that the authorities dislike. Or in the United States, where authorities are trying to pressure tech companies into revealing the identities behind accounts protesting ICE. Social media identity verification removes important tools for activists in countries where criticizing those in power is dangerous.
Restrictions on app store or operating system level
Some countries are looking to impose identity verification at the app store level or even within the operating system itself. This is an exciting experiment, since this is possible to circumvent using open-source operating systems. Some countries are already looking to include open-source systems. Since open-source systems cannot be controlled, politicians would ultimately need to ban devices that are not controlled by the state. The end point: telescreens like those in Orwell’s 1984, devices that both monitor you and broadcast only the information approved by the state.
The Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) alternative and the EU
The EU has presented its own age verification app as “completely anonymous”. The idea is to use Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) cryptography to break the link between the age credential issuer (EU governments) and the regulated services/sites. Currently, the EU app does not have ZKP functionality, contrasting Ursula von der Leyen’s claim that the app ”is technically ready to be used”. But more importantly, the app is currently designed to always function without ZKP technology; if ZKP is unavailable, the app falls back to a non-ZKP model. Even if fully developed ZKP technology could be implemented in the future, it would remain an optional extra feature that countries may choose to disable and that the EU could remove at any time.
Read more on our site.
https://t.co/wTVKHMS1zg