While every other group is encouraged to celebrate its heritage and advocate for its collective interests, the White man alone is branded a genocidal bigot for simply desiring the preservation of his own people.
This is a deliberate psychological weapon designed to pathologize natural in-group preference, effectively disarming the historic population of the West and ensuring they remain the only group without a moral mandate to secure their own future.
Posts like this one below from Joel justify and even give a moral mandate to the people who would Charlie Kirk us. This accusation says more about Joel’s own heart than it does about us. It’s all projection, all the way down. A weak, cowardly, and deeply insecure man painting a target on stronger men’s backs.
This chick used to have a website she built that mapped all the NGO networks, and she took it down after people started pointing out the common kosher denominator
Something weird is going on here.
The boomertard right is having an extremely disproportionate reaction to a smallish march by a group that doesn't do anything except be fit and clean-cut, carry flags around, and not burn stuff down.
Why?
It's not because they actually believe they're "FuNdEd By ThE sPLc!!1!" or that "ThEy'Re FeDs!!1!" If they really believed this, they'd just dismiss them like they do everything else they say this about.
No, there's something deeper going on here. Why would Data Republican be so up in arms about Patriot Front when she doesn't really have this extensive of an immune reaction to left-wing groups?
“But what happens if the sovereign who decides on the exception is evil or incompetent?”
That’s literally what almost every Western nation currently has right now.
Schmitt’s entire point when he penned those words nearly a century ago wasn’t that sovereigns are always virtuous or wise.
He’s arguing that a sovereign always exists, even within liberal political systems that claim to have abolished sovereignty altogether in favor of some fantasy illusion that democracy means “the people” are now in charge.
The people are never in charge because the people never have the power to declare a state of exception. They never have the power to suspend the normal rule of law. They only have the power to operate within the law, and in the case of a democratic system, elect some (but rarely all) of the political leaders who possess some (but rarely all) of the powers of a sovereign.
But the second an election is over, the power the people wield over the politician is finished. The political leaders are the only ones who get to introduce or vote on legislation, and only some of the political leaders get to veto legislation or interpret it. And even fewer get to enforce it.
And sometimes, none of the political leaders at all possess the powers of a sovereign because their predecessors outsourced all such powers to supposedly “apolitical” entities that are completely independent of the democratic process and entirely unaccountable by the voting public even more than the elected politicians are.
Does the President or Congress have the power to issue emergency rate cuts or hikes on the Fed Fund Rate? Can they inject liquidity into the market when a crisis hits? Can they force Federal agencies to stop promoting ideologies that the voting public contests? Can they withhold payments when they see clear evidence of fraud taking downstream of the Federal welfare system? Can they snap their fingers and compel the automatic deportation of all illegals from the country?
They can’t even get Kilmar Garcia out of the US after 16 months of litigation, despite the fact that no one contests that he’s in this country illegally.
Ultimately, what Schmitt was trying to get at is that somewhere within all political systems, sovereign power always exists. The trick Liberalism plays is trying to conceal this fact. But if you just look around, you can see sovereignty being invoked all the time.
It’s just that we live in an age where it’s constantly being invoked for Progressivism, even as Progressivism itself constantly lie about where real power actually lies and what master that power serves.
This is the kind of behavior that gets you people pogrommed.
"Hey could you stop doing that?"
"No. I HAVE to dox them."
"Look we're asking nicely can you just stop."
"You don't understand. I HAVE to dox them. It's in my blood."
@ecomfyrina@WardElliottii@lesliedouglasx@LeftyCrypto What he meant by saying it is not a nation at all is that a nation is its people, and if an American is literally anyone from anywhere, then it is a meaningless term.