@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi "Murder of an innocent woman which you were more than likely involved in"
So, how else do you read that sentence? I'm curious.
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi Amanda Knox was cleared of murder. This is an objective fact. Deb is inferring she is still guilty without ANY evidence.
But you lap it up because Deb says? Why do you believe Deb? What is it about her exactly?
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi The only times I ever spoke to her, I don't really think she came across as particularly warm.
What is Deb's appeal, in your opinion?
@AndyRobi@SaraLockwood_x If Deb was qualified in any way, she'd know there was such a thing as "inference" in publishing/media.
Deb has inferred Knox is "somehow involved" in murder.
She is accusing indirectly, but it's the same thing.
This is typical of Deb's writings, poisonous and amateurish.
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi Translation, she is stubbornly clinging to the narrative spun by the prosecution at trial and refusing to listen to counter evidence that completely destroys it.
That's why she's so nasty. She can't challenge Dr Shoo Lee's evidence, because she's not a medic. So she attacks him.
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi Translation, she is stubbornly clinging to the narrative spun by the prosecution at trial and refusing to listen to counter evidence that completely destroys it.
That's why she's so nasty. She can't challenge Dr Shoo Lee's evidence, because she's not a medic. So she attacks him.
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi Yes it does. She's accused journalists of being "grifters". But people in the media are public facing.
And you know? She voluntarily inserted herself into debate. She deserves the same scrutiny she gives to other people.
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi But she's accused Amanda Knox of being involved in murder, despite her being exonerated, and accused Dr Shoo Lee of "fraud".
I'd hate to hear what she says about these people when she's TRYING to be defamatory...
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi And actually, posting things on Twitter is publishing. You can be sued for defamation, you can even commit contempt of court.
Luckily, for Deb, she's only got 700 odd followers. If she had more, good chance she could be sued for her outrageous defamatory comments.
@NeilWilbyMedia@hairyairey Can anyone confirm this? I have my suspicions as he seems slightly clueless about the nuances of law.
Then again, this could be the smoking gun that PROVES he is a police officer...
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi You could argue it's in the public interest? She pays a lot of money to get people to read her stuff, technically she's in the public space. Why should she get free reign to spread poison on the Internet about people completely unchallenged? She can give it, can't take it.
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi But she's not qualified, is she? She has no medical, legal or mathematics degree. I have no idea what she does for certain. I've just heard she's an admin assistant. I can believe it though. She gets very cagey when you ask her what her qualifications and job are.
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi I mean, do you not think Deb is slightly arrogant? Middle-aged housewife, works as an admin assistant, writing "articles" accusing neonatology professors of "fraud" in order convince credulous people such as yourself that a comprehensive medical team is writing "fairy stories"?
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi Also, in terms of Deb's writing, I get a palpable sense that she's quite an angry person. I'd say her writings might even boarder on hate speech. She doesn't write objectively, she writes in a way that editorialises and tries to influence the reader. It's propaganda.
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi I'm afraid she does use chat gpt. And the thing is, she's just an admin assistant but writes as though she's more qualified than Dr Shoo Lee.
Why should anyone listen to her seriously?
@SaraLockwood_x@AndyRobi But it's kinda weird. Deb pays lots of money for her X account to write about Lucy Letby. Didn't she expect that maybe people might challenge her? And I guess, if Deb fibs about going to court, what else might she be fibbing about?