Jim Nargent

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@BullyCreative @matthewstoller Right on! Racial segregation is good so long as we term it “affinity groups.” Nothing weird about a bunch of white men united by race and self-flagellation.

MLK’s dream was not that skin color become irrelevant, but the essential means by which we separate ourselves. Progress!

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@jmeesvliz @Tcell_bodyshot @clairlemon @mboudry “Purposes for which it was not designed” - you’re talking about a survey, and the thing you claim it wasn’t designed for is a specific reasonable interpretation of its data.

This is such an incredibly dumb and Orwellian statement. You are truly pathetic.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@jmeesvliz @Tcell_bodyshot @clairlemon @mboudry You moved the goal post from “what he did was unethical” to “I don’t believe him”.

Like VRT, you decided on a conclusion beforehand, and will twist the facts to support it.

Like VRT, you are politically biased, uninterested in truth, and manipulating people by distorting it.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@wartsandbrawls Funny, I read that as “unemployable skills”, which would refer to the fields you are in fact reflexively defending, and I thought it made perfect sense.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@badinfinity2 @jonathanbfine Let me guess, you’re a humanities professor. You exude all the stereotypes.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@Daniel_Propson Ok, I'll play your game of pedantic smartassery. An always available personal tutor that's smarter than a phd, can design a personal curriculum, can create diagrams, and educational videos, is going to be more revolutionary than books.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@emollick I feel like the bigger story here is that academics are cowed into public silence. The culture in higher education is extraordinarily political and intolerant, marked by shaming and cancellation.

Positivity for the most revolutionary educational technology in history is verboten

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@emollick @GaryMarcus Radio silence from Gary. That really defines the difference between an actual scholar and a psuedo-intellectual grifter. But maybe there's a good reason he didn't cite any of the 10 highly legitimate studies he mentioned.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@CybertruckBurns @Smithjohn3966 @BenMullin You could start by looking at your own feed

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@GaryMarcus @emollick The MIT "study" that failed every measure of scientific rigor? I'm sure you know you're full of shit.

You are a grifter posing as an intellectual. You are not the slightest bit interested in objectivity. Your only talent is feeding your audience of anti-AI morons what they want.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@kdavids87 @AlexThomp @brikeilarcnn So now this story about what led to putting Donald in the WH is irrelevant? You fake, cowardly piece of shit. You can’t even own your own argument. As if you weren’t crying “whatabout Trump” during the 2024 campaign constantly.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@kdavids87 @AlexThomp @brikeilarcnn Put your fingers in your ears and cry “whatabout Trump” until hell freezes over. Never confront your own failings.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@jbarro The anti-semitism simmering beneath these questions is far more troubling than their relevance to a mayoral campaign.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@BiologicalNN @mattyglesias Yes, that makes perfect sense. Anyone acting with good intentions is taking us down the road to hell - we needn't examine their actions.

Your reply here - well-intentioned and dangerous for it. Though you mean well, you would take us straight to the gulags.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@terry_033 @mattyglesias Perhaps the problem is you don't know what words mean.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@MuhdiMajde @Variety This is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever read on this site.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@PixelCNinja @topapate When was the last time you posted something not written by AI?

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@aflicker @nyttypos @mattyglesias @NateSilver538 Dude reads NYT religiously every day. Nate Silver holds political views out of step with leftist orthodoxy. On some issues, one might say he is even a little bit... <whispers> 'centrist'.

Ergo, he he must be denigrated and dismissed, regardless of his so-called "credentials".

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@iwearahoodie @mlk43 @AustralianJA I guess “colonizing zionists” is the new substitute for “dirty Jews” among leftist anti-semites.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@Tyler_A_Harper @AaronRegunberg More of your self-serving prattle against AI - a technology you know so little about and which will likely do more for the good of humanity, especially in education, than any in history, but which you selfishly condemn out of personal job security fears.

[Jim Nargent @JNargent]

@urizenfaded @mattyglesias And then there are people like you - the anti-Semites. Someone could ask you the weather and your response would include “Israel”. You offer nothing. You are political poison.