Presenting “Yikes! The Bluebook’s Generative AI Rule is Flawed" by Professor Jessica R. Gunder of the University of Idaho College of Law. Read more here: https://t.co/PPWXjU45Vh
(3) Rule 18.3’s incompatibility with how generative AI technology is used; and (4) how the requirements imposed by Rule 18.3 violate attorney-client confidentiality requirements and work product protections.
Comments & suggestions highly welcome.
I just submitted my latest: Yikes! The Bluebook’s Generative AI Rule is Flawed on @scholasticaLR. It is available on SSRN here:
https://t.co/bvg7KQeoAy
This book review considers the Bluebook’s new generative AI rule, concluding that the Bluebook’s requirements are inappropriate. It focuses upon: (1) errors within Rule 18.3 itself, (2) the unreasonable burden Rule 18.3 imposes;
Go into administrative law they said. The doctrine is sleepy they said. You won’t have to spend every summer updating all your course materials they said.
My article contends that R11 is not well-suited for sanctioning the negligent use of AI, however, it cautions against using standing orders to regulate litigant use of this technology.
Feedback is still welcome! https://t.co/SNPbq7jVYK
The Fifth Circuit decided this week not to adopt a specific rule governing the use of generative AI: https://t.co/1PzhmeyzjU -- a decision that aligns with my forthcoming @StanfordTechLR article.
Constitutional Case Assignment is out @NCLRev! It addresses current judge-shopping & case assignment controversies thru the lens of delegated procedural power. Congress has delegated some authority to SCOTUS & in turn FRCP 83 passed it on to lower cts. https://t.co/KmACKdsxph
@KatAMacfarlane Thanks, Kat! I feel fortunate to have had an excellent research assistant for this project (many jurisdictions changed their rollout plans repeatedly, and they weren't always particularly good at updating their materials!).
@ClareTyler20 Thanks! The draft is on SSRN - https://t.co/wmJfDJ9pKs. I don't see the final version on Tulane's site yet, but expect it will be available here soon: https://t.co/AvrlUMlh5g
Wonderful to see, "Why Can't I Have a Robot Lawyer? Limits on the Right to Appear Pro Se," in print! Thanks to the @TulaneLawReview students for their work on this project!
"Rule 11 Is No Match for Generative AI" - my article examining how Rule 11 is poorly situated to address the negligent use of generative AI - is forthcoming in the @StanfordTechLR. Comments and feedback are welcome!
https://t.co/SNPbq7jVYK
We are accepting applications for a faculty member who will serve as Associate Director of Academic Success and also teach in our wonderful legal writing program: https://t.co/REmmmzGFzd If you have any questions, please let me know as I’m chairing this search.
@brianlfrye Thanks! And agreed - if courts do impose a rule regarding AI, it should not require disclosure, but should only to inform litigants of risk and R11 obligations.
Alright! If any law reviews are looking for one last article, I just submitted my latest: Rule 11 Is No Match for Generative AI. It is available on SSRN here:
https://t.co/SNPbq7jo9c