@Peston Trump emboldens nations to prioritize their own interests: sovereignty, vetted immigration, secure borders, reindustrialization, ditching failed green energy policy, protecting kids from irreversible pubertyblockers/surgeries. Common sense. Where did institutional norms get us?
💯But don’t forget these condo developers & Chinese money launderers are big Liberal supporters. That’s the relevant fact here, not affordable housing.
Canada
Your prime minister was installed. It's true.
He then won the election after having little chance.
Then he made deals to steal a majority.
His biggest accomplishment is enriching his own portfolio.
You are the only nation in the g20 having a recession.
They've shut down debate and are just ramming through bills to become law and entrap you in a digital prison.
And the majority defend it, love it, thank it.
Canada is being fleeced, we're being robbed, and most aren't mad at the people doing it, they're mad at the people seeing it.
@TFL1728 Bloomberg is against EVERYTHING Trump does. It's so transparent. Odd, considering the clientele it serves (business) is more right leaning (and Trump supporting) than most demos. They'll be out of business like the rest of msm. Probably wld be already if not for their terminals.
10 June: Canada tables an under-16 social media ban + age checks for everyone.
Five days later, Starmer announces the same for Britain.
Same policy. Same timing. Same “safety” language.
Coincidence - or another piece of the global censorship agenda?
Oh, hey Canadians!
Keir Starmer and his Labor government are pushing the exact same under 16 internet legislation as the Carney Liberals at the exact same time.
Now I know the concept of actual sovereignty is foreign to you, but considering the UK and Canada are supposed to be technically sovereign nations, isn't it a bit odd that both governments are pushing the same internet legislation at the same time?
This isn't the first time either. Bill C-9 is a mirror image of the UK's hate speech legislation and that bill just became law.
Anyways, you may want to look into this. It's starting to seem like something outside of our governments is making the decisions and our elected leaders are just puppets for it.
I know... Tinfoil hat, conspiracy theorist, MAGA Nazis and all that. But maybe just stop and think for a second. How do the UK, EU, Australia and Canada all coordinate the same legislation at the same time? They're not supposed to do that. Their systems are set up specifically to prevent such a thing from happening.
But it is... And I don't know about you, but it's starting to feel like something very bad is headed our way.
Fans at UFC 250 acted with class.
They proudly sang O Canada for Aiemann Zahabi.
Meanwhile, the “Elbows Up” crowd at the FIFA World Cup game in Toronto booed the U.S. anthem.
One side acted petty.
The other showed respect.
That says a lot. 🇨🇦🇺🇸
@TFL1728 , @the_irascible , @_tommyspodcast
June13.
#IRGC#Iran posturing plus #UFC show are likely a cover for other events taking place ... this past week's disclosure by Tulsi Gabbard, Pulte's job, and DOJ actions are a sign.
00:17:00
👇
https://t.co/76mZ9SniKQ
@WallStreetMav She hasn't won. It's too close to call. Stop saying this it's impacting your credibility. There are other right wing wins in Central and South America but not Peru. It's easily verifiable.
With the upcoming social media ban bill, what the government appears to be saying is: "You are too stupid to use the tools Apple and Google provide FOR FREE to control what your kids have access to online, so we will do it for you."
That in itself is insulting, but that's not the true aim of this government. They couldn't give a single solitary hockey puck about that. The true aim is quite simple: Force social networks, and then all other online service providers to ID all users (with 3D face scans). Then:
- Bill C-22 forces providers to keep this data for 12 months, and make it available to the government.
- Bill C-9 criminalizes what you can and cannot say online, with penalties up to 10 years and seizure of assets.
- Bill C-8 allows a random government bureaucrat to cut you off the Internet, no court order needed.
Together these bills create a dystopian nightmare Orwell could not even imagine. Here is a scenario.
You post criticism of a government policy. Government calls it 'hate material'. C-22 metadata retention flags your activity and hands your identity and metadata (contacts, timings, locations) to authorities. You get prosecuted under C-9, facing up to 10 years in prison and asset seizures. A bureaucrat also issues a C-8 order cutting you off the internet entirely, while you await trial. Not that you care, as you're probably in jail, likely with no bail.
This post can likely be labeled "hate speech" given how loose and ambiguous the standards are.
Since coming to power in 2015 the Liberals have appointed over 740 of our roughly 1000 federal judges, 7 of the 9 Supreme Court judges, and 100 of the 105 senators.
The government also pays roughly 30% of every reporter’s salary in Canada.
@integrity_to Need your help. I live at Bathurst Eglinton. There is yet another consultation re allen/Eglinton traffic. Not sure how to influence this whether organizing petitions from my street/neighborhood or something else. Pls advise. These people are beyond incompetent.