@OpenAIDevs Feedback on the CX: Agent CX have progressed from human-in-the-loop to human-on-the-loop experiences. Consumers expect agents to just "do stuff" on their behalf either proactively or without constant back and forth. Appreciate the re-take tho. Thank you.
@OpenAIDevs Hugely appreciate the re-take. Being a product person myself, I applaude the courage it takes for someone to be “in the arena”. Haters gonna hate.
In the era of personal agents, Apple is the most under rated and likely the biggest beneficiary. Personal agents might just revive apple.
#apple#muse#agents
@FredaDuan@openclaw Enterprise agents (the one similar to Autopilot) is way more stickier than a consumer agents like Instinct/Muse. Enterprise has a lot more use cases (stay on top of mails, chat threads, compose weekly status updates, write docs, presentations, demos etc.) than consumer agents
@RihardJarc None of these agents being built by itself is defensible. We will have 100s of companies that will clone openclaw to build their own version of Muse.
Enterprise will see stronger adoption with Microsoft/AWS winning but consumer space will be a lot more fragmented
3) Find the sticky CX. Initial traction is great, but novelty fades. Once people have “played” with Muse for a few weeks, what brings them back every day?
First off, congrats to the Muse team — fantastic launch. And the mascot is 🔥
Now comes the harder part: how does Muse turn launch momentum into a durable business?
Three things I’d be thinking about:
2) The product is clonable. If the experience works, competitors can reverse-engineer the core ideas relatively quickly. The moat has to become more than the product itself.
1) Distribution is king. OpenAI and Google are likely thinking about similar experiences, but Apple may be the dark horse given its massive device distribution.
@thdxr Not true. Azure is the only hyper scaler that forces you to do provisioned throughput. Both GCO and AWS offer on demand for large amounts of compute