@407KingShotty This is more complicated because her plea is not guilty by reason of insanity. A far higher threshold and more complicated than just determining if she did it because it's already known she did.
@actlikeidgafbid@DRodbone America has a thing called a constitution. The constitution gives Americans rights. One of them is the freedom of speech and expression which includes art. This new AI generated thing temporarily falls under that until our Supreme Court decides what to do about it.
@ANappeunGijibae@DRodbone First, there's literally zero evidence of that first claim being true and nothing was legalized except AI imagery and it wasn't legalized just because. It was partially legalized (eventually it'll get to Supreme Court) because it goes against a previous decision. Do some research
@thatbixyuh@PopBase Isn't that already a given though? Like that's case with or without AI csam. If anything, there's bound to be those that are fine with the fantasy so that in turns save children from victimization, no?