@HilzFuld You say you want nuance, but your post has none. Shapiro didn’t apologize for being pro-Israel. He distanced himself from the statement that there would never be peace because Palestinians are “too battle-minded.” Can you only be pro-Israel if you think peace is impossible?
@CynthiaNixon Let’s be clear - Latimer was endorsed by the Democratic committees of Eastchester, Greenburgh, Harrison, Mount Vernon, Pelham Town, Rye City, Rye Town, Town of Mamaroneck, White Plains, and Yonkers. You do the math.
@briebriejoy Are the members of the Mount Vernon Democratic Committee—who unanimously endorsed Latimer—also “AIPAC-bought politicians”? https://t.co/fLWj4JJ9ur
@WestchesterFor2 @LatimerforNY If @JamaalBowmanNY has any ties to the District, why do 90% of his donations come from outside the district. Why are the local Democratic Committees endorsing Latimer?
Jamaal Bowman’s big problem? It’s not AIPAC. The movement politician faces a challenger with deep local ties in addition to the pro-Israel group’s millions. My analysis: https://t.co/Q4sJ3IEYyX via @politico
@PramilaJayapal @JamaalBowmanNY Do the “right-wing donors” control the Eastchester, Greenburgh, Harrison, Mount Vernon, Pelham, Rye, Mamaroneck, White Plains, and Yonkers Dem Committees, all of which endorsed George Latimer? Bowman simply doesn’t represent his constituents, which is why he’s going to lose.
@AOC People need to understand how abnormal it’s to have an incumbent so out of touch with his constituents. It’s why Bowman didn’t get endorsed by many local Dem committees including Eastchester, Greenburgh, Harrison, Mount Vernon, Pelham, Rye, Mamaroneck, White Plains, and Yonkers.
@ninaturner @JamaalBowmanNY What about the Dem Committees of Eastchester, Greenburgh, Harrison, Mount Vernon, Pelham, Rye, Scarsdale, Mamaroneck, White Plains, and Yonkers, all of which endorsed Latimer? Or should it be decided by Bowman’s donors, 90% of whom don’t live in the District?
@JRGartner@BarakRavid Isn’t the better interpretation that the release of all hostages is unconditional, as it explicitly says, and the ceasefire—which does not contain any similar unconditional language—is part of the overall resolution, i.e. conditional on the release of all hostages?
@JonahDispatch It’s amazing how much of the conservative cable chatter just yada yadas over everything other than the leak. I get saying leaks are bad. But the utter silence on the actual standard for overturning precedent that has previously been reaffirmed is fascinating and telling.
You can believe the leak was bad, but it is absolutely not the story tonight. The reason it’s all the right wants to talk about is because they don’t want to suffer the consequences of taking away rights from millions.