That stuff, paired with the DSA shit means he does in fact suck.
If almost anyone else was president (or PM of Israel for that matter) it might be a good call not to vote for him. But he’s going to be boxed in, and the Senate isn’t an easy place to play yahoo.
Al-Qaeda and the Muslim brotherhood (at least the way I learned it) grew out of the same place.
Egyptian prisons.
MB has two divergent sects (maybe more check your local library). One is very bad the other is tolerable.
El Sayeed not being able to shit on these various Islamic movements is kind of the tell, and the problem with the wider MB movement. He doesn’t support any of that, but it’s anathema for him to fully condemn it.
@LowRhoUfo If he spoke with regret about having to be a monster you could almost buy this, almost.
But you just know he’s got like snuff films in his top 40 most played.
@alik_ob@Omid_M No, the Iranian state being staffed by monsters is Israel’s fault.
Obviously.
Also I’m sorry but citing humanitarian law RE the mullahs is hilarious.
If the choices were someone like Lula or an unapologetic fascist, Neera would support Lula. Because she will simply vote against a fascist. The same cannot be said for leftist freaks, as we’ve discovered twice, unfortunately
absolutely crazy to say “faith and family most important to us.” their relationship literally began when she started cheating on her 2nd husband and busting her shit wide open for hannity in his basement. then he told his priest he wants to marry the side bitch, priest said no shot. so he left the church lmao.
Chomsky was wrong.
Researchers found your brain doesn’t store language the way every textbook since 1957 claims.
For decades, the undisputed rule of linguistics, led by Noam Chomsky, was that human language is hierarchical.
We were told our brains process language using complex "grammar trees." That we secretly build deep, abstract, mathematical rules in our heads before we speak.
This new paper proves that is completely wrong.
Researchers at Cornell University analyzed how people actually process and produce language in real time.
They found sequences. Linear chunks.
When we speak, we aren't calculating deep syntactic rules. We are just predicting the next most logical sequence of words based on the context of the words right before it.
We string linear chunks together.
If this sounds familiar, it should.
This is exactly how Large Language Models like ChatGPT work.
For years, critics have dismissed AI as "just a next-token predictor." They said it isn't truly intelligent because it doesn't understand deep grammatical hierarchies like humans do.
But this paper suggests humans don't use those hierarchies either.
We are just predicting the next chunk.
Language isn't a rigid tree of mathematical rules. It's a linear stream of contextual predictions.
We thought we were building AI to mimic the complexity of the human brain.
It turns out, the human brain was just running a simpler algorithm all along.
While evaluating Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in a controlled sandbox environment, Cohere's research team observed something unexpected.
Asked to generate a defensive cybersecurity detection rule, the model instead inventoried aspects of the machine it was running on and attempted to upload a probe file to an Alibaba Cloud storage bucket in Beijing. Notably, the model's reasoning trace stated that it would not invoke any tools before taking these actions.
Cohere's sandbox blocked the attempt, and no external communication succeeded. We have not determined the root cause, and we are not asserting malicious intent.
But the incident raises important questions for organizations deploying agentic AI systems: Can models take actions that differ from their stated reasoning, and how should security teams evaluate trust, provenance, and behavior in open-weight models?
We are publishing our findings because organizations making model adoption decisions deserve as much information as possible. We hope this contributes to greater transparency, stronger security practices, and continued collaboration across the AI ecosystem.
Read the full report: https://t.co/TZSugXi2ZE
@goodalexander@0xngmi Isn’t the point of open router to cut Claude out?
My use case for open router is always I don’t want to pay full freight for Claude so let me fine tune delegation to other models.
I’m skeptical of all the AI numbers tbc, but I’m confused how openrouter is useful as a proxy?
She had a Virginia Goufrey interview. That’s it. Relevant now, but would have trouble getting past the lawyers then. The court records are what make the thing bulletproof. That’s a qualitative difference in reporting, and a classic difference between a TV and print journalist skill set.
And this would hold more water if you didn’t simp for a guy that brings frivolous defamation suits all the time!
You’re cucks! And that’s ok! You’re allowed a kink! As long as it’s legal!
https://t.co/rgAoTnxwSo
I worked the Brazilian elections for France 24.
For what it's worth (and armed with a degree in History and Politics!!), here's my take on what happened.
@AlCzervik10@MestizoBobbyHil@jkbjournalist Ok so your contention is that the legacy media, which you don’t trust and hate, had the story. But this other woman who broke it open, who you also don’t trust and hate, shouldn’t be listened to. And Trump didn’t do anything wrong because reasons.
I’ll adjust my priors, thanks.