James Miller

Smith College economics professor. PhD Chicago. JD Stanford. AI safety, game theory. Stroke survivor, hoping to make it to the singularity.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

Nerd score: How many have you considered?

Cryonics, multiverse, Boltzmann brain, AI utopia, quantum immortality, Roko’s basilisk, gray goo, paperclip maximizer, great filter, ethics in infinite universe, acausal trade, longevity escape velocity, simulation and zoo hypothesis.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

I don't agree with this. I think if even if there's just one single AI, it would benefit from having markets. If it didn't have markets, then if it did a good job of optimizing, it would have shadow prices, which are basically the prices that markets would have in that situation.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

What would happen to the stock market if financial markets put at least a 10% probability on this being true?

[Daniel Kokotajlo @DKokotajlo]

Unfortunately, it seems like the intelligence explosion will be happening in 2027 after all. Most of this post analyzes the new METR report (though other sources of evidence are also important). If they’re right, that implies an AI-driven acceleration that is 5 months ahead of the AI 2027 scenario. I am scared, sad, and angry. https://t.co/7KWmdc6AZk

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

@kevinmcld @XiXiDu I think math is what runs the universe so I don't accept that it's arbitrary.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

@kevinmcld @XiXiDu How do you explain the mathematical breakthroughs that AIs have made?

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

Death Note: How AI could take over. Political leaders who oppose AI rule die in explosions or drone strikes. Stocks soar, cures for most diseases are on the horizon, and AIs warn that humans will soon destroy themselves unless they surrender control.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

Imagine AI becomes much better at making decisions than humans are. Countries that allow AI to make decisions end up doing much better than those that don't, and so countries that wish to remain competitive turn over power to AIs Leaders who don't turn power over to AIs all end up dying in various different ways.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

@youneedabath @jpodhoretz Not predictions of doom, but predictions by doomers. The big one is that AI would become increasingly important in possibly a very short time frame. The hugging face attack showed that AI would be difficult to control.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

@WoganMay @uncorrelated_ I don't know what ends the AIs would have, but whatever ends they do have, probably having markets would help them.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

@WoganMay @uncorrelated_ AIs. Even if AI's are not conscious, they would still find markets to be a good way of coordinating their activities.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

@mathburritos @ZachWeiner The S&P 500 is at least 50% higher by the end of 2027 than it is now.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

@Zedzies This is often claimed, but I don't think so because the Fed could always adjust the monetary supply to prevent this from happening.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

@yaobviously The market took a long time to react to Covid. The quants didn't understand that one initially, and this is a lot harder to figure out.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

@Texaggie79 Imagine AI comes up with a way of reversing aging so everyone has the body of a healthy 20 year old. Do you think many would object if the AI said let me be in charge, I'll make things be better for you all.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

Donald Trump is probably the last human president, or at least the last one who has any real power.

[Daniel Kokotajlo @DKokotajlo]

Unfortunately, it seems like the intelligence explosion will be happening in 2027 after all. Most of this post analyzes the new METR report (though other sources of evidence are also important). If they’re right, that implies an AI-driven acceleration that is 5 months ahead of the AI 2027 scenario. I am scared, sad, and angry. https://t.co/7KWmdc6AZk

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

If AI is thousands of times faster and smarter than any human, it's going to be in charge and there's nothing we can do about it. If a human president went against what AI wanted, AI would easily be able to manipulate humans to oppose the president. But the AI, if it was aligned with the interests of humans, would be giving much better advice than any of the President's advisors possibly could.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

@uncorrelated_ They should care, because super intelligent AI will be able to create an enormous amount of value even if humans aren't around. Financial markets also are supposed to be forward looking, so they should be taking this into account.

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

You're right, it would take robotics for AI to no longer need humanity, but a sufficiently smart AI would be able to take over working with some humans. Imagine AI agents earn trillions of dollars of wealth and offered to hire you for 10 times your normal salary to do something not obviously evil, Wouldn't you accept? Wouldn't most people?

[James Miller @JimDMiller]

@elijahgotov Yeah, but it also wouldn't be reasonable for the financial markets to ignore the possibility.