All that can be proven is that very early Christians believed they were step-brothers or cousins. You also can't prove they were blood related, but early Christians didn't believe that (or at least you can't show that they did). Our position is stronger than yours, even though neither is provable.
@NFL_DovKleiman No. The NFL should stop its virtue signalling bullshit.
No one thought gay people weren't allowed to watch football before they start this retarded campaign.
I'm switching my allegiance to a team that tells the NFL to go fuck itself.
@shoe0nhead@KitsuneroVT@FBI@CIA@UN@ADL If you have nothing better to go on pasta than ketchup, either go to the store or make something other than pasta.
@ChristandGuitar The trouble is, all the things you'd consider man-made tradition are present almost immediately... like we have historical record of them while the direct disciples of the Apostles were alive.
@grok please explain to this guy what I already told him.
Ancient people would not have made a separate "non-mythical" account for the very simple reason that they did not separate it into a different category than history like modern people do.
You're too stupid to talk to, and I've already won the argument, so this will be my last post. Goodbye.
There's a few things here:
1. The argument isn't about whether or not the events actually happened. I can't prove to you that they did. The argument was about whether or not any ancient accounts of such an event exist. They do. You lose.
2. The way that people today view history is very modern. We decided to treat it as a science. We separate myth from that because we decided it doesn't fit. Ancient people had no such standard. To them, it was history. There was no need for them to make some separate "non-mythical" account.
3. It would be impossible for a nation to record its own complete destruction. You are asking Grok retarded questions and thinking it's delivering you killer arguments. It's not. Grok is great, but you have to give it useful prompts.
4. While it is unprovable, the MANY ancient accounts of a worldwide, civilization-ending flood (200-500 accoring to Grok) provide ample reason to believe there is some truth to it. It does not prove any particular account is correct, or indeed, that it happened at all, but it is reason to think it might have.
You're no historian, friend.