@drterrysimpson you forgot ballot harvesting, which is the riskiest of all the policies. As a scientist, what are the probabilities that Spencer Pratt got zero out of 24,000 votes in a ballot drop within the other night?
@drterrysimpson who is "they." do they get to see the ballot and who the person who is voting for? if the scan doesn't match in "they's" opinion, the vote is set aside and then what? the voter has to cure it, assuming "they" notified them? what a joke. all could easily be solved in person.
@BSaarX the unions have bought every democrat in California. It is grotesque. the left always complains about billionaires, but the billionaires aren't as big a problem as the unions in Democrat states, where the unions are bankrupting every blue city in america.
@jmasonn@LVpolitic ballot harvesting is the lifeline of fraud. it is grossly susceptible to fraud, and the State shows zero willingness to protect the vote.
@BunchaSheeple@TomRafflesJr@AaronBlake seriously? do you think there are ramifications? hundreds of ballots get harvested at apartment complexes. do you think the "ballot police" could ever find out they were fraudulent?
@DarwinBondGraha yeah, because the Democrat supermajority and Democratic AG would likely expose the process? Ballot harvesting makes the rules very susceptible to fraud, especially since CA refuses to clean up their voting records.
@Elex_Michaelson how many ballots are rejected and cured? who determines if the ballot is rejected? does the person making the determination have the ability to see the choices of those ballots?
@DodgersAndrew do you think ballot harvesting is susceptible to fraud? and, do you think the state of CA (with a supermajority and control of the AG) has any desire to even search for fraud?
@BunchaSheeple@TomRafflesJr@AaronBlake are you this stupid? At my house, we receive 3-4 ballots a year for people that no longer or never lived here. we throw them away. what makes you think everyone does?