Jeanne Darque

La Vérité m’a libérée et je la servirai. Médecin des âmes, servante du Christ.

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

11 years ago, 21 Egyptian Copt Christians were beheaded by ISIS in Libya for refusing to convert to Islam.

Their last words were: “Jesus, I love you.”

Remember, no one marched for them.
No one protested for them!

[Julian Paul Assange @QJulianPaul]

Since the Roman Empire and even before, a hidden Luciferian cult has allegedly ruled from the shadows, committing horrific acts against children.

When the truth is finally exposed, the world will be shocked by what has been hidden.

No mercy for those who harm children.

[Bertrand SCHOLLER @55Bellechasse]

D’ici combien de temps Trump annoncera-t-il qu’il faut, de fait, reprendre le contrôle du Golfe ?

La question aurait paru absurde hier. Elle l’est beaucoup moins aujourd’hui.

Après le Venezuela, où les États-Unis ne se contentent plus de parler de démocratie mais organisent désormais ouvertement leur accès au pétrole, à l’or et aux minerais stratégiques, Trump dessine une doctrine beaucoup plus simple : ce qui est indispensable à la puissance américaine ne doit plus pouvoir échapper à l’Amérique.

Alors regardons le Golfe.

Pendant des décennies, l’Arabie saoudite, le Qatar et les Émirats furent des alliés magnifiques : ils achetaient américain, accueillaient les forces américaines, garantissaient une partie de l’architecture énergétique mondiale et demeuraient, malgré leurs immenses moyens financiers, à l’intérieur du système de sécurité conçu par Washington.

Mais que se passe-t-il lorsqu’ils veulent devenir réellement indépendants ?

Lorsqu’ils parlent à Pékin, Moscou et Téhéran ? Lorsqu’ils cherchent d’autres garanties militaires ? Lorsqu’ils considèrent que les guerres conduites par les États-Unis et Israël contre l’Iran mettent désormais directement leurs villes, leurs ports, leurs raffineries et leurs populations en danger ? Lorsqu’ils commencent à dire publiquement : l’Amérique ne suffit plus à assurer notre sécurité ?

L’allié devient alors encombrant.

Et voici peut-être le paradoxe extraordinaire de cette guerre : les monarchies du Golfe peuvent être les victimes collatérales de la confrontation américano-israélienne avec l’Iran tout en devenant, par ricochet, plus dépendantes encore de la puissance militaire américaine censée les protéger des conséquences de cette même confrontation.

Accident ?

Ou formidable mécanisme de vassalisation ?

Je ne prétends pas connaître la réponse. Mais la question mérite désormais d’être posée.

Car contrôler un pays au XXIe siècle ne signifie plus nécessairement planter son drapeau sur son palais. Il suffit parfois de contrôler son ciel, sa sécurité extérieure, ses armements, ses infrastructures stratégiques, ses débouchés énergétiques et finalement les limites de sa diplomatie.

Et Israël constitue évidemment l’autre variable de cette équation. Tant que Riyad, Doha ou Abou Dhabi accompagnent l’ordre régional souhaité par Washington et Jérusalem, leur puissance est utile. Mais s’ils devenaient les financiers, les médiateurs et les protecteurs d’un ordre arabe suffisamment autonome pour dire non à Israël comme aux États-Unis ?

Alors leur formidable richesse deviendrait paradoxalement leur faiblesse.

Le Venezuela possède le pétrole. Trump a décidé que l’Amérique devait en contrôler une partie déterminante.

Le Groenland possède sa position géographique et ses ressources. Trump explique depuis longtemps qu’il appartient aux intérêts stratégiques américains.

Le Canada possède territoire, énergie, minerais et accès à l’Arctique — et Trump continue même symboliquement de jouer avec l’idée de l’intégrer aux États-Unis.

Et le Golfe ?

Il possède pétrole, gaz, capitaux, ports, routes maritimes et une position absolument centrale entre l’Asie, l’Europe et l’Afrique.

Pourquoi serait-il le seul endroit du monde où cette nouvelle doctrine impériale américaine s’arrêterait poliment à la frontière ?

La question n’est donc peut-être pas : Trump envahira-t-il le Golfe ?

Elle est beaucoup plus subtile :

combien de souveraineté réelle Washington acceptera-t-il encore de laisser à ses alliés du Golfe lorsqu’ils commenceront à utiliser cette souveraineté contre les priorités américaines — ou israéliennes ?

[Grzegorz GPS Świderski @gps65]

The Second World Scam.

We are living in an inter-scam era, much like Europeans once lived through the interwar period between World War I and World War II. There is a historical joke hidden in that comparison. What we now call World War I was originally known simply as the Great War. Nobody needed to number it because nobody expected there to be another one. Only after the Second World War did the first become the First World War. I suspect global scams may eventually follow the same naming convention.

We have already lived through what might be called the Great World Scam. If another global operation built on fear, mass propaganda, emergency regulation, and enormous transfers of money appears, the first one may have to be renamed retrospectively as the First World Scam. The new one would then earn the obvious title: the Second World Scam.

The Great World Scam was built around a respiratory virus that was dangerous enough to frighten people but nowhere near dangerous enough to justify the scale of the response. With an estimated mortality rate often cited around 0.15%, it was exactly the kind of threat that could be magnified into something apocalyptic without actually destroying the societies being subjected to the panic. The basic formula was simple: take a real phenomenon, exaggerate its scale, dominate the information environment, and then sell extraordinary measures as the only responsible solution.

If that formula worked once, there is no reason to assume nobody will try it again. The next scam would probably follow the same basic pattern, but it is unlikely to rely on another medical emergency. Too many people have already learned how that particular game works. A genuine pandemic might not create enough fear to justify vast new systems of control, while a truly catastrophic pandemic would cause too much real damage. The ideal racket needs panic without excessive destruction.

That distinction matters because you cannot milk a dead cow. Mass death is bad for business. It is far more profitable to keep the population alive, working, consuming, paying taxes, obeying regulations, and periodically surrendering more money and freedom in response to each new emergency. Governments do not need dead subjects. They need productive ones.

This is also why traditional wars are becoming a relatively clumsy instrument. Wars destroy factories, infrastructure, housing, trade networks, customers, taxpayers, and entire markets. They may still make sense for backward states that rely on conquest, theft, territorial expansion, and brute military force, but sophisticated states have more efficient methods. Why destroy wealth when you can redistribute it? Why invade people when you can frighten them into compliance? Why seize their property by force when they can be persuaded to surrender it voluntarily?

A modern scam therefore works best when the real damage is small but the psychological impact is enormous. It should create fear without destroying the assets being exploited. The perfect crisis produces new regulations, new industries, new subsidies, new bureaucracies, and new markets while leaving the underlying economic machinery largely intact. Fear first, control second, profit third.

Climate change is an obvious candidate for such a mechanism, but it has one major weakness: it is too slow. The fear campaign has to be sustained for decades, the alleged catastrophe remains permanently somewhere in the future, and the political and propaganda effort must be maintained continuously. Climate politics works better as a permanent ideological framework for expanding regulation and state power than as a fast, concentrated global racket capable of producing huge profits within a year or two.

A true Second World Scam would need something faster, more dramatic, and more difficult for ordinary people to understand independently. It would need a subject that could generate fear, emergency legislation, enormous procurement programs, new security systems, and entire regulatory industries in a very short period of time.

My candidate is Artificial Intelligence.

AI has almost everything required for a perfect global panic. It is real, powerful, rapidly developing, difficult to understand, and almost impossible for ordinary people to verify directly. Most people have no practical way to distinguish between what AI can actually do, what experts merely speculate it might do, and what journalists or politicians claim it could do. That uncertainty creates an ideal environment for fear.

The mythology is already being built. We are constantly hearing about AI becoming conscious, escaping human control, manipulating people, replacing humanity, taking over critical infrastructure, or eventually destroying civilization. The cultural templates are already familiar: Skynet, The Matrix, rogue robots, autonomous weapons, machines that become smarter than their creators. None of this has to be completely invented. The most effective propaganda rarely creates reality from nothing; it takes something real and changes its perceived scale.

AI is particularly useful because it concerns information itself. One of the clearest lessons of the COVID era was that whoever controls the information environment can largely control the public interpretation of events. AI can already be used to moderate speech, rank information, filter content, detect supposedly dangerous material, analyze behavior, identify people, manipulate feeds, and automate surveillance. In countries like Poland, authorities still sometimes rely on older tools such as police, prosecutors, intelligence services, and direct legal pressure. AI offers something much more elegant: automated control over the entire information ecosystem.

The Second World Scam could therefore begin gradually. First would come years of warnings from scientists, CEOs, politicians, military officials, journalists, and former AI researchers claiming that the technology may become uncontrollable. Then we would see a series of high-profile incidents: perhaps a self-driving car allegedly makes a lethal decision, a chatbot is accused of blackmailing someone, an AI system leaks private recordings, a trading algorithm triggers a market crash, or an autonomous weapon attacks the wrong target. Some of these incidents might be real, some exaggerated, and some perhaps staged. From the point of view of the narrative, the distinction would matter very little.

The next phase would be a wave of dramatic resignations and warnings from insiders. AI researchers could leave major companies and announce that they can no longer guarantee the safety of the systems they helped create. Executives could warn that humanity has built something it may no longer be able to control. Politicians would demand emergency legislation, while journalists would discover a new existential threat that requires constant coverage.

Eventually there would need to be the big event: something dramatic enough to convince millions of people that AI had effectively broken loose. The internet might begin malfunctioning, social media platforms could go offline, banking systems might become unstable, mobile networks could fail, data centers could stop responding, and power grids could experience unexplained outages. For several hours or several days, it could appear that digital civilization itself was collapsing.

The crucial point would be uncertainty. Ordinary people would have no way to know whether the disruptions were caused by AI, a cyberattack, sabotage, software bugs, human error, or something else entirely. In such an environment, whoever controls the official narrative would have enormous power to define what had happened and what measures were supposedly necessary.

Traditional television and radio would suddenly become extremely important again because governments would need reliable channels through which to broadcast emergency instructions, official explanations, and new regulations. Experts would appear on television to explain why extraordinary measures were unavoidable, while the public would be told to remain calm and trust the authorities.

Then would come the solution: mandatory “anti-AI” security software, government-certified operating systems, digital identity systems, licensing of advanced computing hardware, restrictions on open-source AI, mandatory monitoring of networks, registration of powerful computers, logging of AI activity, remote shutdown capabilities, government-approved models, restrictions on encryption, hardware-level control mechanisms built into processors, tighter state supervision of data centers, and perhaps even direct government control over strategically important semiconductor production.

Every one of those measures would create a new market. There would be new software, new hardware, new compliance departments, new licenses, new consultants, new subsidies, new agencies, new contractors, new taxes, new surveillance systems, and new fortunes. Once people had been convinced that the alternative was a machine-driven apocalypse, there would be almost no limit to the amount of money that could be extracted in the name of safety.

That is what makes AI such an interesting candidate. A Second World Scam would not need to invent Artificial Intelligence because AI already exists. It would only need to invent, exaggerate, or strategically reinterpret the catastrophe associated with it. A technical risk could become an existential threat, an accident could become a global emergency, and a temporary emergency measure could become permanent infrastructure.

Perhaps, then, we really are living in an inter-scam era. The Great World Scam is behind us, while the next one has not yet arrived. If it does, the naming convention will be obvious. The old one becomes the First World Scam, and the new one becomes the Second World Scam.

World wars were numbered. Why not world scams?

[ThinkerView @Thinker_View]

"Aucune des deux entreprises n'agit de manière responsable. Elles foncent droit vers une superintelligence auto-améliorante et jouent à la roulette russe avec nos vies."

[Bertrand SCHOLLER @55Bellechasse]

La vérité continue d’être au cœur de mes recherches.

Mais j’ai parfois le sentiment qu’elle intéresse de moins en moins.

Non pas nécessairement parce que les hommes préfèrent le mensonge. Peut-être simplement parce qu’ils n’ont plus le temps de chercher, de vérifier, de douter, de revenir en arrière, de confronter deux versions.

Le flux a remplacé la réflexion.

Une information chasse l’autre. Une indignation efface la précédente. Un scandale enterre celui d’hier. Une guerre fait oublier l’autre.

Nous savons tout, presque instantanément, et nous ne comprenons peut-être plus grand-chose.

C’est cela qui m’inquiète le plus : le flux d’informations ne lave pas seulement les cerveaux. Il finit par laver les âmes.

Il efface la mémoire, émousse l’indignation, banalise l’inacceptable et nous habitue à passer à la suite.

Alors je continue à chercher la vérité.

Même lorsqu’elle dérange.
Même lorsqu’elle n’intéresse plus.

Parce que lorsque la vérité cesse d’intéresser un peuple, ce n’est pas seulement la vérité qui disparaît. C’est sa liberté de penser.

[Le COQ LIBRE @Lecoqlibre59]

Puisque Tiktok l'a supprimée sans honte en moins de 24h . C'est cadeau pour X

[𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝚘𝚗𝚎 ♱🇻🇦 @littleonefaith]

He tried to prove the accusations against the Catholic Church were true.

So he read the Bible.

He studied history.

He read the early Church Fathers.

And it completely backfired.

He came away with 10 reasons he could never be Protestant again.

Give him 23 minutes.

Watch this.

[Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆 @BPartisans]

Jared Kushner sur Israël :

Je pense que nous sommes d'accord avec les Israéliens sur l'objectif final pour Gaza.

Ils organisent simplement des élections étranges, et cela les rend un peu irrationnels à certains égards.

[Jeanne Darque @JeanneDarque79]

@leveilleur77 Scandaleux et pathétique à la fois: tellement peu de contenu qu’ils ne peuvent que singer ce qui en a.
On attend maintenant la singerie de la Shahadah: allez les frérots, montrez nous si la laïcité est vraiment la neutralité…

[Le Veilleur ♱🇻🇦 @leveilleur77]

« Je vous salue Marianne, pleine de force » : en détournant l’Ave Maria, la République révèle son versant antéchrist.

La laïcité prétend neutraliser le religieux, mais elle institue en réalité une AUTRE RELIGION LAÏQUE.

Jean-Louis Debré vous présente cette prière.

[Joseph Francis ♱ @VadeadIesum]

Exorcist Fr Dan Reehill on the new Minions & Monsters movie.

[Montjoie Saint Denis @SaintMontjoie]

« La vraie force de la France est dans les valeurs spirituelles. Tant que celles-ci se maintiendront (…), de toutes les crises, elle pourra sortir purifiée, rajeunie... » Pie XII

[Montjoie Saint Denis @SaintMontjoie]

Lire : les écoles catholiques n’ont pas leur place dans la république.
La chasse aux catholiques est ouverte depuis deux siècles. La truelle est grosse.

[Jeanne Darque @JeanneDarque79]

@bosversenecemre Isaura

[Bertrand SCHOLLER @55Bellechasse]

Ponce Pilate en uniforme ???
Finalement on comprend mieux comment le Christ à été assassiné ?

À Qusra, une ambulance tente d’aller secourir des malades en urgence.

Des colons la bloquent.

Et l’armée israélienne, au lieu de permettre aux secours de passer et de faire respecter la loi, arrête médecins, ambulanciers et militants pacifistes venus les accompagner.

Il faut comprendre ce que montrent de telles images.

L’armée ne semble même plus là pour faire respecter le droit israélien face aux colons.

Elle laisse les colons imposer leur propre loi — puis intervient contre ceux qui tentent d’en protéger les victimes.

Une sorte de Ponce Pilate en uniforme : on ne commet pas nécessairement soi-même l’acte, mais on laisse faire ceux qui le commettent, tout en neutralisant ceux qui pourraient l’empêcher.

Et ensuite, on s’en lave les mains.

Cela vous rappelle quelque chose ?

L’assassinat du Christ ne commence-t-il pas aussi par cette mécanique terrible : savoir, avoir le pouvoir d’empêcher, céder à ceux qui réclament l’injustice… puis prétendre que ses mains sont propres ?

[Jeanne Darque @JeanneDarque79]

@QuentinCad31672 @CGloiret75113 Tellement bien dit, bravo.

[Jeanne Darque @JeanneDarque79]

@RicardoMinute Merci pour ce beau message.
Je vous recommande la lecture de In Aeternum Sine Pacto de B Scholler: plus nous serons nombreux à refuser les compromis et à rester fidèles, plus nous pourrons changer le cours des choses.
Bon dimanche.

[Jeanne Darque @JeanneDarque79]

@SofySerene 😋😋😋 One of the finest délocalisé on earth!

[Jeanne Darque @JeanneDarque79]

@Nath29021 @VictorSinclair3 Et que l’autre suppôt qui se fait passer pour un archevêque catholique aura fait son coming out FM