JP Reilly 🇵🇸

Writer, wanderer, poker player.

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@matfrankland1 @dklappin Dario said in the post that the decks had been "shuffled" by the machine, so they weren't "fresh unshuffled decks". More likely the shuffler was set to sort the decks into the default order instead of shuffle them, and the dealer happened to do the same cut twice. A perfect storm

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@FIVECARD_ @dklappin It's not the number of players that dictates the flop, but the location at which the dealer cuts the (sorted) deck. The cards will always be consecutive, but will sometimes move into the adjacent suit, for example 2♥️A♥️K♦️ or A♠️K♥️Q♥️.

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@FIVECARD_ @dklappin Good post but unclear what you mean with:

"Why 7 and not 8 or 9: with 8 or 9 players off a sorted deck, the board comes out as three-plus running cards of a single suit (like 7♥ 8♥ 9♥...)"

as that is what happened, and can happen regardless of number of players.

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@Luscious_Lon Damn then it's somewhat likely you actually played the same hand three times in a row. Any recollection of what happened when you played the second hand in this sequence? Was your hand one of the ones detailed below?

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@BetOnDrew Good lord don't encourage them

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@jsmith84poker The first card off was a 6, otherwise the big blind cannot have J5 offsuit (his hand would have been suited instead):

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@ClubWPTGold There is a completely rational explanation:

https://t.co/lQ5xKRuX3J

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@dklappin Shuffler was clearly set to "sort" (put cards in order of rank and suits) and not shuffle. Probably a ~10 to 1 shot that the dealer does the same cut both times.

The clear giveway is the flop and runout - 432 of same suit, burn ace, king on turn, burn queen, jack on river:

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@Chris_D_Brewer https://t.co/lQ5xKRuX3J

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@dklappin Shuffler was clearly set to "sort" (put cards in order of rank and suits) and not shuffle. Probably a ~10 to 1 shot that the dealer does the same cut both times.

The clear giveway is the flop and runout - 432 of same suit, burn ace, king on turn, burn queen, jack on river:

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@dklappin @matfrankland1 Close but no cigar, as the first card dealt has to have been a 6. Much more likely to have been the shuffler set to "sort" instead of "shuffle", with same dealer cut both times.

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@RealKidPoker @phil_hellmuth 😂😂😂 👏

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@ThePokerKaren 😂😂

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@baloneyburner @dklappin The dealer cut the deck after the shuffle, and they must have been playing 7-handed. In that case the BB can get the 5 on the first card, and an offsuit J on the second card.

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@DOUGINTUCSON @dklappin They didn't, as far as I know. BB had J5o both hands.

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@dklappin We can also infer that they were 7-handed and the deck was cut to a 6:

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@dklappin Shuffler was clearly set to "sort" (put cards in order of rank and suits) and not shuffle. Probably a ~10 to 1 shot that the dealer does the same cut both times.

The clear giveway is the flop and runout - 432 of same suit, burn ace, king on turn, burn queen, jack on river:

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@Luscious_Lon Can you please clarify how many players were in the hand? The case for the shuffler being set to "sort" instead of "shuffle" only makes sense if you were seven handed, otherwise the hands don't match up to what Dario described.

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@hfrendal @Andy_Bloch @dklappin Apparently they have a "sort" mode for putting the deck in order.

[JP Reilly 🇵🇸 @JPReilly15]

@GrizzMMA You forgot the best part

https://t.co/mCNwPY58gC

[Deepcosmoss @Deepcosmoss]

Kuantum fiziğindeki en büyük baş ağrısı gözlemci etkisidir bir elektrona bakmadığın sürece o bir olasılık dalgasıdır ama ona baktığın an tek bir noktada belirir yani evren sadece sen ona baktığında render edilir tıpkı şu an oynanan açık dünya oyunlarındaki gibi işlemci gücünden tasarruf etmek için sadece oyuncunun baktığı yön çizilir arkanı döndüğünde orası bir matematiksel potansiyele dönüşür

Şimdi şunu düşün evren neden işlemci tasarrufu yapsın ki eğer her şey rastgele bir patlamanın sonucuysa neden fizik yasaları devasa bir bilgisayarın kaynak yönetimi gibi davranıyor simülasyon teorisi eskiden felsefe bölümlerinin eğlencesiydi ama şimdi teorik fizikçiler evrenin temel yapıtaşlarının madde değil bilgi olduğunu tartışıyor her şey bir bit ve o bitler çok katı kurallara bağlı

Çoğu insan bir mimar fikrini duyunca bizi izleyen bizi test eden birini hayal ediyor ama konuşulan senaryo bu değil mimar var ama bizimle hiç ilgilenmiyor o sadece kusursuz bir fizik motoru yazdı kütleçekimini termodinamiği ve kuantum potansiyelini kodladı sistemi başlattı ve kendi işine döndü

Kısım şu hepimiz o kodun içinde hayatta kalmaya çalışan ve kendi kendine bilinç geliştiren bir anomaliyiz dokunma diye bir şey yok sadece elektromanyetik itim var gerçeklik diye bir şey yok sadece beyninin işlediği veri var ve o mimar muhtemelen bizim varlığımızdan bile haberdar değil biz sadece muazzam bir simülasyonun içindeki çok ilginç bir yan etkisiyiz