@TheSpursHarts@MUFCTYLER@magooglepop Fernandes is a good player yes absolutely, worth what you paid? No chance
Keep going on about picking a few wins up here and there but you’d trade places in a second and it’s hilarious
@TheSpursHarts@MUFCTYLER@magooglepop What battering are you talking about? 2 years ago in 2024 🤣
You can’t defend your teams logic because you know you overpaid, so you’re projecting
If united paid what you did, not many of us would be happy, we’ve traditionally overpaid and had issues because of it
Tinpot
Deluded
@utdsnook@UnitedUpdates You’re embarrassing, yeh there’s no midfielders left anywhere on the planet. £85m and £250k a week for Fernandes is a joke, glad we ain’t handing these contracts out again for fun. Fuck it off, and move on, if he valued his football he’d have come
He didn’t
He’ll regret it
Sir Keir Starmer has resigned as Prime Minister.
He has led the most authoritarian government in more than a generation, unleashing an unprecedented assault on free speech. Indeed, he seems determined to make social media censorship his legacy.
In the process, he has proved to be an effective recruiting sergeant for the Free Speech Union, with our membership growing from 14,000 at the time of the last General Election to more than 45,000 today.
But there is little reason to believe things will improve under his likely successor, Andy Burnham.
It is believed that the former MP for Makerfield and former head of Labour Together, Josh Simons, who resigned so Burnham could fight a by-election, is set for a plum job at the heart of Downing Street. The Free Speech Union recently exposed Labour’s ‘misinformation mafia’ that Simons led, targeting journalists and others that challenged Starmer’s technocratic managerialism. We anticipate an escalation in Labour’s efforts to suppress dissenting speech on social media in the forthcoming Representation of the People Bill, assuming Burnham doesn’t abandon the legislative programme outlined in the King’s Speech.
Burnham is also keen on bringing forward a ‘fully trans-inclusive’ ban on ‘conversion therapy’, which may mean criminalising parents who ‘misgender’ their confused adolescent children or who withhold consent from their children embarking on irreversible medical pathways.
No doubt there will be numerous other assaults on free speech which we’ll be keeping a close eye on.
The last sentence is the real meat and potatoes of this.
What's being promoted as a 'social media ban for children', is really an ID check for every adult.
@E_mungous@Ness0794@TheGriftReport So why does that make her stealing right? The higher ups can get fucked as well, but you won’t find me sitting here and agreeing with someone fiddling £78k out of public money. Wrong in either case.