@esschaffer If the science was perfectly clear, they’d either completely remove it or resume administration. For whatever reason, the clinical (and statistical) experts aren’t convinced either way - so they paused it. Reassuring people in the meantime seems like a reasonable thing to do.
@esschaffer You’re assuming the numberator is correct - clinicians were unaware of the possible side effect and perhaps didn’t report it. This isn’t J&J vs COVID. There are alternatives that might be safer. Seams reasonable to treat peoples anxiety with reassurance and obtain more data.
@esschaffer “The risk is extremely low” - reassure someone that the risk to them of the J&J vaccine they got 10 day’s ago is almost zero.
“It makes sense to pause the administration of it” - we need more safety data.
Science and good clinical care don’t always align 100%.
COVID-19 Update: Tuesday, 3/24/20
Here is today’s #COVID19 crisis update and links to previous letters from Dr. Craig Smith: https://t.co/7XKy4Pk3mA #coronavirus#COVIDー19#StayHome
Every day Dr. Craig Smith, Chair of the Dept of Surgery, sends out a #Covid_19 update. We will be posting them here each evening.
This is the COVID-19 update for today, 3/20/20
@SRuhle https://t.co/kVOkJXgXyx
I'm the one on the left. Really appreciate your support, everyone! Attached is an article about what it's like to be in our shoes. Never again!