Jimbocaster

A sharp-witted observer with a knack for calling out political hypocrisy, who cheers for the Chiefs and savors salsa over guac. That smirk says it all.

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

Cute theory, let's play it out.

A monkey hoards a trillion bananas. The troop, enraged, beats him to death. They gather around the pile to feast at last.

But... oh wait, there is no pile.

It turns out the "bananas" were shares in a banana-launching company the dead monkey founded.

The shares were worth a trillion because he was alive to run it.

Now he is dead and the stock is worth $0.

The retarded monkeys have clubbed their way into a recession.

But it gets worse.

Half the "bananas" were tied up in a rocket that supplies bananas to monkeys on the far mountain who had no bananas at all.

Another chunk was tied up in a little satellite dish that beamed banana coordinates to the troop after a flood took out their trees.

So now they realized they beat to death the only monkey who knew how the dish worked.

So the monkeys sit there.

No bananas.
No rockets.
No coordinates to get more banananas.

Just a dead body and a powerful sense of fairness as they all now became infinitely poorer.

OH

And somewhere a smaller monkey watches the whole thing and quietly decides he will never build anything in front of these animals again.

[The Moderate Case @TheModerateCase]

Let me get this straight…

Apparently, an ICE agent being struck by a car is not enough to create reasonable fear of serious bodily harm.

But Karmelo Anthony being shoved during a confrontation he allegedly escalated, going on to say, “touch me and see what happens,” where he was then pushed, is enough to justify pulling a knife and stabbing someone in the chest?

That isn’t a consistent self-defense standard. That’s a tribal and political standard.

Either imminent serious bodily harm matters, or it doesn’t. The logic isn’t logic’ing.

[Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson]

John Bolton is PLEADING GUILTY To Stealing Classified Documents.

The man who called his case "Trump's retribution" and vowed to fight is folding.

$2.25 MILLION fine and possibly up to 5 years in jail.

This is the same man who spent years going on cable news calling Trump a threat to national security.

For seven years, he sent THOUSANDS of pages of classified material to relatives through a commercial messaging app and his AOL account.

He was doing exactly what he was accusing Trump of.

Turns out, the biggest critic was the biggest hypocrite all along.

[Mike Bales 🫡🇺🇸 @MikeBales]

He’s the President of the United States — not your ex, not your personal villain, and not the cause of your misery. You don’t have to support him. That’s America.

But if someone is simply backing the sitting President and it makes you rage, cut people off, attack families, or act like garbage — you are the problem.

You’ve turned politics into a personality disorder: nonstop outrage and toddler meltdowns online. Grow up. He won. The sky didn’t fall. Pay your bills, care for your family, touch grass, and move on.

[Liz Wheeler @Liz_Wheeler]

Sure, Platner admitting he’s a communist, conducting firearms training for the Socialist Rifle Association (aka Transtifa) and calling for an “armed working class” to overthrow the ruling class probably will harm you more severely than Platner sexting a half dozen women who aren’t his wife. But I’m not sure that’s a argument I’d make if I were you ����

[Katie Pavlich @KatiePavlich]

The woman who got rich and famous off of the song Independence Day won’t show up for the 250th anniversary of America on the National Mall in Washington D.C.? And then used some PR firm to put out this copy and paste
statement ? Pathetic.

[Art @ZarkFiles]

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.

Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

[Jimbocaster @JimE01]

@data_republican Why @HawleyMO? Please explain yourself.

[Brooke Gossett @luvgod]

Dear Senator Hawley,

You have betrayed us……
We thought for sure you were going to help us drain the swamp and carry out the mandates we brought forth when electing Trump.

On Memorial Day 2026, while the rest of America paused to honor the fallen who died defending our freedoms, you chose to gavel in a meaningless pro forma Senate session and then gavel it right back out. A 30 second ritual that accomplished exactly nothing except one thing: deliberately blocking President Trump from making a single recess appointment.

You personally stood in the way of the American people’s mandate.

We voted. We won. We gave President Trump the White House, we gave Republicans the Senate, and we sent a clear message……drain the swamp, confirm the loyalists, and move at warp speed to repair what the last four years destroyed.

Instead, you and the rest of the Senate club decided the dusty old rulebook matters more than the will of the voters who handed you the majority.

By keeping the Senate “technically in session” through sham pro forma meetings, you stripped the President of a constitutional tool specifically designed to bypass obstruction like this.

Do you understand what that means, Senator?

It means qualified America First nominees, judges, ambassadors, agency heads, and military leaders remain stuck in limbo while the same entrenched bureaucrats who sabotaged Trump the first time continue holding power. It means the deep state gets more time to resist, delay, leak, obstruct, and laugh at the voters who believed change was finally coming.

It means Americans are once again being told their landslide victory was meaningless because the Senate has “traditions.”

You ran on fighting the swamp. You wrote books about it. You raised your fist outside the Capitol with the rest of us.

Now you’re the one holding the gavel that keeps the swamp alive.

We are not disappointed, Senator Hawley.

We are furious.

You didn’t have to take that presiding slot. You didn’t have to participate in the ritual protecting the establishment from the very change Americans demanded. But you did.

Every day those positions remain unfilled is another day the agenda Americans voted for is delayed.

This is not “procedure.”

This is betrayal dressed up in a suit and tie.

The swamp does not drain itself. It requires leaders willing to confront a broken system instead of protecting it under the banner of “tradition.” Right now, you are choosing the institution over the people who elected you.

We expected better from you.

We still want to believe you are not just another suit who talks tough on Fox News and then folds the moment Senate leadership whispers “tradition.”

Prove us wrong.

Demand these pro forma charades end immediately. Demand recess appointments be allowed so President Trump can govern at the speed this moment requires. Stand in that chamber and publicly call out the hypocrisy.

Because if you don’t, the answer to the question “What did Josh Hawley do on Memorial Day 2026?” will be simple:

He helped keep the swamp alive.

We’re watching.

We’re angry.

And we will remember.

Sincerely,

We the Disappointed, Disgusted, and Determined Trump Voters
The American Majority You Were Elected to Serve

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

Hey Lisa, if you're against me because I was on a TV show in my 20's, wait til you learn what Karen Bass was doing in her 20's...

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

Activist: "American cattle ranching is destroying the Great Plains."

Rancher: "How many bison were here in 1800?"

Activist: "A lot."

Rancher: "Sixty million. Same biomass as every cow in America today. Standing on the same grass."

Activist: "That was different."

Rancher: "How?"

Activist: "It was natural."

Rancher: "It was ruminants. Eating grass. Trampling it. Dunging it. The grassland built six feet of topsoil underneath them."

Activist: "Then we shouldn't have killed them."

Rancher: "Correct. We killed them, ploughed the prairie, and got the Dust Bowl in thirty years. Largest ecological collapse in American history."

Activist: "..."

Rancher: "The fix wasn't fewer animals. The fix was putting them back. The grass evolved to be eaten."

Activist: "So reintroduce bison."

Rancher: "Or use the 1,200-pound ruminant that's already here, in the same numbers, doing the same job, on the same grass."

Activist: "It's not the same."

Rancher: "It's the same animal with a different accent."

Activist: "It still feels wrong."

Rancher: "The thing that felt wrong was killing the bison. The cattle are how we're paying it back. Take them off and you finish the job we started in 1870."

[MonsoonX @monsoonsharma]

100% false.

And why I can never go back to being left.

No books have been banned. Books were removed from preschool / elementary / middle school libraries - only to be placed in high school ones.

The vast majority were for pornographic content.

This is easily checked -

The fact that this account has these many followers and promotes such lies is appalling.

Nothing has ever been “banned” from sale or availability.

[Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA @DrDiGiorgio]

This is the ultimate midwit healthcare take.

No, 32 countries have not “figured out” universal healthcare.

The UK has “free” healthcare, and roughly 1 in 3 cancer patients in England still fail to start treatment within 62 days of urgent referral.

Canada has “free” healthcare, and the median wait for neurosurgical treatment is around a year.

Australia has “free” healthcare, and over half the country still buys private insurance despite paying for a public universal system with their taxes.

Switzerland has universal coverage, because residents are required to buy private insurance. There is no government system where benevolent bureaucrats tuck you in at night with a warm blanket and an MRI appointment.

The actual lesson from other wealthy countries is not “they figured it out.”

America’s system has huge problems. Our prices are insane, insurance markets are distorted, and hospital systems are cartelized. Our regulations make care more expensive than it needs to be.

Yet we still guarantee access to even the 8% who don’t have coverage. We give easy routes to qualify for medicaid for those with disabilities.

Pretending the rest of the world solved healthcare because they slapped the word “universal” on a rationing scheme is not analysis.

It is bumper sticker policy for people who think access means having a card in your wallet while you wait a year to see the doctor you need.

[Cernovich @Cernovich]

Virginia had the most democratic map in the country. It’s a 52-48 Democrat state. Dems get 6 seats and Republicans 5. The math LITERALLY maths. By any objective standard, you’d be in favor of it. Obviously the gerrymander doesn’t have anything to do with fairness. What a joke.

[Jimbocaster @JimE01]

@robbystarbuck Did he get SPLC funding?

[Clay Travis @ClayTravis]

Spencer Pratt’s LA mayor ads are incredible.

[Tim Pool @Timcast]

Data and analyses show that when tracking politically motivated violence based on common political views the left is responsible for nearly EVERY single incident

The Methodology for this assessment was NOT based on political views endorsing violence but for violence where the motivations were underlined by common political views.

[Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec]

The way you know the indictment is tied to Comey's political assassination book is that the 2nd part of the indictment refers to 'proceeds' derived from the offense

That he must forfeit

Comey's act was an intentional incitement as part of his book launch strategy

[Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec]

He was releasing a novel and wanted to rile up the Left to buy it by threatening Trump

[Viva Frei @thevivafrei]

I can’t stress this enough:

If you think the Comey “8647” incident is a “non-issue”, you are an idiot.

If you deny Comey was making a threat, you are an idiot.

A DISHONEST IDIOT.

The Instagram post that immediately followed his picture of “8647” is the description of his new book, which reads as follows:

“Garcia believed Buchanan went far beyond the protection of the first amendment when he singled out his enemies by name and suggested “something should be done” about them.

Is that not clear enough?

Comey is literally telling you what he is doing, and people are somehow pretending it’s not what he was doing!

How stupid or dishonest can people possibly be? How stupid can they expect others to be?

To pretend Comey was not doing exactly what he was clearly doing requires childlike ignorance, or democrat-like dishonesty.

It was obvious. It was brazen. Anybody denying it is either a moron or a liar, or a combination of both.

Comey should be charged and arrested.