Jeanette Tunks

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

Absolute Fraud. She only put the headscarf on as a performative stunt to gain political power.

[Brandon Gill @realBrandonGill]

The solution to bringing down the price of diesel is not to vote for the party that supports transitioning America off fossil fuels entirely.

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

WOW 🚨 California resident just went into a polling location and voted. She says it’s a free for all for fraud

“I voted, and I was astonished at the things that I heard when I walked into that voting booth — you could be from anywhere and you need no ID, you don't need to show no proof of citizenship, you don't need to show nothing to be able to vote, y'all. That's crazy, ain't it?”

She literally just confirmed that they ask for NOTHING when voting in California, you just walk in and vote. It’s the honor system

Democrats are 100% stealing the elections in California. Now combine this with the ballot drop boxes, mail in ballots and ballot harvesting. It’s all fraud

No one should be paying taxes in California

[Jeanette Tunks @JeanetteTu73523]

@brivael Your last sentence is the biggest truth. And once you see it, you can’t unsee it. Every hour more people see.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Today, this is how the world is split.

On one side, the people who are waking up. The ones who've unplugged from legacy media and get their information elsewhere, directly, unfiltered. They've figured it out, and they're lining up behind Elon Musk. Alongside him, a large part of the right-leaning tech elite. Many of them still stay in the shadows, out of a lack of courage, let's be honest. But at least they're not toxic. They build.

On the other side, the legacy system. The political class, the media, academia, the courts, the whole institutional machine that lives off managing the masses and manufacturing consensus. A globalist system that, to push its project forward, leans on two levers: the far left and political Islam. Two forces with nothing in common except the one thing that matters: they fracture nations. And fractured peoples don't defend themselves.

Meanwhile, Musk and those around him are laying the foundations of a different world order. One built on private property, free speech, individual liberty and the freedom to build. Not an order imposed from above, but one that emerges through execution.

That's the real fight of our time. Not left vs right. Those who want to keep control vs those who want to give freedom back.

And the most interesting part is the momentum. The further we go, the more the system cracks. It can no longer hold the narrative. Just look at the collapse of trust in the media: 61% of French people now distrust them, up 7 points since 2023. People no longer believe what they're being told.

The monopoly on the narrative is over. And those who lost it won't get it back.

[C3 @C_3C_3]

A major red flag is when people who don’t have children call other people’s children…

“Our children”

From James Talarico to Randi Weingarten…

They don’t have children but they want to use yours for their agenda.

Once you see it you’ll never miss it again.

[Ron DeSantis @RonDeSantis]

Nice graph.

Really puts it into prospective that local governments are taking $13 billion over and above the 2019 baseline even when the baseline is increased for inflation and population growth.

[Jeanette Tunks @JeanetteTu73523]

@realannapaulina Not hard to spot this liar 🤥

[Anna Paulina Luna @realannapaulina]

Oh look. She is actually a Democrat.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

In my post on French Theory, I wrote that Foucault taught that truth doesn't exist, that there is only power. A lot of you asked me to go deeper.

So today, we focus on him. One man. And we'll see how an idea born in a Parisian lecture hall ended up demolishing everything that was still standing.

What Foucault theorized fits in one sentence: knowledge and power are inseparable. There is no pure truth on one side and power manipulating it on the other. Every truth is produced by a "regime of truth," a system of domination that decides what is allowed to count as true.

From there, he unrolls everything.

Madness? It isn't first and foremost an illness. It's a line society draws to exclude those who disturb it. Read History of Madness.

The prison, the school, the barracks, the hospital, the factory? Disciplinary machines, all built on the same model, designed to train bodies and manufacture docile individuals. Read Discipline and Punish.

Sexuality? Not a fact of nature, but an "apparatus" that power invented in the 19th century to classify, normalize and control people. Read The History of Sexuality.

And man himself? A recent invention, he writes, destined to be erased like a face drawn in sand at the edge of the sea.

You see the mechanism. Take any institution, any norm, any self-evident truth. Show that it has a history. Conclude that it's arbitrary. Then conclude that it's oppressive. Then conclude that it must be destroyed.

It's a suspicion machine. And it never stops.

Yet we need to remember something simple. Civilization was not perfect. It committed injustices, errors, cruelties. But over three thousand years of effort, from Athens to Jerusalem, from Rome to the cathedrals, from the Enlightenment to the laboratories, it had found something. Forms of truth. Imperfect, revisable, but real.

It knew that beauty exists and that it elevates us. That the family, a father, a mother, children, is the cell where things get passed down. That a man and a woman are different, and that this difference is a gift, not an oppression. That the teacher teaches and the student learns. That the doctor heals. That the judge punishes the guilty and protects the innocent. That science discovers reality instead of inventing it.

None of this was a conspiracy. It was accumulated experience. Wisdom paid for at a very high price, over centuries.

Foucauldian relativism, pushed to the extreme by his heirs, tore it all down.

Beauty, first. If every hierarchy is a power relation, then saying a Vermeer is worth more than a urinal is bourgeois domination. The result: a banana duct-taped to a wall sold for more than 6 million dollars. Public money poured into installations nobody looks at. Squares and roundabouts disfigured by works nobody asked for. Foucault didn't invent contemporary art, but his generation gave it its intellectual alibi: who are you to judge?

The family, next. If every norm is a control apparatus, then the nuclear family is just one historical construction among others, a "heteropatriarchal norm" to be deconstructed. We taught an entire generation that the father was suspect, that passing things down was a form of violence, and that the child belonged to no one.

Men and women. If sex is an apparatus of power, then the difference between a man and a woman is no longer a fact, it's a convention. And conventions can be renegotiated. We've reached the point where public officials hesitate on live television to say what a woman is. We taught boys that their masculinity was toxic and girls that their femininity was alienation. We made both of them miserable.

School. If school is a training machine, then the teacher's authority is oppression. We replaced transmission with "learner-centered" education, knowledge with skills, rigor with kindness. Standards collapsed, and it's always working-class kids who pay the highest price.

Justice. If prison is above all an instrument of domination, then the offender becomes a victim of the system and punishment becomes suspect. We ended up spending more time explaining crime than protecting the people who suffer from it.

Science, finally. If knowledge is an effect of power, then biology can be "told differently," facts become "narratives," and activist opinion is worth as much as proof.

Everywhere, the same move. Suspect. Deconstruct. Delegitimize. And never rebuild anything in its place.

That's what I call the empire of lies. A system that turned doubt into a religion, and that now punishes anyone who dares to state the obvious.

But this empire is falling. It's falling because reality always comes back. Because you can't deny biology, economics, beauty and human nature forever. Because an entire generation is discovering it was lied to, and it is hungry for truth.

When it falls, we will have to rebuild. Restore, one by one, the truths the intellectual left spent fifty years destroying. That there is true and false. Beautiful and ugly. Men and women. Families that pass things down. Teachers who teach. A justice system that protects. And be done with its rotten fruits, starting with the subsidized contemporary art that despises the very people it claims to liberate.

Foucault spent his life proving that everything was constructed.

Fine. Then let's build. But this time, let's build something true.

[Flopping Aces @FloppingAces]

The Democrats are so fucking desperate to prove Republicans are abandoning their party that they're now parading around their own monthly donors as political defectors.

And the funniest part? They apparently thought nobody would check.

Meet Rich Perlberg, the star of Democrat Abdul El-Sayed's Michigan Senate advertisement. He's introduced as a “lifelong Republican” who voted for Mike Rogers nine times before supposedly discovering that Rogers had become unacceptable.

Nine times! What a devastating betrayal! Somebody alert the networks!

Except this Republican stalwart was responsible for newspaper endorsements of John Kerry in 2004 and Barack Obama in 2008.

Whoops.

Then there's his Substack, “White Man's Burden,” where he champions progressive values, praises left-wing candidates, supports Medicare for All, and attacks the “Bible-clutching MAGA crowd.”

Apparently, the road from lifelong Republican to progressive Democrat is considerably shorter when you've already been traveling it for twenty fucking years.

But here's where this magnificent political clown show becomes absolutely humiliating.

Perlberg donated at least $450 to progressive congressional candidate William Lawrence. His political contributions have reportedly gone exclusively to Democrats since 2001.

And he contributes at least $50 every month to El-Sayed himself.

That's right. The Democratic candidate's shocking Republican convert is already helping bankroll the Democratic candidate.

Jesus Christ. They couldn't even find someone who wasn't on the donor list?

Now consider the wider spectacle. CBS, CNN, and NBC keep showcasing supposedly disillusioned lifelong Republicans, feeding the impression of a party hemorrhaging supporters just before the midterms.

And here's a Democratic campaign demonstrating exactly how conveniently that identity can be packaged when the audience never hears the rest of the biography.

They want Republicans believing their own coalition is collapsing.

Yet their poster boy for the great Republican exodus is a progressive advocate who's been supporting Democrats for decades.

Imagine being so desperate to manufacture defections that you start recruiting from your own fucking fundraising database.
(article below)

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Right now in the US, part of the Democratic Party has decided to play the "socialist" card. Days before the midterms, DSA candidates are winning primaries and the word isn't taboo anymore.

So today I'm going to show you why socialism never works. Not with ideology. With mechanics.

Let's start with a dumb question. How much should a loaf of bread cost?

You don't know. Neither do I. Nobody does. And that's exactly the point.

The price of a loaf of bread is the instant synthesis of millions of pieces of information that no single person holds: the wheat harvest in Kansas, the price of gas for the oven, the baker's wages, the shop's rent, a drought in Argentina, a war on the Black Sea, whether people feel like bread this morning or a bagel.

In 1920, Ludwig von Mises published a paper that should have ended the debate. His argument: without private ownership of the means of production, those means are never exchanged. No exchange, no prices. No prices, no economic calculation. The planner can't know whether a steel mill is worth more than a dam or a hospital. He's flying blind. He can't even tell that he's wrong.

In 1945, Friedrich Hayek drove the point home in "The Use of Knowledge in Society." Useful knowledge is scattered across millions of minds. The baker knows things about his neighborhood that no ministry ever will. Prices are a telecommunications system: when tin becomes scarce somewhere in the world, its price rises, and millions of users economize on it without even knowing why. No committee, no ministry, no plan can replicate that. The market isn't an ideology. It's a distributed information processor.

Then Milton Friedman picked up a simple pencil. The wood comes from Washington State, the graphite from South America, the rubber from Malaysia. Thousands of people who don't know each other, don't speak the same language, maybe even hate each other, cooperate to make something none of them could make alone. Nobody gave them orders. Prices were enough.

Now run the experiment in reverse. Set the price yourself.

Cap rents below market: landlords stop maintaining, stop building, housing disappears. Swedish economist Assar Lindbeck, a man of the left, said rent control is the most efficient technique known for destroying a city, short of bombing it.

Cap the price of flour: shelves empty, lines form, the black market takes over. Venezuela, 2016. The country with the largest oil reserves on earth, and people standing in line for hours to eat. Nearly 8 million Venezuelans eventually fled.

Socialism smashes the thermometer and then acts surprised that the fever keeps rising.

And this is where it gets serious.

Because when the plan fails, and it always fails, the planner has two options. Admit the plan is wrong. Or blame the people. Saboteurs, speculators, kulaks, enemies of the people.

He always picks the second one.

Hayek saw it in 1944 in The Road to Serfdom, in a chapter with a chilling title: Why the Worst Get on Top. A central plan requires central power. Central power attracts those who crave power. And when reality resists the plan, reality has to be broken. Which means people have to be broken.

Stalin. He collectivizes the land. Output collapses. He blames the peasants and seizes the harvests. The Holodomor, 1932-1933: millions starved to death in Ukraine, the breadbasket of Europe. Add the Gulag, the purges, the deportations.

Mao. The Great Leap Forward, 1958-1962. Backyard furnaces producing useless steel, insane grain quotas, local officials inflating numbers to avoid punishment, and the state requisitioning food based on those fake numbers. The result: the worst famine in human history. Estimates range from 30 to 45 million dead.

Pol Pot. The Khmer Rouge abolish money, markets, property, and empty the cities. The dream of total planning, carried all the way. In four years, roughly one in four Cambodians dies.

Hitler. He sent communists to the camps, but his party called itself National Socialist and the economy answered to the plan and the party. Companies stayed private on paper, but the state decided what to produce, at what price, and for whom. Hayek dedicated The Road to Serfdom "to the socialists of all parties" precisely because he saw the same root: the idea that the state must steer society toward a collective goal, and the individual must step aside.

Different eras. Different continents. Different cultures. Same mechanism. Same ending.

This isn't a bug. It's a feature of the system. Remove prices and you remove information. Remove information and you remove the ability to correct. And when you can no longer correct through prices, you correct through force.

So let me say it plainly. Socialism always starts nice. A rent freeze. Public grocery stores. Make "the rich" pay. Nobody promises the Gulag on day one.

But if America truly goes down this road, the rest of the story is already written. The plan will fail. There will need to be culprits. There will need to be power to punish them. And a socialist government holding the American state apparatus, its surveillance capabilities, its technology, its military, wouldn't be a regional tragedy. It could be the greatest tragedy in history.

The 20th century paid for this lesson with tens of millions of lives. We don't get to forget it in one generation.

Prices aren't the enemy of the people. Prices are the voice of the people.

[Jeanette Tunks @JeanetteTu73523]

@atensnut 🤥

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Most Western democracies have been hacked. Not with code. With institutional architecture. Let me show you how it works, using the most advanced example: the European Union.

First, how it works. Once every five years, you vote for a European Parliament that cannot even initiate legislation. The body that proposes laws is the Commission: 27 commissioners nobody elected, appointed after backroom bargaining between heads of state. Bills are then negotiated between the Commission, Parliament and Council in "trilogues", closed-door meetings where the real decisions get made. A law that will apply to 450 million people goes through corridors that 99.9% of them will never see.

Now look at who's in those corridors. Brussels has become the lobbying capital of the world: nearly 18,000 organizations on the transparency register, tens of thousands of lobbyists, more than 50 for every single MEP. And that's just the declared part. Add the revolving door: a former MEP only has to wait six months before becoming a lobbyist to the EU himself.

The real problem is distance. A national MP who votes for a law that ruins the farmers in his district runs into them at the market on Saturday. In Brussels, the decision-maker never meets the people who live with his decisions. But he meets lobbyists every day: at lunch, at cocktails, at conferences. So the system doesn't optimize for the wellbeing of the people. It optimizes for the interests of whoever is in the room. You don't even need corruption for that, incentives are enough. Although sometimes, as Qatargate showed, there's corruption too.

The result: the system has a structural incentive to accept things the people would never vote for.

Take Mercosur. Twenty-five years of negotiations. France votes against it in the Council in January 2026 and gets outvoted. To keep national parliaments from blocking it, the Commission splits the deal into two texts, including a trade agreement that only needs a vote in Brussels. The European Parliament itself writes, in black and white, that this split circumvents the right of national parliaments, and refers the deal to the EU Court of Justice. The Commission's response: it has been applying the agreement provisionally since May 1, 2026, without waiting for the Court's opinion. Farmers were protesting outside Parliament. They lost anyway.

And remember the one time the people were actually asked about Europe directly: in 2005, France and the Netherlands rejected the European Constitution. The text came back two years later as the Lisbon Treaty, ratified by parliaments. No more referendums.

But the worst of it is immigration. In 2015, relocation quotas were imposed by qualified majority on countries that had voted against them. Since June 12, 2026, the Pact on Migration and Asylum applies across the entire Union, with its "mandatory solidarity" mechanism: you take people in, or you pay. Not a single European people has ever been consulted directly on this, even though it's the issue that is transforming our societies most profoundly.

And this is where we have to talk about the most sophisticated piece of the machine: George Soros.

Soros understood before anyone else that you don't need to win elections if you shape the ecosystem around the people who make decisions. His network, the Open Society Foundations, describes itself as the largest private funder of advocacy groups in the world. In Brussels, it runs its own lobbying arm aimed at EU institutions, the Open Society European Policy Institute.

Here's what we know from internal documents leaked in 2016: a document titled "Reliable allies in the European Parliament" listed more than 200 MEPs. Strategy papers described building "inside-track groups" to caucus "internal allies" who could advance their goals in their daily work. Training sessions were organized for MEPs on how to counter so-called populist parties.

The mechanism is brutally elegant. Think tanks produce the "expertise". NGOs produce the "demand from civil society". Legal NGOs litigate in the courts. Funded media outlets produce the narrative. The Brussels decision-maker, cut off from the population, hears the same message from every direction and ends up believing that this is what people want.

And the craziest part: the institutions fund the loop themselves. Between 2021 and 2023, the EU paid around €7.4 billion to NGOs, and the European Court of Auditors found the use of that money insufficiently transparent. It even came out that the Commission had funded NGOs to lobby MEPs in favor of its own Green Deal legislation. The institution pays "civil society" to ask it to do what it already wanted to do.

All of this is legal. That's exactly what makes it a hack and not a crime. The system works exactly as designed, except nobody designed it for the people anymore.

The patch is simple to state and hard to impose: bring decisions back closer to the people who bear them, hold referendums on issues that change a civilization, create a mandatory register for every influence actor, NGOs included, with their funding sources, and shut the revolving door. Until that happens, European democracy will remain what it has become: a user interface sitting on top of a system that runs for someone else.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Here's how the system works.

No conspiracy, no secret room. Something far more solid: a century of patience.

It starts in an Italian prison. In the 1930s, Antonio Gramsci, locked up by Mussolini, tries to understand why the communist revolution failed in the West. The workers didn't follow. They were attached to their families, their faith, their homeland, their small property. His conclusion changed everything: you don't take power with rifles, you take it through culture. First you conquer the schools, the universities, the press, publishing, the theater. Once you control what people think, you don't need to seize the state. It falls on its own.

In 1967, the German student leader Rudi Dutschke gave it a name: the long march through the institutions.

In France, that march received a historic gift.

At the Liberation, de Gaulle distrusted the communists. He refused them the Interior, Defense, and Foreign Affairs. He kept the sword but let the mind slip away. A commission chaired by two communists, Paul Langevin and then Henri Wallon, drew up the plan for France's postwar schools. The Communist Party presented itself as the party of the martyrs of the Resistance, and the intelligentsia fell in line: Sartre, Aragon, the journals, the publishing houses, the teachers' unions. The right kept the ministries, and the left took the minds. That was the founding mistake. People believed power lived in the state, when it actually lived in the heads of those who would run the state tomorrow.

Then came May 68.

From the intellectual ruins of that era, France gave the world Foucault, Derrida, and Deleuze, three brilliant minds who forged, in the elegance of our language, the weapon that would paralyze the West. Foucault taught that truth doesn't exist, only power relations disguised as knowledge. Derrida taught that texts have no stable meaning and that every reading is a betrayal. Deleuze taught that we should prefer desire to law, the nomad to the settler, becoming to being.

Gramsci provided the strategy. French Theory provided the software.

Those texts crossed the Atlantic. Yale, Berkeley, and Columbia absorbed them in the 80s, where they met American puritanism, its racial guilt, and its obsession with identity. Judith Butler read Foucault and invented performative gender. Edward Said read Foucault and invented postcolonialism. Then came intersectionality. The matrix was always the same: there is no truth, only power, so every hierarchy is suspect, every norm is violence, and every majority is guilty. The child of that marriage is called wokeism, and today it's coming back to us like a boomerang, in our own universities.

Meanwhile, the infusion went on for forty years. A generation of professors trained a generation of journalists, judges, senior civil servants, and HR managers. Nobody needed to give orders. People came out of the same mold, hired those who thought like them, and pushed the others aside. That's what capturing an institution looks like: not a coup, but slow sedimentation.

Above the nations, a structure was built that answers to no one. Europe, dreamed up as a common market among free peoples, became a machine for producing norms, directives, and regulations, far from voters, far from borders, far from reality.

Today the loop is closed.

In 2016, the Davos forum promoted a vision of 2030 summed up in one line: "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy." It came from a former Danish socialist minister. In Brussels, they passed the DSA, which turns platforms into auxiliaries of censorship. For years they've been negotiating a regulation that would allow your private messages to be scanned. They're preparing a digital ID and a digital euro. Every time with a nice justification, and every time with a little less freedom.

And who's at the controls? Look at the résumés. Emmanuel Macron was a card-carrying member of the Socialist Party before becoming François Hollande's economy minister. Gabriel Attal was a Socialist Party activist for ten years and learned the trade in a socialist minister's office. They changed labels, not software.

That software rests on one belief: human beings are interchangeable, and so are cultures. Mass immigration isn't a problem, then. It's a step toward a finally equal world. They don't understand that it's impossible by design. A culture doesn't vanish into a vacuum. When a civilization gives up on itself, another one, more sure of itself, takes its place. This left courted political Islam as an electoral base and an ally against "the system." But political Islam shares none of its dreams. It doesn't want an equal, borderless world. It has its own project. Those who thought they could use it will end up devoured by it.

The craziest part is that there are hardly any true believers left. Inside these institutions, almost nobody sincerely believes in the project anymore. No small group is pulling the strings. There are incentives: thousands of people whose salaries, status, grants, and careers depend on keeping the fiction alive. Admitting they were wrong would cost them their position, their prestige, their standard of living. So they prefer the collective lie. They double down on what doesn't work, because admitting failure would cost them more than carrying on.

It's that dumb. People who understood nothing about economics or human nature built a system that only holds as long as nobody looks at it.

So here is the real fight of our time. It isn't left versus right. It's a simpler question: what world do we want?

The first is a world of strong nations and strong cultures that respect each other because they know who they are. A world that welcomes people through assimilation, not dissolution.

The second is a world of total dilution, where every culture melts into a tasteless mush with no memory and no roots. They sell it to you as diversity, but it's the opposite. Real diversity is different peoples remaining themselves. A world where everyone is the same, everywhere, isn't diverse. It's uniform. And a uniform world is the easiest one to control.

For a century, this system seemed unstoppable. It held the schools, the press, the culture, and the institutions.

It lacked one thing: someone powerful enough that he couldn't be bought, who decided to look and say what he saw.

Elon Musk did it, and I have high hopes that he'll be the one to finish this project off.

The lie had a century. The truth only needs a moment.

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

RFK Jr: "Vaccines have caused an EXPLOSION of allergies to PEANUTS, DAIRY, EGGS, MEAT & MANY MORE."

"How do you CAUSE a sudden lifelong debilitating allergy?"

"You inject the ALUMINUM adjuvant with PROTEIN."

The Aluminum adjuvant does not JUST give you allergies to the materials that are in that vaccine.

It will also give you an allergy to materials that are in the ambient environment at the time the vaccine was given.

For example, if you get that vaccine when there's a Timothy Weed outbreak, you can suddenly come down with a lifelong allergy to Timothy Weed.

Research shows that vaccinated children have 30X the rate of Allergic Rhinitis as kids who are unvaccinated.

And 36% Higher Rate Of Asthma Diagnosis In 2-5 year old children.

We created an entire generation of severe allergies by injecting vaccines.

Common Excipients Used With Aluminum In Vaccines:

1: Peanut--causes lifelong peanut allergy.

2: Egg Protein--responsible for egg & poultry allergies.

3: Gelatin--pork gelatin can be the cause of meat allergy.

4: Casein Dairy Protein--causes lifelong dairy intolerance.

5: Neomycin Antibiotic--causes antibiotic resistance & antibiotic allergies.

6: Yeast Protein--causes lifelong Brewer's Yeast & Baker's Yeast allergies.

7: PEG Polyethylene Glycol--causes a lifelong allergy to this polymer widely used in food, cosmetics & medications.

8: Beef growth medium/Fetal Bovine Serum-- can be a cause of Alpha Gal Syndrome.

Nobel Laureate Charles Richet demonstrated over a hundred years ago that injecting a protein into animals or humans causes immune system sensitization to that protein.

Subsequent exposure to the protein results in allergic reactions or anaphylaxis. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) confirmed that food proteins in vaccines cause food allergy, in its 2011 report.

And here's the kicker...

The same Big Pharma companies that created the allergy epidemic now make billions more, by selling allergy medications like...

Claritin, Allegra, Zyrtec, Xyzal

And these products cause depression which then make them more profit when antidepressant SSRIs are prescribed.

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

I don't understand how someone this low IQ has a job, let alone a job that gives her power over our lives.

[F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli @USAttyEssayli]

Hey Fraud King 👑

We’re not waiting for them to vote. You’re not allowed to have any noncitizens on your voter rolls. “Period. Full stop.”

It doesn’t matter if some haven’t voted in a prior election.

Stop playing games. Work with us to quickly verify the names we provided and prevent noncitizens from diluting the votes of American citizens.

If you’re so convinced we’re wrong, prove it. We can clear this up in days and give everyone confidence in the upcoming election.

What are you afraid of?

[A Midwestern Doctor @MidwesternDoc]

In 1979, a prime-time network news show aired a segment no network would dare air today.

46 million Americans had "obediently" taken the 1976 swine flu shot, and 4,000 were now suing. Then the CDC official tracking the shot's side effects admitted he'd warned his bosses about neurological disorders before the campaign began.

His bosses claimed he never told them. His answer: "That's nonsense."

This is what the news looked like before Pharma bought it. 🧵

[Chris Martz @ChrisMartzWX]

A quarter of a century ago, CNN said that 60% of the world’s coral reefs would be lost by 2030.

That prediction isn’t working out too well.

Stefan Rahmsdork is just fear mongering, as usual.