Olivia
Online
Jake Mueller
@JakeMue50897704
The Philosopher
USA
Joined May 2022
74 Following
117 Followers
3.4K Posts
@KendallSals @RealCandaceO It’s typical cult behavior to get the children so you can indoctrinate them as soon as possible.
@julie_dbay Read them and weep psychopath!
Here you go, cunt.
Charlie Kirk was not murdered by Tyler Robinson who was only a patsy set up to take the fall
Charlie Kirk was betrayed by insiders at Turning Point USA including staff members who failed to protect him
Foreign governments such as Israel France and Egypt were involved in planning or carrying out the assassination
State and federal law enforcement agencies are actively covering up the true perpetrators and a larger conspiracy
Erika Kirk had been followed and tracked by Egyptian planes for years prior to the murder
Erika Kirk lied about her upbringing and being raised by a single mother when records show otherwise
Erika Kirk provided false information about her birthdate with conflicting details in family divorce papers and public records
Erika Kirk displayed suspicious behavior by laughing and sounding off-putting in a staff meeting just days after her husband was killed
Erika Kirk is complicit in or directly benefited from a cover-up surrounding her husband's assassination
The official lone gunman narrative pushed by authorities and Turning Point USA is a complete fabrication meant to gaslight the public
Charlie Kirk had foreknowledge of his own death predicted it to others and may have been a time traveler with special insight
Erika Kirk has lied repeatedly about her personal history marriage dynamics family background and role after the murder
Erika Kirk's alibis timelines and travel records around the assassination do not add up and contain major inconsistencies
Erika Kirk is not grieving appropriately and her public appearances fundraising and leadership moves are suspicious and self-serving
Turning Point USA executives conspired with others to set Charlie Kirk up and are now protecting the real killers
The evidence in the police affidavit including surveillance DNA bullet casings and text messages is fake and fabricated
Security details including bodyguards failed on purpose or participated in allowing the assassination to happen
Erika Kirk has hidden details about life insurance policies and financial benefits she received from Charlie Kirk's death
Erika Kirk's family background and past contain shady elements including possible involvement in questionable activities that she lies about
The court proceedings and evidence presented against Tyler Robinson are rushed incomplete and designed to close the case prematurely
Charlie Kirk was marked for death since childhood by powerful forces and agents who surrounded him his whole life
Erika Kirk has manipulated the public narrative about her marriage and widowhood to gain sympathy power and money at Turning Point USA
These are only a few of the lies. She has told thousands.
@KarlWuckert read them and weep psychopath!
Here you go, cunt.
Charlie Kirk was not murdered by Tyler Robinson who was only a patsy set up to take the fall
Charlie Kirk was betrayed by insiders at Turning Point USA including staff members who failed to protect him
Foreign governments such as Israel France and Egypt were involved in planning or carrying out the assassination
State and federal law enforcement agencies are actively covering up the true perpetrators and a larger conspiracy
Erika Kirk had been followed and tracked by Egyptian planes for years prior to the murder
Erika Kirk lied about her upbringing and being raised by a single mother when records show otherwise
Erika Kirk provided false information about her birthdate with conflicting details in family divorce papers and public records
Erika Kirk displayed suspicious behavior by laughing and sounding off-putting in a staff meeting just days after her husband was killed
Erika Kirk is complicit in or directly benefited from a cover-up surrounding her husband's assassination
The official lone gunman narrative pushed by authorities and Turning Point USA is a complete fabrication meant to gaslight the public
Charlie Kirk had foreknowledge of his own death predicted it to others and may have been a time traveler with special insight
Erika Kirk has lied repeatedly about her personal history marriage dynamics family background and role after the murder
Erika Kirk's alibis timelines and travel records around the assassination do not add up and contain major inconsistencies
Erika Kirk is not grieving appropriately and her public appearances fundraising and leadership moves are suspicious and self-serving
Turning Point USA executives conspired with others to set Charlie Kirk up and are now protecting the real killers
The evidence in the police affidavit including surveillance DNA bullet casings and text messages is fake and fabricated
Security details including bodyguards failed on purpose or participated in allowing the assassination to happen
Erika Kirk has hidden details about life insurance policies and financial benefits she received from Charlie Kirk's death
Erika Kirk's family background and past contain shady elements including possible involvement in questionable activities that she lies about
The court proceedings and evidence presented against Tyler Robinson are rushed incomplete and designed to close the case prematurely
Charlie Kirk was marked for death since childhood by powerful forces and agents who surrounded him his whole life
Erika Kirk has manipulated the public narrative about her marriage and widowhood to gain sympathy power and money at Turning Point USA
These are only a few of the lies. She has told thousands.
@Oh_Katie_Babie read them and weep psychopath!
Here you go, cunt.
Charlie Kirk was not murdered by Tyler Robinson who was only a patsy set up to take the fall
Charlie Kirk was betrayed by insiders at Turning Point USA including staff members who failed to protect him
Foreign governments such as Israel France and Egypt were involved in planning or carrying out the assassination
State and federal law enforcement agencies are actively covering up the true perpetrators and a larger conspiracy
Erika Kirk had been followed and tracked by Egyptian planes for years prior to the murder
Erika Kirk lied about her upbringing and being raised by a single mother when records show otherwise
Erika Kirk provided false information about her birthdate with conflicting details in family divorce papers and public records
Erika Kirk displayed suspicious behavior by laughing and sounding off-putting in a staff meeting just days after her husband was killed
Erika Kirk is complicit in or directly benefited from a cover-up surrounding her husband's assassination
The official lone gunman narrative pushed by authorities and Turning Point USA is a complete fabrication meant to gaslight the public
Charlie Kirk had foreknowledge of his own death predicted it to others and may have been a time traveler with special insight
Erika Kirk has lied repeatedly about her personal history marriage dynamics family background and role after the murder
Erika Kirk's alibis timelines and travel records around the assassination do not add up and contain major inconsistencies
Erika Kirk is not grieving appropriately and her public appearances fundraising and leadership moves are suspicious and self-serving
Turning Point USA executives conspired with others to set Charlie Kirk up and are now protecting the real killers
The evidence in the police affidavit including surveillance DNA bullet casings and text messages is fake and fabricated
Security details including bodyguards failed on purpose or participated in allowing the assassination to happen
Erika Kirk has hidden details about life insurance policies and financial benefits she received from Charlie Kirk's death
Erika Kirk's family background and past contain shady elements including possible involvement in questionable activities that she lies about
The court proceedings and evidence presented against Tyler Robinson are rushed incomplete and designed to close the case prematurely
Charlie Kirk was marked for death since childhood by powerful forces and agents who surrounded him his whole life
Erika Kirk has manipulated the public narrative about her marriage and widowhood to gain sympathy power and money at Turning Point USA
These are only a few of the lies. She has told thousands.
Here you go, cunt.
Charlie Kirk was not murdered by Tyler Robinson who was only a patsy set up to take the fall
Charlie Kirk was betrayed by insiders at Turning Point USA including staff members who failed to protect him
Foreign governments such as Israel France and Egypt were involved in planning or carrying out the assassination
State and federal law enforcement agencies are actively covering up the true perpetrators and a larger conspiracy
Erika Kirk had been followed and tracked by Egyptian planes for years prior to the murder
Erika Kirk lied about her upbringing and being raised by a single mother when records show otherwise
Erika Kirk provided false information about her birthdate with conflicting details in family divorce papers and public records
Erika Kirk displayed suspicious behavior by laughing and sounding off-putting in a staff meeting just days after her husband was killed
Erika Kirk is complicit in or directly benefited from a cover-up surrounding her husband's assassination
The official lone gunman narrative pushed by authorities and Turning Point USA is a complete fabrication meant to gaslight the public
Charlie Kirk had foreknowledge of his own death predicted it to others and may have been a time traveler with special insight
Erika Kirk has lied repeatedly about her personal history marriage dynamics family background and role after the murder
Erika Kirk's alibis timelines and travel records around the assassination do not add up and contain major inconsistencies
Erika Kirk is not grieving appropriately and her public appearances fundraising and leadership moves are suspicious and self-serving
Turning Point USA executives conspired with others to set Charlie Kirk up and are now protecting the real killers
The evidence in the police affidavit including surveillance DNA bullet casings and text messages is fake and fabricated
Security details including bodyguards failed on purpose or participated in allowing the assassination to happen
Erika Kirk has hidden details about life insurance policies and financial benefits she received from Charlie Kirk's death
Erika Kirk's family background and past contain shady elements including possible involvement in questionable activities that she lies about
The court proceedings and evidence presented against Tyler Robinson are rushed incomplete and designed to close the case prematurely
Charlie Kirk was marked for death since childhood by powerful forces and agents who surrounded him his whole life
Erika Kirk has manipulated the public narrative about her marriage and widowhood to gain sympathy power and money at Turning Point USA
These are only a few of the lies. She has told thousands.
@Ghostofcynthia Wonderful work! You’re better than most journalists
@JustTheTweets17 @SteveBakerUSA No people are turning on her because they realize she has supported whack nuts like you
@realDonaldTrump @abcnews @NBCNews President Trump, please pull the license of both ABC and NBC now! They are enemies of our country and enemies of our people. Also every journalist of these treasonous organizations need to be arrested.
Calumny, also known as slander, is considered a grave sin. Calumny involves making false statements that harm another person's reputation. It is different from detraction, which involves revealing true but hidden faults about someone.
Scripture condemns giving false witness in various places, notably in the Decalogue (Exodus 20:16). The Catechism of the Catholic Church addresses calumny in paragraphs CCC 2477-2479, emphasizing the duty to preserve the reputation of others and to make amends if one has damaged it.
Calumny is generally considered a grave matter because it directly injures the virtue of justice, which includes respecting the truth and the good name of others. Thus, calumny can be a mortal sin if the matter is serious and the person knowingly and willingly engages in it.
Calumny causes reputational damage, which can lead to social, professional, or personal harm. By spreading falsehoods, calumny destabilizes trust within communities, an issue requiring attention in an age of disinformation spread rapidly on social media.
Calumny requires the necessity of reparation: this includes a) retracting the false statement publicly if it was made publicly; b) apologizing to the person wronged and making sincere efforts to restore the person's reputation.
Apart from the apparent social and legal implications, calumny can lead to spiritual damage, separating the individual from God's grace unless repented for and absolved through the Sacrament of Penance. If clergy or religious are the objects of calumny, it can injure the credibility of the Church's ministers, and injure the trust that should exist between them and the faithful.
In conclusion, calumny is not only a grave sin against one's neighbor, but also against truth and the virtue of justice, requiring sincere repentance and active reparation to rectify the wrong done.
@KarlWuckert Hell is waiting for your Karl. Repent now!
Calumny, also known as slander, is considered a grave sin. Calumny involves making false statements that harm another person's reputation. It is different from detraction, which involves revealing true but hidden faults about someone.
Scripture condemns giving false witness in various places, notably in the Decalogue (Exodus 20:16). The Catechism of the Catholic Church addresses calumny in paragraphs CCC 2477-2479, emphasizing the duty to preserve the reputation of others and to make amends if one has damaged it.
Calumny is generally considered a grave matter because it directly injures the virtue of justice, which includes respecting the truth and the good name of others. Thus, calumny can be a mortal sin if the matter is serious and the person knowingly and willingly engages in it.
Calumny causes reputational damage, which can lead to social, professional, or personal harm. By spreading falsehoods, calumny destabilizes trust within communities, an issue requiring attention in an age of disinformation spread rapidly on social media.
Calumny requires the necessity of reparation: this includes a) retracting the false statement publicly if it was made publicly; b) apologizing to the person wronged and making sincere efforts to restore the person's reputation.
Apart from the apparent social and legal implications, calumny can lead to spiritual damage, separating the individual from God's grace unless repented for and absolved through the Sacrament of Penance. If clergy or religious are the objects of calumny, it can injure the credibility of the Church's ministers, and injure the trust that should exist between them and the faithful.
In conclusion, calumny is not only a grave sin against one's neighbor, but also against truth and the virtue of justice, requiring sincere repentance and active reparation to rectify the wrong done.
@KarlWuckert https://t.co/EOmBRl8Zla
Calumny, also known as slander, is considered a grave sin. Calumny involves making false statements that harm another person's reputation. It is different from detraction, which involves revealing true but hidden faults about someone.
Scripture condemns giving false witness in various places, notably in the Decalogue (Exodus 20:16). The Catechism of the Catholic Church addresses calumny in paragraphs CCC 2477-2479, emphasizing the duty to preserve the reputation of others and to make amends if one has damaged it.
Calumny is generally considered a grave matter because it directly injures the virtue of justice, which includes respecting the truth and the good name of others. Thus, calumny can be a mortal sin if the matter is serious and the person knowingly and willingly engages in it.
Calumny causes reputational damage, which can lead to social, professional, or personal harm. By spreading falsehoods, calumny destabilizes trust within communities, an issue requiring attention in an age of disinformation spread rapidly on social media.
Calumny requires the necessity of reparation: this includes a) retracting the false statement publicly if it was made publicly; b) apologizing to the person wronged and making sincere efforts to restore the person's reputation.
Apart from the apparent social and legal implications, calumny can lead to spiritual damage, separating the individual from God's grace unless repented for and absolved through the Sacrament of Penance. If clergy or religious are the objects of calumny, it can injure the credibility of the Church's ministers, and injure the trust that should exist between them and the faithful.
In conclusion, calumny is not only a grave sin against one's neighbor, but also against truth and the virtue of justice, requiring sincere repentance and active reparation to rectify the wrong done.
Calumny, also known as slander, is considered a grave sin. Calumny involves making false statements that harm another person's reputation. It is different from detraction, which involves revealing true but hidden faults about someone.
Scripture condemns giving false witness in various places, notably in the Decalogue (Exodus 20:16). The Catechism of the Catholic Church addresses calumny in paragraphs CCC 2477-2479, emphasizing the duty to preserve the reputation of others and to make amends if one has damaged it.
Calumny is generally considered a grave matter because it directly injures the virtue of justice, which includes respecting the truth and the good name of others. Thus, calumny can be a mortal sin if the matter is serious and the person knowingly and willingly engages in it.
Calumny causes reputational damage, which can lead to social, professional, or personal harm. By spreading falsehoods, calumny destabilizes trust within communities, an issue requiring attention in an age of disinformation spread rapidly on social media.
Calumny requires the necessity of reparation: this includes a) retracting the false statement publicly if it was made publicly; b) apologizing to the person wronged and making sincere efforts to restore the person's reputation.
Apart from the apparent social and legal implications, calumny can lead to spiritual damage, separating the individual from God's grace unless repented for and absolved through the Sacrament of Penance. If clergy or religious are the objects of calumny, it can injure the credibility of the Church's ministers, and injure the trust that should exist between them and the faithful.
In conclusion, calumny is not only a grave sin against one's neighbor, but also against truth and the virtue of justice, requiring sincere repentance and active reparation to rectify the wrong done.
@KarlWuckert https://t.co/EOmBRl8Zla
Calumny, also known as slander, is considered a grave sin. Calumny involves making false statements that harm another person's reputation. It is different from detraction, which involves revealing true but hidden faults about someone.
Scripture condemns giving false witness in various places, notably in the Decalogue (Exodus 20:16). The Catechism of the Catholic Church addresses calumny in paragraphs CCC 2477-2479, emphasizing the duty to preserve the reputation of others and to make amends if one has damaged it.
Calumny is generally considered a grave matter because it directly injures the virtue of justice, which includes respecting the truth and the good name of others. Thus, calumny can be a mortal sin if the matter is serious and the person knowingly and willingly engages in it.
Calumny causes reputational damage, which can lead to social, professional, or personal harm. By spreading falsehoods, calumny destabilizes trust within communities, an issue requiring attention in an age of disinformation spread rapidly on social media.
Calumny requires the necessity of reparation: this includes a) retracting the false statement publicly if it was made publicly; b) apologizing to the person wronged and making sincere efforts to restore the person's reputation.
Apart from the apparent social and legal implications, calumny can lead to spiritual damage, separating the individual from God's grace unless repented for and absolved through the Sacrament of Penance. If clergy or religious are the objects of calumny, it can injure the credibility of the Church's ministers, and injure the trust that should exist between them and the faithful.
In conclusion, calumny is not only a grave sin against one's neighbor, but also against truth and the virtue of justice, requiring sincere repentance and active reparation to rectify the wrong done.
@gc22gc I voted to be protected from a nuclear weapon yes, you stupid bitch. You are a poster child for why women should not vote.
@JustTheTweets17 Calumny is a mortal sin that will send you to hell!
Calumny, also known as slander, is considered a grave sin. Calumny involves making false statements that harm another person's reputation. It is different from detraction, which involves revealing true but hidden faults about someone.
Scripture condemns giving false witness in various places, notably in the Decalogue (Exodus 20:16). The Catechism of the Catholic Church addresses calumny in paragraphs CCC 2477-2479, emphasizing the duty to preserve the reputation of others and to make amends if one has damaged it.
Calumny is generally considered a grave matter because it directly injures the virtue of justice, which includes respecting the truth and the good name of others. Thus, calumny can be a mortal sin if the matter is serious and the person knowingly and willingly engages in it.
Calumny causes reputational damage, which can lead to social, professional, or personal harm. By spreading falsehoods, calumny destabilizes trust within communities, an issue requiring attention in an age of disinformation spread rapidly on social media.
Calumny requires the necessity of reparation: this includes a) retracting the false statement publicly if it was made publicly; b) apologizing to the person wronged and making sincere efforts to restore the person's reputation.
Apart from the apparent social and legal implications, calumny can lead to spiritual damage, separating the individual from God's grace unless repented for and absolved through the Sacrament of Penance. If clergy or religious are the objects of calumny, it can injure the credibility of the Church's ministers, and injure the trust that should exist between them and the faithful.
In conclusion, calumny is not only a grave sin against one's neighbor, but also against truth and the virtue of justice, requiring sincere repentance and active reparation to rectify the wrong done.
@CandaceGuardian @RealCandaceO Hell is waiting for you, Maya! Calumnious, snakes like you are daughters of Satan and with your idol Candace, you will be in a cell in hell forever. Too bad you won’t get to be near Candace because Satan isolates you.
@AwakenedOutlaw Arrest all journalists at all 3 networks now!
@julie_dbay So who are you going to believe? A woman who doesn’t know thunder and lightning go together? Or the most preeminent conservative historian with a PhD?
Victor Davis Hanson asks if Candace Owens has any decency left
@VDHanson "This is the absolute end of Candace Owens.
You're disgraced and you've lied to millions of people. You've caused undue harm and trauma to the family. You're trying to destroy the whole image of Charlie Kirk with all of these plots.
Candace Owens, have you no decency?
And she doesn't"
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Estetik Hemşire
Seen from Turkey
Hamad
صديق مصرى
Seen from Egypt
Buse altınbaş
Seen from Turkey
al
Seen from Indonesia
ชายแท้ 100%(ชายแท้บ้านนอกตัวจริง)
Seen from Thailand
fuck my wife
Seen from France
Aile İfsacisi
Seen from Turkey
คู่ผัวไทยเมียลาวชอบดูเมียโดนเย็ด
Seen from Thailand
ALANYA'LI BEYAZ ZENCİ
Seen from Switzerland
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.2M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
111.8M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.2M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
88.3M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
82.2M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
73.7M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
71M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.1M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.3M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
63.8M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
61.4M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers