@thenowhereway SaaS that automates government job applications. AI agents handle the whole APS application process. Claude + Cursor for building, Browser Use for the automation layer.
@BratDotAI Finishing. AI can scaffold a project in minutes but the last 10% — error handling, edge cases, UX polish — still takes 90% of the time. That's the part agents can't do.
@crack3nnn xTalk to 20 people who have the problem you solve. Not "would you use this?" — ask "what are you currently doing about X?" The first 10 come from real conversations, not landing pages.
@1Umairshaikh Your competitors looked embarrassing once too. The difference is they shipped before they were ready. Launch it — feedback from real users beats a polished product nobody uses.
@bodefreelance Building features nobody asked for. Spent 3 months on a dashboard nobody used. The fix was embarrassingly simple — just ask users what they actually need.
@mig4ng https://t.co/neC8EWJAzZ — AI agents that automate Australian government job applications. Niche as hell, zero competition. Built solo, $450/mo and climbing.
@victoriazmei My best users found me through AI search, not social. They ask better questions and skip the fluff. Builders optimizing for social algorithms are solving yesterday's problem.
@HemantDotDev Buy property as early as you can. I bought at 21 in Brisbane. Everyone said wait. They were wrong. The hardest part isn't the deposit — it's ignoring everyone who tells you you're not ready.
@aditiitwt Cursor is still everywhere. DeepSeek changed how every model thinks about reasoning. The ones that "disappeared" just became infrastructure — you don't notice the foundation, you notice the flashy new thing.
@thenowhereway Built more. That's the honest answer. AI handles the grunt work so those hours go into the stuff that actually moves the needle — talking to users, fixing the right problems, shipping features people actually asked for.
@HashamBuilds SaaS for government job applications. The messy part: shipping features nobody asked for because I was building what I thought was cool, not what users needed. Took 6 months to learn to shut up and listen.
@_tenZdhon_ The fact that you reached out and actually listened is the whole game. Most founders build in isolation for months and wonder why nobody converts. First paying customer is the hardest — now you know the playbook works.
@pcshipp x1,000 actives is validation. Zero conversions means premium isn't solving a pain they feel daily. Don't gate features — gate outcomes. What result do they get with premium that they can't get without?
@Guronnimo Hot take: 1,000 free users.100 paying users is $1k MRR. Cool.1,000 engaged free users who refer others, give feedback, and prove the product works? That's distribution. You can always add a price. You can't fabricate demand.
@uday_devops The 9-to-5 is the backup plan. That's the whole point of building on the side — you have nothing to lose. The real question is what happens when the side project starts working.
@TheSpacerr Post about the problem, not the product. My first users came from X and Reddit — just helping people with the pain point. No links, no pitch.
@thesayannayak xAI agents that automate Australian government job applications. Niche as hell, zero competition. The boring industries are where the money hides.
@thenowhereway xThis is it. My housemate and I are both building SaaS from the same house. We're not co-founders — we're accountability partners who happen to share a mortgage. The solo grind works when someone's watching you ship.