Meta's Product Integration
Plus, AI generated ads will be good for their value-proposition
The limit set by media departments will allow unlimited A/B testing of copywriting and images/video
Meta is looking to use AI themselves in several ways:
1. Instagram pitched influencers on its AI chatbot that responds to fan comments and messages
https://t.co/bGkofTCvN0
2. AI features for advertisers to generate ad copy and background images. And a tool to fit their content for different aspect ratios required for various products, like the FB Newsfeed or Reels
🚨Instagram to replace influencer personalities with AI🚨
Instagram pitched influencers on its AI chatbot that responds to fan comments and messages
Influencers are hesitant, "What if it says something that gets me cancelled? I should get cancelled on my own terms"
0/6
Why is Meta open sourcing their models?
1. AI is not their core business
2. They're behind
Let's dig into their open source strategy in light of the newly released Llama 3 models
• 8 billion parameters
• 70 billion parameters
Open Source AI is Icing on the Cake
Any open source models are just icing for Meta an Apple
Meta already has the customer touch points needed to distribute any AI products
And any AI generated content will be consumed on their properties: Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp
Open source AI models will be run on Apple silicon—as long as they have the best consumer hardware
I'm mainly talking inference here. Leave training to the hyperscalers
Google's CEO tells his employees to stop bringing their politics to work and respect coworkers right to just do their job. Let's see if this causes the same media and Twitter meltdown it did when we asked the same. I doubt it! https://t.co/avAP3mqrFV
@finbarrtimbers GenAI—content production—is a complement to Meta's advertising properties
If another company controls it, they get margin on every prompt, not Meta
If Meta makes it free, they benefit from more content
@finbarrtimbers OpenAI makes the AI content more expensive because they charge to use their models
They need AI to make money. Meta doesn't
More expensive content --> more costly to share content --> less content --> etc
GenAI—content production—is a complement to Meta's advertising properties
If another company controls it, they get margin on every prompt, not Meta
If Meta makes it free, they benefit from more content
AI-made stuff will be shared on Meta, which is good for them. More content --> more eyeballs --> more ads --> more money
It behooves Meta to let as many people as possible create more content with it
If models are controlled by OpenAI/etc, the margin goes to them
OpenAI makes the AI content more expensive because they charge to use their models
They need AI to make money. Meta doesn't
More expensive content --> more costly to share content --> less content --> etc
🚨Instagram to replace influencer personalities with AI🚨
Instagram pitched influencers on its AI chatbot that responds to fan comments and messages
Influencers are hesitant, "What if it says something that gets me cancelled? I should get cancelled on my own terms"
0/6
🚨Instagram to replace influencer personalities with AI🚨
Instagram pitched influencers on its AI chatbot that responds to fan comments and messages
Influencers are hesitant, "What if it says something that gets me cancelled? I should get cancelled on my own terms"
0/6
Takeaways
• IMO AI's still not good enough to do this
• As it gets better it will create a new market
• Which makes it cheaper for small influencers to engage fans
• No matter what happens, Meta is still a big winner. AI content will be consumed on Meta properties
6/6