Cannabis use is increasing worldwide amid broad acceptance and legalization. The prevalence of traditional smoking is diminishing in favor of vaping dry flower. This is the first study to provide initial evidence that cannabis aerosol contains carcinogenic, teratogenic, and respiratory toxicants that induce transcriptional responses in epithelial cells analogous to those from cannabis smoke, suggesting potential adverse pulmonary effects.
https://t.co/2feGY1k59I
@therealtyler896@madras_bertha@LNseven5 Tyler, your graph for marijuana is only for teens. Check the usage for other age groups. Tell us if usage for people in their 20's is up or down.
@SenLummis@SenRonJohnson@SenatorLankford@FoxNews@CNN@PAGop@indgop@SenToddYoung@Senatorbanks@WisGOP Trumps Strategy: Promote another tobacco like health disaster by promoting smoking weed via unproven medical benefits and lobby money from the cannabis industry. The biggest drug health cause of death in the USA is tobacco by far. Tobacco deaths 480,000 vs 80,000 OD deaths in the USA. . Health harms of cannabis Trump does not want you to know about. "Evidence shows a clear association between cannabis use and psychosis, affective disorders, anxiety, sleep disorders, cognitive failures, respiratory adverse events, cancer, cardiovascular outcomes, and gastrointestinal disorders. Moreover, cannabis use is a risk factor for motor vehicle collision, suicidal behavior and partner and child violence. Cannabis use is a risk factor for several medical conditions and negative social consequences"
https://t.co/IkuDdWkkDH
@WowImJoe@drsanjaygupta Joe, your comment is what we expect the weed lovers. Your partner in pushing smoking weed is Big Tobacco. If you recall. they lied about the health hazards of their products for decades.
@wttw WTTW, some people are not as gullible as you hope they are. This sounds like a study backed by Big Tobacco saying their products did not cause cancer and heart disease.
@FrankLuntz Smoking weed is a lung cancer risk. Will the politicians and states who promoted recreational cannabis be held legally liable?$$ . "in a recent study by Keck Medicine led by Niels Kokot, MD, an otolaryngologist at the USC Caruso Department of Otolaryngology โ Head and Neck Surgery, data suggested that patients who heavily smoked marijuana may have an increased risk of both small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer"
https://t.co/GKxuY8uEfL
@journalsentinel This paper does not understand simple math. They ignore the costs. Wisconsin Tobacco tax revenue ( also a smoked substance) is 700 millon. The healthcare costs and lost productivity are 8 billion.
You could not dispute my previous corrections of your "fact-challenged" info. Now you decided to add another one. Nowhere did I say or infer Pubmed is used by the FDA for drug approval. This recent study may of interest to you.
"Smoking cannabis can do more than blur memories. It can reshape them"
A new Washington State University study found that people who consumed THC were more likely to recall words that were never presented and struggled with everyday tasks such as remembering to do something later https://t.co/5QWBCODYua
You say "PubMed is an NGO and is not and has never been an official FDA approved medical journal of science" 1) PubMed is not an NGO (Non-Governmental Organization). You are wrong. It is a free, government-run search engine developed and maintained by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) at the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). 2) The FDA does not have a list of officially named "approved" publishers. PubMed is not a "medial journal of science" it is a database that indexes, searches, and provides access to thousands of different scientific and medical journals, rather than publishing articles itself. You are wrong. 3) You said "PubMed is a private for-profit company. You were wrong. 4) You claim people think PubMed is a "Bible". You provide no evidence. That appears be a typical pro-cannabis embellishment.
You are wrong! You need to improve/update your reseach. PubMed is a free, NON-PROFIT resource developed and maintained by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov) National Institutes of Health (.gov) https://t.co/86tyQ9bjoX. As a government entity, it is not a commercial publisher, but rather a public service that provides free access to over 39 million biomedical citations, abstracts, and linked full-text articles {Link: National Institutes of Health (.gov) National Institutes of Health
You need to improve/update your "research". Epidiolex (a cannabinoid drug) is an FDA approved drug. In case you are unaware at least 40 other countries not subject to the USA scheduling system conduct cannabis research. You can find their documents in PUBMED. "Tammy Bladwin. Says as a Schedule 1 drug, marijuana carries a designation that means it "should not be researched" "One of the biggest misconceptions is that Schedule I status of a drug makes it impossible for research. This is simply not true," said Wade Sparks, a DEA spokesman. "Schedule I research is absolutely permitted with a proper registration."
There are currently 449 researchers registered with the DEA to study marijuana, and 249 registered for research of other Schedule 1 drugs, Sparks said. September 14, 2018 (8 years ago)
We gave Baldwin a Mostly False rating for another marijuana claim from that interview -- that medical providers with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs are "censored" from talking with veterans about marijuana"
https://t.co/QErTXsa764
@abc7newsbayarea@Freedom_NoDrugs Some of us have known this for years. The politicians ignored science based evidence. Ask your local pro-weed politician how much cannabis lobby money they received.