@Seajay23@irgarner It's already widely practiced in many ways even in America. I get the sense that you're referring to a very specific set of eugenicist policy goals as eugenics - it's broader than that.
Abortion in America as it stands, for instance, is quite clearly a eugenic enterprise.
@GideonTravail@Hntaigana@irgarner That's precisely the sort of dictionary retconning that the far-left has used to separate "sex"/"gender", redefine "racism" in order to exclude racism towards whites, etc.
Selective breeding is eugenics, conscious sexual selection is eugenics. Everybody's a eugenicist.
@Seajay23@irgarner "There are ~zero pro-eugenics people."
This is an odd thing to say if you know you're wrong Chris, but in case you don't - you're wrong.
Some other repliers have already said it: *MOST* people are pro-eugenics. I certainly am. Almost everybody I talk to about too. Not "~zero".
Lots of talk about "Ox Alpha" on here, so I figure I should contribute some results I found.
On a (fairly tough) private benchmark (i.e. with zero chance of contamination in any model), with minimal/low reasoning, it underperforms quite a lot, even with a reasoning advantage: