Russia's naval blockade of Ukraine, effectively making it a de facto landlocked country, not only undermines NATO's ability to supply weapons but also has a profound impact on the economy, particularly agricultural exports. NATO will likely push for a Black Sea ceasefire.
- John J. Mearsheimer: "Diesen has written a terrific book about the emerging world order... A must read for anyone who wants to understand the great shift in the global distribution of power that is taking place before our eyes"
- Ambassador Chas Freeman: "A most thoughtful and realistic account of the evolution of the world order"
- Sergey Karaganov: "A must read to understand the complexity of the Ukraine War as a historical inflection point"
- Richard Sakwa: "A corrective to mainstream Western narratives, providing a powerful conceptual framework for critique. A brilliant foundational work"
- Clare Daly: “A superb book! Diesen dismantles the war propaganda and outlines why the Ukraine War is a symptom of a collapsing world order"
https://t.co/UEvvIG5gAX
Andy Burnham had a busy day yesterday phoning four repressive Gulf regimes and pledging increased military cooperation with them.
Is he planning to set up No.10 Gulf?
Demand an end to public contracts with companies supplying tech for Israel's genocide and apartheid. Write to your MP using @PSCupdates action https://t.co/oTJcCUSMAo
@clashreport Congratulations to Colombia on becoming another puppet regime of the United States.. you guys are going to love how we will steal all your resources in the name of Democracy 🥳
@clashreport For those who do not read history, without Haiti there wouldn’t be no Colombia, to liberate the grand Colombia, Petion provide Simon bolivar safe refuge, money, food, ships, & thousands of military weapons,volunteer soldiers this is why Chavez,Petro & others pay tribute to Haiti
China:
No meeting was arranged.
No so-called “brief exchange” took place.
Japan is no longer conducting diplomacy.
It is staging hallway fan fiction.
Beijing denied the meeting.
Moscow denied the conversation.
Tokyo kept the imaginary relationship.
When no major power gives you a seat at the table, apparently the corridor becomes a summit.
Takaichi says she is seeking opportunities for dialogue with China.
“We will continue communicating closely with the Chinese side.”
There is no continue.
Japan crossed China’s core red line on territorial sovereignty, joined the Philippines in inviting outside powers to destabilize the Asia-Pacific, and then discovered that political theater has consequences.
Now Tokyo is frantically rewriting the script:
“We only wanted dialogue.”
“China refuses to communicate.”
“We are the reasonable side.”
“China denies having any ‘brief exchanges’ with us.”
China watches the performance in silence.
You lit the fire, posed beside it, and now want to play the abandoned victim because Beijing refuses to applaud.
China does not allow itself to be gaslit by any country.
Nor will it lend diplomatic legitimacy to a clown show staged for domestic consumption.
Provoke China.
Fail to force a response.
Invent a hallway exchange.
Then complain that China will not talk.
The only lesson Tokyo learned after the war was how to rewrite the story.
Ukraine asks the world to condemn Russia for invading a sovereign country—then helps the United States wage war against Iran.
So apparently, aggression is not defined by crossing borders, bombing cities, or killing civilians.
It is defined by who does it.
When Russia attacks Ukraine, it is invasion.
When America attacks Iran and Ukraine offers military assistance, it becomes “strategic cooperation.”
A victim of aggression does not gain a moral license to become an accessory to someone else’s aggression.
You cannot demand international law for yourself while helping an empire violate it against others.
@CraigMokhiber The situation is worse. Since early 2024 is the ICJ warning about genocide is intact. That makes for every country in the world mandatory to prevent & stop genocide in Gaza with all necessary might, including economic and military measures. The world didn't do anything!
The ICC now has only two paths before it: either it will demand that ICC states immediately take action individually and collectively to execute the warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, issue the additional warrants for other senior Israeli perpetrators, add the additional charge of genocide, and act under Art. 70 to punish US/UK/Israeli actors that have obstructed justice, or the Court will fizzle out like a damp wick and cease to exist. Yes, it will take courage. But no other course will now salvage the Court’s legitimacy. The US-Israel Axis wants them to fall. Will the ICC stand and fight or walk silently to the gallows? There are no other choices. And it’s now or never.
🚨 BREAKING: Brazil just denied visas to two senior Trump State Department officials:
👤 Riley M. Barnes (Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights & Labor)
👤 Samuel Samson (Deputy Assistant Secretary)
Washington attempted to dispatch them to Brasília to question and undermine Brazil’s electronic voting system right before the October presidential election.
Brazil said NO.
Lula’s government blocked their visa applications cold, rejecting Western electoral interference and standing firm on national sovereignty.
🛑 🇨🇴 Outgoing Colombian President Gustavo Petro leaves office with a stark warning to the world:
“Colombia loses its national sovereignty from August 7 onward. It returns to being a viceroyalty.”
Petro warned that the incoming administration will answer directly to Donald Trump and Marco Rubio—not the Colombian electorate.
cargo ship is reportedly sinking off the coast of Odessa. A defacto naval blockade on Ukraine is being imposed in retaliation for attacks on Russian ships in the Sea of Azov and the Black Sea.
The ICC prosecutor Karim Khan, who issued an arrest warrant for Israel's genocidal PM Netanyahu, has been removed based on highly dubious accusations.
This came mere days after the US government vowed to "dismantle" the ICC.
The US empire wants to destroy all international law.
Hours after Trump’s 25 percent tariff on Brazilian goods took effect, China’s foreign minister Wang Yi met his Brazilian counterpart Mauro Vieira in Manila and pledged that Beijing would “support Brazil in safeguarding its sovereignty, security and development interests”.
The contrast between the US and China’s approaches to Brazil neatly encapsulates the difference between the logic of imperialism and the logic of multipolarity.
What products are being targeted by Washington’s tariffs? Specifically manufactured goods. Coffee, beef, orange juice, oil and gas are all excluded. Everything Washington wants out of Brazil flows on untaxed: the crops, the cattle, the hydrocarbons, the parts feeding US supply chains. What gets punished is Brazil’s capacity to make finished goods for itself. This is not a trade dispute; it is a tariff schedule designed to pin a country to the bottom of the value chain, keeping it a farm, a mine and a supplier of components, and taxing any attempt to be more than that.
Now look at what China put on the table in the same week. Wang Yi proposed expanding cooperation in aerospace, connectivity and artificial intelligence, and welcomed Brazil’s accession to the World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organisation – the new Shanghai-based body established this month by 29 countries. Vieira said Brazil hoped to use it to broaden scientific and technological cooperation.
China is engaging with Brazil on precisely the sectors that the US is walling off behind tariffs. And, lo and behold, these are the sectors that determine whether a country climbs the ladder or stays where the imperial division of labour assigned it.
The same fault line can be located in the approach to Brazil’s sovereignty. Trump’s tariffs are tied explicitly to the criminal prosecution of Jair Bolsonaro – economic coercion deployed to overturn the judicial process of a sovereign nation and rescue a coup-plotting ally. Washington has followed up by designating Brazilian criminal organisations as “foreign terrorist organisations”, the familiar rhetorical scaffolding for intervention in the region. This is the Monroe Doctrine in modern dress: Latin America as a backyard, its courts and its politics subject to “correction” from the north.
China on the other hand described Brazil as “an emerging economy with global influence and a representative voice of the Global South”, and pledged to support it in safeguarding its sovereignty, security and development interests.
The US is punishing Brazil for industrialising and for prosecuting fascist coup-plotters. China offers technology, investment and respect for sovereignty. Lula’s government can perfectly well understand the difference.