LETS MAKE Ryley FAMOUS ❤️❤️
Nobody moved. So he did. ❤️❤️
Last Tuesday afternoon at a canal near a busy walking path, a toddler slipped through a gap in a railing and hit the water.
Adults froze. Seconds passed.
Then Ryley — 15 years old — took off his shoes and jumped in.
The water was deep. The child was too small to keep their head up. Ryley reached the toddler, got underneath them, and pushed the child's face above the surface. No flotation device. No lifeguard vest. Just a teenager using his own body as a raft.
He held that position — arms raised, treading water — until emergency responders arrived and lifted the child to safety.
Witnesses said he moved before most people had even processed what was happening.
Ryley went home that same evening. No press conference. No ceremony. He reportedly told his mum it "wasn't a big deal."
The toddler is safe. Recovering. Going home to their family.
And somewhere out there, a 15-year-old kid is probably back in school right now — sitting in class, doing homework — completely unaware that the world needs to know his name.
His name is Ryley 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👌🏾🙏🏾
@theninakai Is she seriously suggesting that midwives treat some mothers-to-be to a lower standard because they are black? If I was a midwife, I would be furious.
@RayAlexWilliams Yes, your belief that men can get pregnant put you on an intellectual pedestal so far above us all that it creates an optical illusion where it seems like you are actually talking out of your arse.
Don't look back in anger.
I hope this man gets the mental health care he needs.
Don't blame all white people, terrorism has no race.
White natives are the most vulnerable right now. Protect them from anti-white backlash and uplift those facing extreme poverty and marginalisation in Britain.
Beware the far left politicising this. We need unity, not division.
Britain has a huge knife crime problem. Labour must restrict knives.
I am no longer surprised at the degree of intellectual vacuity contained in your posts, but this one is especially worthy of comment.
“We have a responsibility to our trans constituents to resist it.”
Actually, you have a responsibility to your female constituents to fully support it. Yjis is because it is a code of conduct specifically written to assist in the effective implementation of settled law.
“The Code will exclude trans people from services and facilities that they have long used without issue ”
The Code will do no such thing. This statement is either a deliberate lie or a further example of legislative incompetence. Both explanations are probably in play here.
Trans people are not ‘excluded’ from any services. They are specifically included in all services provided based on their birth sex. There isn’t a single-sex service that trans people are excluded from.
If a trans individual has previously used services designated for the opposite sex, they have done so in contravention of the law, in which single-sex services have always been segregated by reference to biological sex. It is the responsibility of the trans individuals concerned, and those who have been advising them erroneously; if they have been acting unlawfully.
It is false to claim that these historical abuses of single-sex spaces has passed ‘without issue’. There are countless examples of detriment to women and girls and a long history of trans infiltration being challenged.
There is no evidence that using correct-sex facilities will make trans individuals more likely to be the victims of violence.
Trans individuals will not be ‘pushed out of public life’ as they have the right to access public facilities appropriate to their sex.
“It ushers in an era of enforced segregation for trans people.”
This is another lie. Any ‘segregation’ that occurs is a) the result of the proper interpretation of the Equality Act and b) based on the material reality of sex. It only requires any ‘enforcement’ due to the insistence of, in particular, trans identifying men that they are entitled to ignore the law, transgress women’s boundaries and infiltrate female spaves for the purpose of validating their identities and exercising their fetishes.\
”The Code represents a profound rollback of rights,”
This is also a lie. No ‘rights’ have been ‘rolled back’. The Code implements the law as clarified in the For Women Scotland Case, which found that it has ALWAYS been the law that single-sex spaces are segregated by biological sex, meaning that it has never been a ‘right’ for a male person (whatever his ‘identity’) to invae and colonise female spaces.