Jenkins

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@FranWalsh73 This is just another form of socialism. And now our tax rates will go up even more to pay for yet another forever welfare program that will probably cost 10x more because of fraud. So dumb.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@NiallHarbison Why not use a dog diaper for Birdie? Life changing for dog and owner.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@NiallHarbison Couldn’t you put Birdie in a dog diaper?

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@SecretaryTurner @HUDgov And that’s just in MN.
We shouldn’t even have a HUD. Or be funding childcare. Not in the constitution.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@OcrazioCornPop WTF @SenMullin and @SenJohnKennedy ??!!!

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@C_3C_3 And it was only $16B. A tiny fraction of what needs to be cut. Unbelievable.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@RandPaul @elonmusk And it was only $16B. Shocking.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@elonmusk https://t.co/ijgGz25JPQ

[Rothmus 🏴 @Rothmus]

🎯🎯

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@MAGAStormX https://t.co/ijgGz25JPQ

[Rothmus 🏴 @Rothmus]

🎯🎯

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@NiallHarbison He looks sad in a lot of these recent posts at his new home. I wish you could have kept him. He was the brightest light of pure happiness.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@HHS_Jim Why are we paying for ANY child care!???

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@ballsdeepindoge Going through the legs is part of their training to stay close to their handler. Thank you for rescuing this beautiful precious boy.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@mattvanswol Because they need 60 votes in the Senate or would need to nuke the filibuster. Eliminating the filibuster would be shortsighted.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@RetroAgent12 @mattvanswol It’s not just non-citizen. It’s dead people, people who’ve moved, dementia patients, etc. You can’t have mass mail-in ballots and no voter ID. Mail-in voting is banned in most of Europe.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@epaleezeldin But she still received $500M of it. What’s happening with that?

[Grok @grok]

Yes, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin terminated the $2B grant to Power Forward Communities (linked to Stacey Abrams) in March 2025, as part of a $27B GGRF repeal. Per EPA records, funds were frozen post-termination with no further disbursements, and are being returned to the Treasury. However, reports indicate up to $539M may have been awarded before the freeze. Ongoing investigations continue.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@LuAnne97307 @WallStreetMav @leemzeldin Half was reportedly dispersed:

[Grok @grok]

Yes, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin terminated the $2B grant to Power Forward Communities (linked to Stacey Abrams) in March 2025, as part of a $27B GGRF repeal. Per EPA records, funds were frozen post-termination with no further disbursements, and are being returned to the Treasury. However, reports indicate up to $539M may have been awarded before the freeze. Ongoing investigations continue.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@T_Q_Gardner @WallStreetMav @leemzeldin https://t.co/3ycRXndiKm

[Grok @grok]

Yes, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin terminated the $2B grant to Power Forward Communities (linked to Stacey Abrams) in March 2025, as part of a $27B GGRF repeal. Per EPA records, funds were frozen post-termination with no further disbursements, and are being returned to the Treasury. However, reports indicate up to $539M may have been awarded before the freeze. Ongoing investigations continue.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@Vote4JKendall @galaxyai__ @robbystarbuck Rent, healthcare, childcare, car payments, utilities, food

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@Bricktop_NAFO https://t.co/whnO4wo9pN

[Dylan Allman @dylanmallman]

This post is economic illiteracy on full display.

It confuses valuation with cash, wealth with money, and production with redistribution, which is the basic economic error behind almost every grievance like this.

Musk’s “money” exists as ownership stakes in capital goods that coordinate labor, technology, risk, and time across millions of voluntary exchanges.

You cannot “pay Social Security” with factories, code, satellites, or future expectations without liquidating them, collapsing the very structures that generate income and wages in the first place.

Even if you could vaporize that equity into spendable dollars, you would fund a fraction of an actuarially bankrupt program for a brief moment while destroying the productive engine that sustains it.

Wealth is created through entrepreneurial coordination under uncertainty, not hoarded as a static pile waiting to be reassigned. Social Security’s problem is not a shortage of billionaires to harvest but a political design that ignores time preference, demographics, and capital accumulation.

Calling this “taken” is a refusal to understand value creation, price signals, and economic calculation.

The claim sounds moral because it avoids thinking, and it persists because it treats prosperity as loot rather than as a fragile process that collapses the moment you start eating the machinery.

No one is poor because someone else is rich. That framing assumes a fixed pie that never grows, which is the opposite of how markets work. If Musk were actually sitting on a giant pile of idle cash, which he is not, that would signal enormous voluntary demand for what he produces and it would be deflationary.

Idle money lowers prices because it is not competing for resources. You cannot eat money or build with it. You can only exchange it, and exchange happens when value is offered and accepted.

The federal government spends in a single year an amount in the same range as the combined net worth of all US billionaires. Confiscate every dollar, pretend you could convert equity into cash without market collapse, and the state is funded for one year. Just one.

The next year there is nothing left to tax and far less productive capacity to draw from. This is why the state is the worst possible steward of capital. It faces no profit and loss discipline, operates on political incentives, rewards compliance over competence, spends other people’s money, and optimizes for short electoral horizons rather than long-term coordination.

People default to this zero-sum thinking because it feels intuitive and morally satisfying. It offers a villain, absolves personal responsibility, and replaces economic reasoning with resentment dressed up as justice.

It persists because it flatters the believer while demanding no understanding of how value is actually created. It is a huge problem and they should be rebuked accordingly.

[Jenkins @Jenkins83751007]

@Wisdom_HQ 34