@AppleHelix Patients and doctors often don't treat hypertension aggressively enough. So my interpretation of this article is that people need to act on the information more, not eschew the information.
@connebs@AaronBergman18 Extremely correct and the main point that needs to be understood in this discussion. It's a linguistic game. A "right" implies a non-consensual obligation on the other side of the equation... We have rather ugly words for this, like slavery, theft, and rape.
@FleetXAdmiral@jeremykauffman@wmz37 When you cut seed oils from your diet, what you’re really doing is cutting out processed foods, which are very calorie-dense, delicious, and easy to overeat.
@nkreu113r@RichardMCNgo@peterwildeford@brandonwilson I acknowledge your point, but that wasn't what Peter or Richard (or Patrick) were discussing. Maybe I'm pointing out the obvious, in which case, no worries.
(This is a very good forecaster.)
One of the nice things about the culture of bets/prediction markets/etc is that most claims about the world and future are very squishy.
@nkreu113r@RichardMCNgo@peterwildeford@brandonwilson Decouple more. Peter said, "I'm 50% sure we're going to all be unemployed". Richard responded to the claimed probability of the outcome. He didn't make a normative statement.