Jay Chappell

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@molmccann Then you don’t support Vivak Ramiswamy’s candidacy?

He doesn’t deserve to be on a ballot for governor of Ohio?

Maybe just say you’re tired of seeing babies of a different skin color in your town.

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@bofrench How about you talk about railroads?

Isn’t that the job you’re trying to get? Instead you issue these ignorant and impotent tweets showing you actually don’t know what you’re talking about.

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@CJGRISHAM Searches your feed for similar criticism of Vivak Ramiswamy… hmm don’t see anything.

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@KennethRWebster Cry harder. You support a candidate who’s committed crimes and uses his office to try to enrich himself.

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@Notwokenow Person too afraid to post under their real name wants you to call ICE without cause.

Would SWAT her neighbors and then lie to their face saying how awful it was that it happened.

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@ChaseForLiberty Which militia do you belong to?

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@KennethRWebster Moronic.

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@leachfortexas Insanely stupid post.

Amazing a political candidate doesn’t understand law.

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@willchamberlain What a racist asshole you are.

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@molmccann That is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Take your fake racist tears someplace else.

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@bofrench What role does immigration have in the railroad business. I wouldn’t vote for you bc it seems you have far too much time on your hands to care about illegal immigration than overseeing the railroads.

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@mcroles @MattMackowiak And then they went on to say that it’s impossible to construe the words “subject to the jurisdiction” as less comprehensive than the words “within its jurisdiction”

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@mcroles @MattMackowiak Supreme Court in 1898 traced the interpretation of these words from English law through 1898. Subject to the jurisdiction “can never be construed to grant exemptions from jurisdiction of the country in which the foreigners are found” when in a country for business or pleasure

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@mcroles @MattMackowiak John Marshall^^

Then they go on to say “it is impossible to construe the words ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ as less comprehensive than the words ‘within its jurisdiction’ or to hold that persons ‘within the jurisdiction’ are not ‘subject to the jurisdiction’”

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@mcroles @MattMackowiak Interestingly it was Harry Reid, a Democrat, who began pushing in the 1990s for a reinterpretation of birthright citizenship. Then Trump and the drafters of Project 2025 pushed it harder and with more authority.

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@mcroles @MattMackowiak So saying that a court needs to delve into the mind of someone within the jurisdiction to see if they are sufficiently loyal and obedient is a misreading of the law and of the idea of what jurisdiction means.

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@mcroles @MattMackowiak I do not think someone who posts as much about the second amendment as you do would like the judicial interpretation of, well the drafters could never have anticipated such cultural, and technological changes that we should read in words that change the plain meaning of the law

[Jay Chappell @Jay_Chappell67]

@mcroles @MattMackowiak Also the interpretive model you promoted is unworkable. It will create a judicial mess in deciding whether a mother or expectant mother is sufficiently loyal to “subject her to the jurisdiction of the US.”