JSquared

I believe Lucy Letby is innocent.

[Richard Short @EHOinExile]

An incredible turnout for @bluecollartory_ led by the unstoppable @ClarkVasey
On the side of those who earn their own way and support our great nation with solid British values.
Trust is earned and Blue Collar Conservatism is earning that trust.
#BlueCollar #ToryWorkers

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@James_Treadwell Please clarify. As yet no one has produced the ‘smoking gun’ and until they do it is fair to ask questions about the investigation, trial and evidence.

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@DebbieKennett @MartynPitman @mellycatslave @doctorcaldwell @benshep20 @merchant47 @simon170528 @gmcuk @CPMorris1234 That’s pretty much how I saw it. Goss also couldn’t get his head round the shift chart and allowed in as evidence even though it was clearly full of bias, so it wasn’t just the medicine he didn’t understand, he was clueless throughout.

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@WanjiruNjoya @JillCollier16 Nope, the dog’s name wasn’t Trigger, that’s just the woke bunch trying to rewrite history. Back during WW2 the dog’s actual name wasn’t a derogatory term in the way it is today.

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@eternalhopeoaks What about the double Muzio, I played against that with the black pieces once in a correspondence game and it was quite a harrowing experience.

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@eternalhopeoaks Latvian Gambit maybe?

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@DebbieKennett It’s about time some of these other healthcare cases got more publicity. I’m hoping the #letby case will help shine a light on them.

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@gill1109 @PatriciaWilts15 @MarinaPurkiss @theJeremyVine @JeremyVineOn5 Please let us know if they invite you on the show, things are getting interesting right now. We’ve just had the rather worthless Thirlwall report and everyone seems to be waiting on the CCRC. The whole system needs a shake up.

[Jeremy Vine & Daytime on 5 @JeremyVineOn5]

"I would like the Criminal Cases Review Commission to get a bloody move on."

@Jeremy_Hunt says there is mounting evidence that Lucy Letby's conviction could be "unsafe" and that hospitals too often misattribute systemic failings.

@nelufar | @theJeremyVine | #JeremyVine

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@ezmehn3y Not really. We know Cheshire Police rejigged the list of suspicious murders to fit their narrative, that’s why the list was so full of bias.

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@skdh When we did that I went to my sister-in-law and asked if we could borrow one of her kids to shove through the small window that was open. Sure she said, take whichever one you want. The nephew didn't want to know but the niece did it and it only cost us £10 to bribe her!

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@DebbieKennett @Mia87562570 Thanks Debbie. I hadn't realised it was possible for the CCRC to do that, but looking at their website it appears they can go further than just the submissions by the legal teams and can carry out their own investigation and with quite wide ranging powers.
https://t.co/YXX2uS01cQ

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@Mia87562570 @DebbieKennett I agree. It’s difficult to see how Thirlwall could release a report or make a statement knowing that the CCRC could subsequently make a decision that then undermines that. It does, however, put a bit of pressure on the CCRC to come to a decision.

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@Poppy_yyyyyyyy HMRC could take a few lessons from them!

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@frederi21962339 @mervynpervyn She never confessed

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@frederi21962339 @letbymoj Really, when was that?

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@PeterElston1 I would hope that someone who is a doctor wouldn’t consciously scapegoat a co-worker to the point where that person was charged and convicted, but genuinely believed harm was being deliberately done. It’s easy to see patterns that aren’t really there.

[David Davis MP @DavidDavisMP]

The lax treatment of Angela Rayner by HMRC has brought into focus how arbitrary the tax authority can be in its treatment of ordinary citizens.

Too often, HMRC has pursued individuals and small businesses for vast sums of money in error. HMRC are masters of using process as punishment, making themselves increasingly difficult to contact while torturing people with demand letters and bankruptcy notices.

Victims of these errors are often forced to spend huge amounts of time and money to prove HMRC wrong. This sometimes runs to hundreds of thousands of pounds in legal fees, many times the actual amount in dispute. They also find their names and details published in a list of deliberate tax defaulters, in effect a "name and shame" list.

I have to question whether this meets citizens' privacy rights, since these do not appear to be court rulings but HMRC opinions.

HMRC's excesses must be brought under control. It is time ministers took a grip of this.

https://t.co/cJIQYyUE0e

[JSquared @JSquared_64]

@HarryZiman @rosiew5 @gill1109 This is pretty much my understanding and it highlights a flaw in the system whereby evidence can be misinterpreted by an “expert”, the jury relies on that and a conviction results. We’ve seen this so many times in other cases and we still haven’t learnt from it.